scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Bath

EducationBath, Bath and North East Somerset, United Kingdom
About: University of Bath is a education organization based out in Bath, Bath and North East Somerset, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 15830 authors who have published 39608 publications receiving 1358769 citations. The organization is also known as: Bath University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

255 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that if theoretically possible code structures are limited to reflect plausible biological constraints, and amino acid similarity is quantified using empirical data of substitution frequencies, the canonical code is at or very close to a global optimum for error minimization across plausible parameter space.
Abstract: The evolutionary forces that produced the canonical genetic code before the last universal ancestor remain obscure. One hypothesis is that the arrangement of amino acid/codon assignments results from selection to minimize the effects of errors (e.g., mistranslation and mutation) on resulting proteins. If amino acid similarity is measured as polarity, the canonical code does indeed outperform most theoretical alternatives. However, this finding does not hold for other amino acid properties, ignores plausible restrictions on possible code structure, and does not address the naturally occurring nonstandard genetic codes. Finally, other analyses have shown that significantly better code structures are possible. Here, we show that if theoretically possible code structures are limited to reflect plausible biological constraints, and amino acid similarity is quantified using empirical data of substitution frequencies, the canonical code is at or very close to a global optimum for error minimization across plausible parameter space. This result is robust to variation in the methods and assumptions of the analysis. Although significantly better codes do exist under some assumptions, they are extremely rare and thus consistent with reports of an adaptive code: previous analyses which suggest otherwise derive from a misleading metric. However, all extant, naturally occurring, secondarily derived, nonstandard genetic codes do appear less adaptive. The arrangement of amino acid assignments to the codons of the standard genetic code appears to be a direct product of natural selection for a system that minimizes the phenotypic impact of genetic error. Potential criticisms of previous analyses appear to be without substance. That known variants of the standard genetic code appear less adaptive suggests that different evolutionary factors predominated before and after fixation of the canonical code. While the evidence for an adaptive code is clear, the process by which the code achieved this optimization requires further attention.

255 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a broad-band study of GW170817 from radio to hard X-rays, including NuSTAR and Chandra observations up to 165 d after the merger, and a multimessenger analysis including LIGO constraints is presented, providing the first detailed comparison between non-trivial cocoon and jet models.
Abstract: We present our broad-band study of GW170817 from radio to hard X-rays, including NuSTAR and Chandra observations up to 165 d after the merger, and a multimessenger analysis including LIGO constraints. The data are compared with predictions from a wide range of models, providing the first detailed comparison between non-trivial cocoon and jet models. Homogeneous and power-law shaped jets, as well as simple cocoon models are ruled out by the data, while both a Gaussian shaped jet and a cocoon with energy injection can describe the current data set for a reasonable range of physical parameters, consistent with the typical values derived from short GRB afterglows. We propose that these models can be unambiguously discriminated by future observations measuring the post-peak behaviour, with F_ν ∝ t^(∼−1.0) for the cocoon and F_ν∝ t^(∼−2.5) for the jet model.

254 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Through a description of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life Assessment instruments and their development, the paper demonstrates how some of the earlier theoretical and methodological challenges have been addressed, together with a critique of its limitations.
Abstract: This paper is concerned with methods and theory recently used in cross-cultural research It begins by looking at why we need cross-cultural measures and why we need more of them A discussion of the translation styles, and the issues underpinning their design is central to this discussion Through a description of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life Assessment instruments and their development, the paper demonstrates how some of the earlier theoretical and methodological challenges have been addressed, together with a critique of its limitations

253 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article assesses the intestinal permeation enhancement action of over 250 PEs that have been tested in intestinal delivery models and places an emphasis on studies where PEs have been formulated with poorly permeable molecules in solid dosage forms and lipoidal dispersions.

253 citations


Authors

Showing all 16056 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Michael Grätzel2481423303599
Brenda W.J.H. Penninx1701139119082
Amartya Sen149689141907
Gilbert Laporte12873062608
Andre K. Geim125445206833
Matthew Jones125116196909
Benoît Roux12049362215
Stephen Mann12066955008
Bruno S. Frey11990065368
Raymond A. Dwek11860352259
David Cutts11477864215
John Campbell107115056067
David Chandler10742452396
Peter H.R. Green10684360113
Huajian Gao10566746748
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Manchester
168K papers, 6.4M citations

96% related

University of Bristol
113.1K papers, 4.9M citations

94% related

National University of Singapore
165.4K papers, 5.4M citations

94% related

University of Oxford
258.1K papers, 12.9M citations

94% related

University of Cambridge
282.2K papers, 14.4M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202386
2022404
20212,475
20202,371
20192,144
20181,972