Institution
Cornell University
Education•Ithaca, New York, United States•
About: Cornell University is a education organization based out in Ithaca, New York, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Gene. The organization has 102246 authors who have published 235546 publications receiving 12283673 citations. The organization is also known as: Cornell & CUI.
Topics: Population, Gene, Cancer, Context (language use), Medicine
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
1,128 citations
••
French Institute of Health and Medical Research1, Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University2, Paris Descartes University3, University of Bern4, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg5, Providence Portland Medical Center6, Radboud University Nijmegen7, Umeå University8, Karolinska Institutet9, Humanitas University10, Medical University of Graz11, Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust12, Charles University in Prague13, Cornell University14, University Health Network15, University of Toronto16, Keio University17, Yamaguchi University18, Kindai University19, Harvard University20, Royal Melbourne Hospital21, University of Melbourne22, Sapporo Medical University23, Kurume University24, Xi'an Jiaotong University25, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center26, Mayo Clinic27, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy28, Oregon Health & Science University29
TL;DR: In colorectal cancer, the Immunoscore may add to the significance of the current AJCC/UICC TNM classification, since it has been demonstrated to be a prognostic factor superior to the AJCC or UICCTNM classification.
Abstract: The American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (AJCC/UICC) TNM staging system provides the most reliable guidelines for the routine prognostication and treatment of colorectal carcinoma. This traditional tumour staging summarizes data on tumour burden (T), the presence of cancer cells in draining and regional lymph nodes (N) and evidence for distant metastases (M). However, it is now recognized that the clinical outcome can vary significantly among patients within the same stage. The current classification provides limited prognostic information and does not predict response to therapy. Multiple ways to classify cancer and to distinguish different subtypes of colorectal cancer have been proposed, including morphology, cell origin, molecular pathways, mutation status and gene expression-based stratification. These parameters rely on tumour-cell characteristics. Extensive literature has investigated the host immune response against cancer and demonstrated the prognostic impact of the in situ immune cell infiltrate in tumours. A methodology named 'Immunoscore' has been defined to quantify the in situ immune infiltrate. In colorectal cancer, the Immunoscore may add to the significance of the current AJCC/UICC TNM classification, since it has been demonstrated to be a prognostic factor superior to the AJCC/UICC TNM classification. An international consortium has been initiated to validate and promote the Immunoscore in routine clinical settings. The results of this international consortium may result in the implementation of the Immunoscore as a new component for the classification of cancer, designated TNM-I (TNM-Immune).
1,128 citations
••
Medical University of Vienna1, Leiden University Medical Center2, Humboldt State University3, Cornell University4, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust5, Keio University6, Dresden University of Technology7, Drexel University8, VU University Medical Center9, Goethe University Frankfurt10, University of Montpellier11, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc12, University of Lisbon13, Hospital for Special Surgery14, University of Santiago, Chile15, Medical University of Graz16, University of Amsterdam17, University of Queensland18, University of Copenhagen19, University of Cambridge20, Southlake Regional Health Center21, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens22, Karolinska University Hospital23
TL;DR: The 4 overarching principles and 10 recommendations are based on stronger evidence than before and are supposed to inform patients, rheumatologists and other stakeholders about strategies to reach optimal outcomes of RA.
