scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Microbial abundance, activity and population genomic profiling with mOTUs2

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
mOTUs2, an updated and functionally extended profiling tool for microbial abundance, activity and population profiling, shows that mOTUs, which are based on essential housekeeping genes, are demonstrably well-suited for quantification of basal transcriptional activity of community members.
Abstract
Metagenomic sequencing has greatly improved our ability to profile the composition of environmental and host-associated microbial communities. However, the dependency of most methods on reference genomes, which are currently unavailable for a substantial fraction of microbial species, introduces estimation biases. We present an updated and functionally extended tool based on universal (i.e., reference-independent), phylogenetic marker gene (MG)-based operational taxonomic units (mOTUs) enabling the profiling of >7700 microbial species. As more than 30% of them could not previously be quantified at this taxonomic resolution, relative abundance estimates based on mOTUs are more accurate compared to other methods. As a new feature, we show that mOTUs, which are based on essential housekeeping genes, are demonstrably well-suited for quantification of basal transcriptional activity of community members. Furthermore, single nucleotide variation profiles estimated using mOTUs reflect those from whole genomes, which allows for comparing microbial strain populations (e.g., across different human body sites).

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-analysis of fecal metagenomes reveals global microbial signatures that are specific for colorectal cancer

TL;DR: A meta-analysis of eight geographically and technically diverse fecal shotgun metagenomic studies of colorectal cancer identified a core set of 29 species significantly enriched in CRC metagenomes, establishing globally generalizable, predictive taxonomic and functional microbiome CRC signatures as a basis for future diagnostics.
Journal ArticleDOI

MGnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020

TL;DR: An updated approach to data analysis has been unveiled (version 5.0), replacing the previous single pipeline with multiple analysis pipelines that are tailored according to the input data, and that are formally described using the Common Workflow Language, enabling greater provenance, reusability, and reproducibility.
Journal ArticleDOI

Benchmarking Metagenomics Tools for Taxonomic Classification.

TL;DR: The key metrics used to assess performance are described, a framework for the comparison of additional classifiers is offered, and the future of metagenomic data analysis is discussed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools

TL;DR: SAMtools as discussed by the authors implements various utilities for post-processing alignments in the SAM format, such as indexing, variant caller and alignment viewer, and thus provides universal tools for processing read alignments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform

TL;DR: Burrows-Wheeler Alignment tool (BWA) is implemented, a new read alignment package that is based on backward search with Burrows–Wheeler Transform (BWT), to efficiently align short sequencing reads against a large reference sequence such as the human genome, allowing mismatches and gaps.
Journal ArticleDOI

IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies

TL;DR: It is shown that a combination of hill-climbing approaches and a stochastic perturbation method can be time-efficiently implemented and found higher likelihoods between 62.2% and 87.1% of the studied alignments, thus efficiently exploring the tree-space.
Journal ArticleDOI

UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads

Robert C. Edgar
- 01 Oct 2013 - 
TL;DR: The UPARSE pipeline reports operational taxonomic unit (OTU) sequences with ≤1% incorrect bases in artificial microbial community tests, compared with >3% correct bases commonly reported by other methods.
Related Papers (5)