Institution
University of Windsor
Education•Windsor, Ontario, Canada•
About: University of Windsor is a education organization based out in Windsor, Ontario, Canada. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Argumentation theory. The organization has 10654 authors who have published 22307 publications receiving 435906 citations. The organization is also known as: UWindsor & Assumption University of Windsor.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: This research demonstrates a useful procedure for systematically combining data that are not amenable to meta-analysis, and provides the most valid estimate of false memory formation and associated moderating factors within the implantation literature to date.
Abstract: Understanding that suggestive practices can promote false beliefs and false memories for childhood events is important in many settings (e.g., psychotherapeutic, medical, and legal). The generalisability of findings from memory implantation studies has been questioned due to variability in estimates across studies. Such variability is partly due to false memories having been operationalised differently across studies and to differences in memory induction techniques. We explored ways of defining false memory based on memory science and developed a reliable coding system that we applied to reports from eight published implantation studies (N = 423). Independent raters coded transcripts using seven criteria: accepting the suggestion, elaboration beyond the suggestion, imagery, coherence, emotion, memory statements, and not rejecting the suggestion. Using this scheme, 30.4% of cases were classified as false memories and another 23% were classified as having accepted the event to some degree. When the...
97 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the effects of additives on optimum pH range, horseradish-peroxidase saving, reaction stoichiometry and minimum additive requirements were investigated, and the fate of additive after reaction was also studied.
96 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore several of the theoretical issues related to the study of asexuality, including the importance of acknowledging asexual self-identification or lack thereof in future research.
Abstract: Academic interest in asexual people is new and researchers are beginning to discuss how to proceed methodologically and conceptually with the study of asexuality. This article explores several of the theoretical issues related to the study of asexuality. Researchers have tended to treat asexuality either as a distinct sexual orientation or as a lack of sexual orientation. Difficulties arise when asexual participants are inconsistent in their self-identification as asexual. Distinguishing between sexual and romantic attraction resolves this confusion, while simultaneously calling into question conceptualizations of the asexual population as a single homogenous group. Arguments are considered in favor of exploring diversity within the asexual population, particularly with respect to gender and romantic orientation, proposing that the categorical constructs employed in (a)sexuality research be replaced with continuous ones. Furthermore, given the recently noted bias toward including only self-identified asexuals, as opposed to non-self-identified asexuals or “potential-asexuals,” in research about asexuality, the nature and meaning of asexual self-identification are discussed. Particular attention is paid to the theoretical importance of acknowledging asexual self-identification or lack thereof in future research into asexuality. This article discusses what these current theoretical issues mean for the study of asexuality and sexuality more generally, including a brief consideration of ethical implications for research with asexual participants. Finally, directions for future research are suggested.
96 citations
••
TL;DR: The geodynamic origin of the Neoproterozoic ophiolites of the Arabian-Nubian Shield exposed in the Eastern Desert of Egypt remains controversial as mentioned in this paper.
96 citations
••
TL;DR: Wang et al. as mentioned in this paper identified the following seven critical factors, listed in descending order of influence, that cause customers to switch mobile phone service providers: core service failure, high price, ethical problems, competition, inconvenience, service encounter failure, and influence from family/friends/group.
96 citations
Authors
Showing all 10751 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Jie Zhang | 178 | 4857 | 221720 |
Robert E. W. Hancock | 152 | 775 | 88481 |
Michael Lynch | 112 | 422 | 63461 |
David Zhang | 111 | 1027 | 55118 |
Paul D. N. Hebert | 111 | 537 | 66288 |
Eleftherios P. Diamandis | 110 | 1064 | 52654 |
Qian Wang | 108 | 2148 | 65557 |
John W. Berry | 97 | 351 | 52470 |
Douglas W. Stephan | 89 | 663 | 34060 |
Rebecca Fisher | 86 | 255 | 50260 |
Mehdi Dehghan | 83 | 875 | 29225 |
Zhong-Qun Tian | 81 | 646 | 33168 |
Robert J. Letcher | 80 | 411 | 22778 |
Daniel J. Sexton | 76 | 369 | 25172 |
Bin Ren | 73 | 470 | 23452 |