scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

New results on $\nu_\mu \to \nu_\tau$ appearance with the OPERA experiment in the CNGS beam

N. Agafonova, +166 more
- 12 Aug 2013 - 
- Vol. 11, pp 014
TLDR
The OPERA neutrino experiment is designed to perform the first observation of neutrinos oscillations in direct appearance mode in the $\nu_\mu \to \nu_ \tau$ channel, via the detection of the leptons created in charged current interactions.
Abstract
The OPERA neutrino experiment is designed to perform the first observation of neutrino oscillations in direct appearance mode in the $\nu_\mu \to \nu_\tau$ channel, via the detection of the $\tau$-leptons created in charged current $\nu_\tau$ interactions. The detector, located in the underground Gran Sasso Laboratory, consists of an emulsion/lead target with an average mass of about 1.2 kt, complemented by electronic detectors. It is exposed to the CERN Neutrinos to Gran Sasso beam, with a baseline of 730 km and a mean energy of 17 GeV. The observation of the first $\nu_\tau$ candidate event and the analysis of the 2008-2009 neutrino sample have been reported in previous publications. This work describes substantial improvements in the analysis and in the evaluation of the detection efficiencies and backgrounds using new simulation tools. The analysis is extended to a sub-sample of 2010 and 2011 data, resulting from an electronic detector-based pre-selection, in which an additional $\nu_\tau$ candidate has been observed. The significance of the two events in terms of a $\nu_\mu \to \nu_\tau$ oscillation signal is of 2.40 $\sigma$.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

JHEP04(2014)014
Published for SISSA by Springer
Received: March 12, 2014
Accepted: March 12, 2014
Published: April 2, 2014
Erratum: new results on ν
µ
ν
τ
appearance with
the OPERA experiment in the CNGS beam
The OPERA collaboration
E-mail: andrea.longhin@lnf.infn.it, umut.kose@cern.ch
Erratum to: JHEP11(2013)036
ArXiv ePrint: 1308.2553
Section Introduction, first line: [1-3] becomes [1-4] with new reference:
Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa and S. Sakata, Remarks on the unified model of elementary
particles, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28 (1962) 870 [INSPIRE].
Table 4:
1.53 ± 0.16 becomes 1.53 ± 0.30
0.175 ± 0.024 becomes 0.175 ± 0.031
0.15 ± 0.02 becomes 0.15 ± 0.03
Conclusions: 1.53 ± 0.16 becomes 1.53 ± 0.30 and 0.18 ± 0.02 becomes 0.18 ± 0.03.
Section 3.6, page 14: D
T F D
=
L
R(p)
hρi
ρ
Eq. (4.1): n
0µ
(ν
CC
τ
) =
N(ν
CC
τ
)
N(ν
CC
µ
)
n
0µ
h
0µ
(ν
CC
τ
)i
h
0µ
(ν
CC
µ
)i+αh
0µ
(ν
NC
µ
)i
Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Open Access,
c
The Authors.
Article funded by SCOAP
3
.
doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2014)014

