scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Bath

EducationBath, Bath and North East Somerset, United Kingdom
About: University of Bath is a education organization based out in Bath, Bath and North East Somerset, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 15830 authors who have published 39608 publications receiving 1358769 citations. The organization is also known as: Bath University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
David Ford1
TL;DR: In this paper, a buyer-seller relationship is considered as a process through time, it is based on ideas from the IMP Project, and the process of establishment and development of relationship over time by considering stages in revolution.
Abstract: Notes buyer‐seller interdependence is crucial to industrial marketing — industrial firms establish buyer‐seller relationships of the close kind and long term. Examines buyer‐seller nature in industrial markets by considering development as a process through time, it is based on ideas from the IMP Project. Analyses the process of establishment and development of relationship over time by considering stages in revolution. Notes also that this process described herein does not argue the inevitability of relationship development. Discusses the pre‐relationship stage: the early stage; the development stage; the long‐term stage; and the final stage with points to debate. Describes how the development of buyer‐seller relationships can be seen as a process in terms of: the increasing experience of the two companies; reduction in their uncertainty and the distance between them; growth of both actual and perceived commitment; formal and informal adaptation to each other and the investments and savings involved. Fin...

1,416 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Overall there is an absence of evidence for behaviour therapy, except a small improvement in mood immediately following treatment when compared with an active control, and benefits of CBT emerged almost entirely from comparisons with treatment as usual/waiting list, not with active controls.
Abstract: Background Psychological treatments are designed to treat pain, distress and disability, and are in common practice. This review updates and extends the 2009 version of this systematic review. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of psychological therapies for chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults, compared with treatment as usual, waiting list control, or placebo control, for pain, disability, mood and catastrophic thinking. Search methods We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological therapy by searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Psychlit from the beginning of each abstracting service until September 2011. We identified additional studies from the reference lists of retrieved papers and from discussion with investigators. Selection criteria Full publications of RCTs of psychological treatments compared with an active treatment, waiting list or treatment as usual. We excluded studies if the pain was primarily headache, or was associated with a malignant disease. We also excluded studies if the number of patients in any treatment arm was less than 20. Data collection and analysis Forty-two studies met our criteria and 35 (4788 participants) provided data. Two authors rated all studies. We coded risk of bias as well as both the quality of the treatments and the methods using a scale designed for the purpose. We compared two main classes of treatment (cognitive behavioural therapy(CBT) and behaviour therapy) with two control conditions (treatment as usual; active control) at two assessment points (immediately following treatment and six months or more following treatment), giving eight comparisons. For each comparison, we assessed treatment effectiveness on four outcomes: pain, disability, mood and catastrophic thinking, giving a total of 32 possible analyses, of which there were data for 25. Main results Overall there is an absence of evidence for behaviour therapy, except a small improvement in mood immediately following treatment when compared with an active control. CBT has small positive effects on disability and catastrophising, but not on pain or mood, when compared with active controls. CBT has small to moderate effects on pain, disability, mood and catastrophising immediately post-treatment when compared with treatment as usual/waiting list, but all except a small effect on mood had disappeared at follow-up. At present there are insufficient data on the quality or content of treatment to investigate their influence on outcome. The quality of the trial design has improved over time but the quality of treatments has not. Authors' conclusions Benefits of CBT emerged almost entirely from comparisons with treatment as usual/waiting list, not with active controls. CBT but not behaviour therapy has weak effects in improving pain, but only immediately post-treatment and when compared with treatment as usual/waiting list. CBT but not behaviour therapy has small effects on disability associated with chronic pain, with some maintenance at six months. CBT is effective in altering mood and catastrophising outcomes, when compared with treatment as usual/waiting list, with some evidence that this is maintained at six months. Behaviour therapy has no effects on mood, but showed an effect on catastrophising immediately post-treatment. CBT is a useful approach to the management of chronic pain. There is no need for more general RCTs reporting group means: rather, different types of studies and analyses are needed to identify which components of CBT work for which type of patient on which outcome/s, and to try to understand why.

1,387 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Children and adolescents are probably more likely to experience high rates of depression and probably anxiety during and after enforced isolation ends, and this may increase as enforced isolation continues.
Abstract: Objective Disease containment of COVID-19 has necessitated widespread social isolation. We aimed to establish what is known about how loneliness and disease containment measures impact on the mental health in children and adolescents. Method For this rapid review, we searched MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Web of Science for articles published between January 1, 1946, and March 29, 2020. Of the articles, 20% were double screened using predefined criteria, and 20% of data was double extracted for quality assurance. Results A total of 83 articles (80 studies) met inclusion criteria. Of these, 63 studies reported on the impact of social isolation and loneliness on the mental health of previously healthy children and adolescents (n = 51,576; mean age 15.3 years). In all, 61 studies were observational, 18 were longitudinal, and 43 were cross-sectional studies assessing self-reported loneliness in healthy children and adolescents. One of these studies was a retrospective investigation after a pandemic. Two studies evaluated interventions. Studies had a high risk of bias, although longitudinal studies were of better methodological quality. Social isolation and loneliness increased the risk of depression, and possibly anxiety at the time at which loneliness was measured and between 0.25 and 9 years later. Duration of loneliness was more strongly correlated with mental health symptoms than intensity of loneliness. Conclusion Children and adolescents are probably more likely to experience high rates of depression and most likely anxiety during and after enforced isolation ends. This may increase as enforced isolation continues. Clinical services should offer preventive support and early intervention where possible and be prepared for an increase in mental health problems.

1,385 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A 12-item SOP scale, consistent with a multidimensional theoretical prescription, was developed and subsequently tested in the field with a sample of lakeshore property owners in northern Wisconsin (n=282) as mentioned in this paper.

1,351 citations

Book
08 Feb 2007
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the social psychology of brands and understand the meaning of brands in terms of emotion, emotion, and brand equity, as well as how to build brands through marketing communication.
Abstract: PART 1: THE SOCIO-CULTURAL MEANING OF BRANDS 1. Understanding the Social Psychology of Brands 2. Emotion and Brands 3. The Symbolic Meaning of Brands 4. Cultural Meaning Systems and Brands PART 2: BRAND EQUITY AND BRAND BUILDING 5. Brand Equity 6. Building Brands through Marketing Communication 7. Measuring Brand Performance and Equity PART 3: MANAGING BRANDS 8. Brand Strategies 1 - Symbolic brands 9. Brand Strategies 2 - Low-involvement brands 10. Brands, Innovation and High Technology 11. Brand Stretching and Retrenching 12. Managing Corporate Reputation

1,340 citations


Authors

Showing all 16056 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Michael Grätzel2481423303599
Brenda W.J.H. Penninx1701139119082
Amartya Sen149689141907
Gilbert Laporte12873062608
Andre K. Geim125445206833
Matthew Jones125116196909
Benoît Roux12049362215
Stephen Mann12066955008
Bruno S. Frey11990065368
Raymond A. Dwek11860352259
David Cutts11477864215
John Campbell107115056067
David Chandler10742452396
Peter H.R. Green10684360113
Huajian Gao10566746748
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Manchester
168K papers, 6.4M citations

96% related

University of Bristol
113.1K papers, 4.9M citations

94% related

National University of Singapore
165.4K papers, 5.4M citations

94% related

University of Oxford
258.1K papers, 12.9M citations

94% related

University of Cambridge
282.2K papers, 14.4M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202386
2022404
20212,475
20202,371
20192,144
20181,972