Abstract: Background Reaching the therapeutic target of remission or low-disease activity has improved outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) significantly. The treat-to-target recommendations, formulated in 2010, have provided a basis for implementation of a strategic approach towards this therapeutic goal in routine clinical practice, but these recommendations need to be re-evaluated for appropriateness and practicability in the light of new insights. Objective To update the 2010 treat-to-target recommendations based on systematic literature reviews (SLR) and expert opinion. Methods A task force of rheumatologists, patients and a nurse specialist assessed the SLR results and evaluated the individual items of the 2010 recommendations accordingly, reformulating many of the items. These were subsequently discussed, amended and voted upon by >40 experts, including 5 patients, from various regions of the world. Levels of evidence, strengths of recommendations and levels of agreement were derived. Results The update resulted in 4 overarching principles and 10 recommendations. The previous recommendations were partly adapted and their order changed as deemed appropriate in terms of importance in the view of the experts. The SLR had now provided also data for the effectiveness of targeting low-disease activity or remission in established rather than only early disease. The role of comorbidities, including their potential to preclude treatment intensification, was highlighted more strongly than before. The treatment aim was again defined as remission with low-disease activity being an alternative goal especially in patients with long-standing disease. Regular follow-up (every 1-3 months during active disease) with according therapeutic adaptations to reach the desired state was recommended. Follow-up examinations ought to employ composite measures of disease activity that include joint counts. Additional items provide further details for particular aspects of the disease, especially comorbidity and shared decision-making with the patient. Levels of evidence had increased for many items compared with the 2010 recommendations, and levels of agreement were very high for most of the individual recommendations (=9/10). Conclusions The 4 overarching principles and 10 recommendations are based on stronger evidence than before and are supposed to inform patients, rheumatologists and other stakeholders about strategies to reach optimal outcomes of RA.
1,128 citations
••
University of Sydney1, University of Western Australia2, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation3, James Cook University4, Rothamsted Research5, Argonne National Laboratory6, Ohio State University7, Cornell University8, Colorado State University9, Landcare Research10, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna11
TL;DR: In this article, a review highlights knowledge of the amount of carbon stored in soils globally, and the potential for carbon sequestration in soil, and discusses successful methods and models used to determine and estimate carbon pools and fluxes.
1,128 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate the informational role of transactions volume in options markets and show that negative and positive option volumes contain information about future stock prices, and that transactions in derivative markets may be an important predictor of future security price movements.
Abstract: This paper investigates the informational role of transactions volume in options markets. We develop an asymmetric information model in which informed traders may trade in option or equity markets. We show conditions under which informed traders trade options, and we investigate the implications of this for the linkage between markets. Our model predicts an important informational role for the volume of particular types of option trades. We empirically test our model's hypotheses with intraday option data. Our main empirical result is that negative and positive option volumes contain information about future stock prices. THE INFORMATION CONTENT of trading activity is a subject of widespread interest. If trades are correlated with private information, then the outcome of the transaction process may portend future movements in price. The extension of trading to different venues or to derivative instruments, however, means that this link between transactions and information need not be easily discernible. If there are alternative markets in which informed traders can profit from their information, then where informed traders choose to trade may have important implications not only for security p:rice movements, but for the behavior of related prices as well. This suggests that transactions in derivative markets may be an important predictor of future security price movements. In this paper we investigate the informational role of transactions volume in options markets. For some readers, this focus may seem puzzling; an option is a derivative security so its price should be dictated unilaterally by the behavior of the stock price. This unidirectional linkage is only true, however, in complete markets; if information is impounded into prices by trading, then the ability of informed traders to transact in options markets mearns
1,127 citations
Authors
Showing all 103081 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Eric S. Lander | 301 | 826 | 525976 |
David Miller | 203 | 2573 | 204840 |
Lewis C. Cantley | 196 | 748 | 169037 |
Charles A. Dinarello | 190 | 1058 | 139668 |
Scott M. Grundy | 187 | 841 | 231821 |
Paul G. Richardson | 183 | 1533 | 155912 |
Chris Sander | 178 | 713 | 233287 |
David R. Williams | 178 | 2034 | 138789 |
David L. Kaplan | 177 | 1944 | 146082 |
Kari Alitalo | 174 | 817 | 114231 |
Richard K. Wilson | 173 | 463 | 260000 |
George F. Koob | 171 | 935 | 112521 |
Avshalom Caspi | 170 | 524 | 113583 |
Derek R. Lovley | 168 | 582 | 95315 |
Stephen B. Baylin | 168 | 548 | 188934 |