JHEP04(2014)014
The OPERA collaboration
N. Agafonova,
a
A. Aleksandrov,
b
A. Anokhina,
c
S. Aoki,
d
A. Ariga,
e
T. Ariga,
e
T. Asada,
x
D. Autiero,
f
A. Badertscher,
g
A. Ben Dhahbi,
e
D. Bender,
z
A. Bertolin,
h
C. Bozza,
i
R. Brugnera,
h,j
G. Brunetti,
e
B. B¨uttner,
k
S. Buontempo,
b
L. Chaussard,
f
M. Chernyavskiy,
l
V. Chiarella,
m
A. Chukanov,
n
L. Consiglio,
b
N. D’Ambrosio,
o
P. Del Amo Sanchez,
t
G. De
Lellis,
b,p
M. De Serio,
q
A. Di Crescenzo,
b,p
D. Di Ferdinando,
r
N. Di Marco,
o
S. Dmitrievski,
n
M. Dracos,
s
D. Duchesneau,
t
S. Dusini,
h
J. Ebert,
k
A. Ereditato,
e
J. Favier,
t
T. Ferber,
k,1
R. A. Fini,
q
T. Fukuda,
u
A. Garfagnini,
h,j
G. Giacomelli,
v ,r
C. Goellnitz,
k
J. Goldberg,
y
Y. Gornushkin,
n
G. Grella,
i
F. Grianti,
m,w
A. M Guler,
z
C. Gustavino,
aa
C. Hagner,
k
K. Hakamata,
x
T. Hara,
d
T. Hayakawa,
x
M. Hierholzer,
k,2
A. Hollnagel,
k
B. Hosseini,
b,p
H. Ishida,
u
K. Ishiguro,
x
M. Ishikawa,
x
K. Jakovcic,
aa
C. Jollet,
s
C. Kamiscioglu,
z,ak
M. Kamiscioglu,
z
T. Katsuragawa,
x
H. Kawahara,
x
J. Kawada,
e
J. H. Kim,
ab,ag
S. H. Kim,
ab,ag ,3
M. Kimura,
e
N. Kitagawa,
x
B. Klicek,
aa
K. Kodama,
ac
M. Komatsu,
x
U. Kose,
h
I. Kreslo,
e
A. Lauria,
b,p
J. Lenkeit,
k
A. Ljubicic,
aa
A. Longhin,
m
P. Loverre,
ad,aa
A. Malgin,
a
G. Mandrioli,
r
J. Marteau,
f
T. Matsuo,
u
V. Matveev,
a
N. Mauri,
v ,r
E. Medinaceli,
h,j
A. Meregaglia,
s
P. Migliozzi,
b
S. Mikado,
u
A. Minotti,
ad,4
M. Miyanishi,
x
E. Miyashita,
x
P. Monacelli,
ag
M. C. Montesi,
b,p
K. Morishima,
x
M. T. Muciaccia,
q ,ae
N. Naganawa,
x
T. Naka,
x
M. Nakamura,
x
T. Nakano,
x
Y. Nakatsuka,
x
K. Niwa,
x
S. Ogawa,
u
N. Okateva,
l
A. Olshevsky,
n
T. Omura,
x
K. Ozaki,
d
A. Paoloni,
m
B. D. Park,
ab,5
I. G. Park,
ab
A. Pastore,
q
L. Patrizii,
r
E. Pennacchio,
f
H. Pessard,
t
C. Pistillo,
e
D. Podgrudkov,
c
N. Polukhina,
l
M. Pozzato,
v ,r
K. Pretzl,
e
F. Pupilli,
o
R. Rescigno,
i
M. Roda,
h
T. Roganova,
c
H. Rokujo,
x
G. Rosa,
ad,aa
I. Rostovtseva,
aj
A. Rubbia,
g
A. Russo,
b
O. Ryazhskaya,
a
O. Sato,
x
Y. Sato,
ah
A. Schembri,
o
W. Schmidt-Parzefall,
k
I. Shakiryanova,
a
T. Schcedrina,
l,b
A. Sheshukov,
n
H. Shibuya,
u
T. Shiraishi,
x
G. Shoziyoev,
c
S. Simone,
q ,ae
M. Sioli,
v ,r
C. Sirignano,
h,j
G. Sirri,
r
M. Spinetti,
m
L. Stanco,
h
N. Starkov,
l
S.M. Stellacci,
i
M. Stipcevic,
aa
T. Strauss,
e
P. Strolin,
b,p
K. Suzuki,
x
S. Takahashi,
d
M. Tenti,
v ,r
F. Terranova,
m,af
V. Tioukov,
b
P. Tolun,
z,6
S. Tufanli,
e
P. Vilain,
ai
M. Vladimirov,
l
L. Votano,
m
J. L. Vuilleumier,
e
G. Wilquet,
ai
B. Wonsak,
k
C.S. Yoon,
ab
J. Yoshida,
x
M. Yoshimoto,
x
Y. Zaitsev,
aj
S. Zemskova,
n
A. Zghiche
t
a
INR Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Sciences RUS-117312, Moscow, Russia
b
INFN Sezione di Napoli, I-80125 Napoli, Italy
c
SINP MSU-Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University,
RUS-119992 Moscow, Russia
d
Kobe University, J-657-8501 Kobe, Japan
e
Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, Laboratory for High Energy Physics (LHEP),
University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
f
IPNL, Universit´e Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
g
ETH Zurich, Institute for Particle Physics, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
h
INFN Sezione di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy
i
Dip. di Fisica dell’Univ. di Salerno and “Gruppo Collegato” INFN, I-84084 Fisciano (SA) Italy
j
Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Universit`a di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy
k
Hamburg University, D-22761 Hamburg, Germany
l
LPI-Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
m
INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati dell’INFN, I-00044 Frascati (Roma), Italy
n
JINR-Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RUS-141980 Dubna, Russia
o
INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, I-67010 Assergi (L’Aquila), Italy
p
Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche dell’Universit`a Federico II di Napoli, I-80125 Napoli, Italy
q
INFN Sezione di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy
2

