scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.

TLDR
Two data sources--self-reports and peer ratings--and two instruments--adjective factors and questionnaire scales--were used to assess the five-factor model of personality, showing substantial cross-observer agreement on all five adjective factors.
Abstract
Two data sources--self-reports and peer ratings--and two instruments--adjective factors and questionnaire scales--were used to assess the five-factor model of personality. As in a previous study of self-reports (McCrae & Costa, 1985b), adjective factors of neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness-antagonism, and conscientiousness-undirectedness were identified in an analysis of 738 peer ratings of 275 adult subjects. Intraclass correlations among raters, ranging from .30 to .65, and correlations between mean peer ratings and self-reports, from .25 to .62, showed substantial cross-observer agreement on all five adjective factors. Similar results were seen in analyses of scales from the NEO Personality Inventory. Items from the adjective factors were used as guides in a discussion of the nature of the five factors. These data reinforce recent appeals for the adoption of the five-factor model in personality research and assessment.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Interpersonal Problems and the Psychotherapy Context: The Construct Validity of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems

TL;DR: This paper investigated the construct validity of the Ihe Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP) in the context of psychodynamic psychotherapy and found that the IIP can be used to classify patients reporting interpersonal distress into one of four problem quadrants: Friendly Dominant, Hostile Dominant and Hostile Submissive.
Posted Content

When the Same Prime Leads to Different Effects

TL;DR: This paper showed that the same primed construct can have different effects on the subsequent choices of different groups of people, and that these differences in effects are attributable to the groups having different prime associations.
Journal ArticleDOI

`Nomothetic' and `Idiographic': Contrasting Windelband's Understanding with Contemporary Usage

TL;DR: This paper provided a more accurate historical perspective on the long-running nomothetic vs idiographic controversy, and provided a much needed critical perspective on certain knowledge claims currently issuing from some quarters of mainstream trait psychology.
Journal ArticleDOI

Work values and organizational citizenship behaviors: values that work for employees and organizations

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the question of why an employee engage in work that enhances organizational performance but is not necessarily recognized or rewarded by his or her employer, and suggest that this question can be answered in part by the degree to which an employee endorses the Protestant work ethic (PWE).
References
More filters
Book

Personality and Assessment

TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the acquired meaning of stimuli and on the situation as perceived, viewing the individual as a cognitive-affective being who construes, interprets, and transforms the stimulus in a dynamic reciprocal interaction with the social world.
Book

Review of personality and social psychology

TL;DR: Shaver and Shaver as mentioned in this paper proposed a model and some cross-cultural data to understand the determinants of emotion in a multicomponent process and the central role of emotion.
Related Papers (5)