scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Two data sources--self-reports and peer ratings--and two instruments--adjective factors and questionnaire scales--were used to assess the five-factor model of personality, showing substantial cross-observer agreement on all five adjective factors.
Abstract
Two data sources--self-reports and peer ratings--and two instruments--adjective factors and questionnaire scales--were used to assess the five-factor model of personality. As in a previous study of self-reports (McCrae & Costa, 1985b), adjective factors of neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness-antagonism, and conscientiousness-undirectedness were identified in an analysis of 738 peer ratings of 275 adult subjects. Intraclass correlations among raters, ranging from .30 to .65, and correlations between mean peer ratings and self-reports, from .25 to .62, showed substantial cross-observer agreement on all five adjective factors. Similar results were seen in analyses of scales from the NEO Personality Inventory. Items from the adjective factors were used as guides in a discussion of the nature of the five factors. These data reinforce recent appeals for the adoption of the five-factor model in personality research and assessment.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Deep Brain Stimulation and the Search for Identity

TL;DR: This paper elucidates what is meant by “becoming another person” from a conceptual point of view and comments on the possibility to empirically measure changes in individual identity and argues that many of the instruments now commonly used in selecting and monitoring DBS-patients are inappropriate for this purpose.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adolescent personality factors in self-ratings and peer nominations and their prediction of peer acceptance and peer rejection

TL;DR: The robustness of the Big Five personality factors in adolescents' self-ratings and peer nominations was investigated and it was suggested that peers evaluate group members not in terms of their personality but in termsof their group reputation.
ReportDOI

Measuring self-control

TL;DR: A survey-based measure of self-control provides insights into all three questions: 1. How significant are individual differences in selfcontrol? Do these differences impact wealth accumulation? From where do they derive? as discussed by the authors.
Book

Principles of Automated Negotiation

TL;DR: This state-of-the-art treatment of the subject explores key issues involved in the design of negotiating agents, covering strategic, heuristic, and axiomatic approaches.
References
More filters
Book

Personality and Assessment

TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the acquired meaning of stimuli and on the situation as perceived, viewing the individual as a cognitive-affective being who construes, interprets, and transforms the stimulus in a dynamic reciprocal interaction with the social world.
Book

Review of personality and social psychology

TL;DR: Shaver and Shaver as mentioned in this paper proposed a model and some cross-cultural data to understand the determinants of emotion in a multicomponent process and the central role of emotion.
Related Papers (5)