JHEP04(2014)014
r
INFN Sezione di Bologna, I-40127 Bologna, Italy
s
IPHC, Universit´e de Strasbourg, CNRS/IN2P3, F-67037 Strasbourg, France
t
LAPP, Universit´e de Savoie, CNRS IN2P3, F-74941 Annecy-le-Vieux, France
u
Toho University, J-274-8510 Funabashi, Japan
v
Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Universit`a di Bologna, I-40127 Bologna, Italy
w
Universit`a degli Studi di Urbino ‘Carlo Bo’, I-61029 Urbino, Italy
x
Nagoya University, J-464-8602 Nagoya, Japan
y
Department of Physics, Technion, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
z
METU Middle East Technical University, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey
aa
IRB-Rudjer Boskovic Institute, HR-10002 Zagreb, Croatia
ab
Gyeongsang National University, ROK-900 Gazwa-dong, Jinju 660-701, Korea
ac
Aichi University of Education, J-448-8542 Kariya (Aichi-Ken), Japan
ad
Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Universit`a di Roma ‘La Sapienza’ and INFN, I-00185 Roma, Italy
ae
Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Universit`a di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy
af
Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Universit`a di Milano-Bicocca, I-20126 Milano, Italy
ag
Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Universit`a dell’Aquila and INFN, I-67100 L’Aquila, Italy
ah
Utsunomiya University, J-321-8505 Tochigi-Ken, Utsunomiya, Japan
ai
IIHE, Universit´e Libre de Bruxelles, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
aj
ITEP-Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, RUS-317259 Moscow, Russia
ak
Ankara University, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
al
INFN Sezione di Roma, I-00185 Roma, Italy
1
Now at Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron (DESY), 22607 Hamburg, Germany
2
Now at LHEP, Univ. of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
3
Now at Kyungpook National Univ., 80 Daehakro, Bukgu, Daegu, Rep. of Korea
4
Now at IPHC, Universit´e de Strasbourg, CNRS/IN2P3, F-67037 Strasbourg, France
5
Now at Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan Univ., 158 Palyongro, MasanHoiwongu,
Changwon, Rep. of Korea
6
Deceased
3
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

N=2 dualities

TL;DR: In this article, the generalization of S-duality and Argyres-Seiberg duality for a large class of superconformal quiver gauge theories is studied.
Journal ArticleDOI

Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space

TL;DR: In this paper, a two-dimensional dilaton gravity system was studied and the symmetry breaking was studied in terms of a Schwarzian derivative effective action for a reparametrization.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Spectrum in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model

TL;DR: In this paper, the spectrum of two-particle states in the SYK model is computed and the four-point function is expressed as a sum over the spectrum, which is then evaluated.
Journal ArticleDOI

The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints

TL;DR: A review of the WIMP paradigm with focus on a few models which can be probed at best by these facilities, and Collider and Indirect Detection will not be neglected when they represent a complementary probe.
Journal ArticleDOI

Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation

TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that the discrepancy between the von Neumann entropy as calculated by Hawking and the requirements of unitarity is fixed by including new saddles in the gravitational path integral.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Review of Particle Physics

Claude Amsler, +176 more
- 01 Jul 1996 - 
TL;DR: This biennial Review summarizes much of particle physics, using data from previous editions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos

Y. Fukuda, +124 more
Abstract: We present an analysis of atmospheric neutrino data from a 33.0 kton yr (535-day) exposure of the Super-Kamiokande detector. The data exhibit a zenith angle dependent deficit of muon neutrinos which is inconsistent with expectations based on calculations of the atmospheric neutrino flux. Experimental biases and uncertainties in the prediction of neutrino fluxes and cross sections are unable to explain our observation. The data are consistent, however, with two-flavor ${\ensuremath{ u}}_{\ensuremath{\mu}}\ensuremath{\leftrightarrow}{\ensuremath{ u}}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}$ oscillations with ${sin}^{2}2\ensuremath{\theta}g0.82$ and $5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}l\ensuremath{\Delta}{m}^{2}l6\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1{0}^{\ensuremath{-}3}\mathrm{eV}{}^{2}$ at 90% confidence level.

Review of particle physics

TL;DR: Beringer et al. as mentioned in this paper presented a review of particle physics using data from previous editions, plus 2658 new measurements from 644 papers, and summarized searches for hypothetical particles such as Higgs bosons, heavy neutrinos, and supersymmetric particles.
Journal ArticleDOI

Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles

TL;DR: In this article, a particle mixture theory of neutrino is proposed assuming the existence of two kinds neutrinos, and a possible unified model of elementary particles is constructed by generalizing the Sakata-Nagoya model, which gives a natural explanation of smallness of leptonic decay rate of hyperons as well as subtle difference of G_ν's between µ-e and β-decay.

FLUKA: A multi-particle transport code (Program version 2005)

TL;DR: The 2005 version of the Fluka particle transport code is described in this article, where the basic notions, modular structure of the system, and an installation and beginner's guide are described.
Related Papers (5)