scispace - formally typeset
D

Douglas B. Kell

Researcher at University of Liverpool

Publications -  657
Citations -  55792

Douglas B. Kell is an academic researcher from University of Liverpool. The author has contributed to research in topics: Systems biology & Dielectric. The author has an hindex of 111, co-authored 634 publications receiving 50335 citations. Previous affiliations of Douglas B. Kell include Max Planck Society & University of Wales.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Non-linear optimization of biochemical pathways: applications to metabolic engineering and parameter estimation.

TL;DR: A generic approach to combine numerical optimization methods with biochemical kinetic simulations is described, suitable for use in the rational design of improved metabolic pathways with industrial significance and for solving the inverse problem of metabolic pathways.
Journal ArticleDOI

The passive electrical properties of biological systems: their significance in physiology, biophysics and biotechnology

TL;DR: The following topics are discussed: a summary of dielectric theory; amino acids, peptides, proteins and DNA; bound water in biological systems; biological electrolytes; membranes and cells; tissues.
Journal ArticleDOI

Viability and activity in readily culturable bacteria: a review and discussion of the practical issues

TL;DR: It is argued that failure to differentiate clearly between use of the terms ‘viability’ and ‘culturability” in an operational versus a conceptual sense is fuelling the current debate, and an alternative operational terminology is suggested that replaces ‘VBNC’ with expressions that are internally consistent.
Journal ArticleDOI

Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist

TL;DR: A physically implemented robotic system that applies techniques from artificial intelligence to carry out cycles of scientific experimentation and shows that an intelligent experiment selection strategy is competitive with human performance and significantly outperforms, with a cost decrease of 3-fold and 100-fold, both cheapest and random-experiment selection.