scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Two data sources--self-reports and peer ratings--and two instruments--adjective factors and questionnaire scales--were used to assess the five-factor model of personality, showing substantial cross-observer agreement on all five adjective factors.
Abstract
Two data sources--self-reports and peer ratings--and two instruments--adjective factors and questionnaire scales--were used to assess the five-factor model of personality. As in a previous study of self-reports (McCrae & Costa, 1985b), adjective factors of neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness-antagonism, and conscientiousness-undirectedness were identified in an analysis of 738 peer ratings of 275 adult subjects. Intraclass correlations among raters, ranging from .30 to .65, and correlations between mean peer ratings and self-reports, from .25 to .62, showed substantial cross-observer agreement on all five adjective factors. Similar results were seen in analyses of scales from the NEO Personality Inventory. Items from the adjective factors were used as guides in a discussion of the nature of the five factors. These data reinforce recent appeals for the adoption of the five-factor model in personality research and assessment.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Cattell, Comrey, and Eysenck personality factors compared: More evidence for the five robust factors?

TL;DR: The Cattell 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16 PF), the Comrey Personality Scales (CPS), and the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI) were administered to a sample of 669 Australians that was controlled in composition for age, sex, and social class as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

What does your selfie say about you

TL;DR: This study is the first to reveal personality-related cues in selfies and provide a picture-coding scheme that can be used to analyze selfies and found specific cues related to agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism and openness.
Journal ArticleDOI

Different forces, same consequence: conscientiousness and competence beliefs are independent predictors of academic effort and achievement.

TL;DR: Both conscientiousness and competence beliefs meaningfully predicted academic effort, irrespective of how academic effort was measured (single-measurement questionnaire or diary data).
Posted Content

Increased Accuracy for Range Restriction Corrections: Implications for the Role of Personality and General Mental Ability in Job and Training Performance

TL;DR: The authors applied this procedure to meta-analytic validities of two personality measures (Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability) and general cognitive ability measures and found that the increases in validity estimates are greater for cognitive ability than for personality, reducing the relative validity of personality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessment of leader problem-solving capabilities.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe the development and initial psychometric evidence for a set of five constructed response measures designed to assess complex problem-solving skills and knowledge expected to influence leadership.
References
More filters
Book

Personality and Assessment

TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the acquired meaning of stimuli and on the situation as perceived, viewing the individual as a cognitive-affective being who construes, interprets, and transforms the stimulus in a dynamic reciprocal interaction with the social world.
Book

Review of personality and social psychology

TL;DR: Shaver and Shaver as mentioned in this paper proposed a model and some cross-cultural data to understand the determinants of emotion in a multicomponent process and the central role of emotion.
Related Papers (5)