scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Goddard Space Flight Center

FacilityGreenbelt, Maryland, United States
About: Goddard Space Flight Center is a facility organization based out in Greenbelt, Maryland, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Galaxy & Solar wind. The organization has 19058 authors who have published 63344 publications receiving 2786037 citations. The organization is also known as: GSFC & Space Flight Center.
Topics: Galaxy, Solar wind, Magnetosphere, Stars, Population


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The MSIS-86 empirical model of thermospheric temperature, density and composition as discussed by the authors uses new temperature and composition data from the Dynamics Explorer satellite to improve the representation of polar region morphology over that in theMSIS-83 model.
Abstract: The MSIS-86 empirical model of thermospheric temperature, density and composition uses new temperature and composition data from the Dynamics Explorer satellite to improve the representation of polar region morphology over that in the MSIS-83 model. Terms were added or changed to better represent seasonal variations in the polar regions under both quiet and magnetically disturbed conditions. Local time variations in the magnetic activity effect were added. In addition a new species, atomic nitrogen, was added to the previous list of N2, O2, He, O, H, and Ar covered by the model.

1,699 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Landsat 8, a NASA and USGS collaboration, acquires global moderate-resolution measurements of the Earth's terrestrial and polar regions in the visible, near-infrared, short wave, and thermal infrared as mentioned in this paper.

1,697 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors measured star formation rates (SFRs) of 50,000 optically selected galaxies in the local universe (z ≈ 0.1) by fitting the GALEX (ultraviolet) and SDSS photometry to a library of dustattenuated population synthesis models.
Abstract: We measure star formation rates (SFRs) of ≈50,000 optically selected galaxies in the local universe (z ≈ 0.1)—from gas-rich dwarfs to massive ellipticals. We obtain dust-corrected SFRs by fitting the GALEX (ultraviolet) and SDSS photometry to a library of dust-attenuated population synthesis models. For star-forming galaxies, our UV-based SFRs compare remarkably well with those from SDSS-measured emission lines (Hα). Deviations from perfect agreement are shown to be due to differences in the dust attenuation estimates. In contrast to Hα measurements, UV provides reliable SFRs for galaxies with weak Hα, and where Hα is contaminated with AGN emission (1/2 of the sample). Using full-SED SFRs, we calibrate a simple prescription that uses GALEX far- and near-UV magnitudes to produce dust-corrected SFRs for normal star-forming galaxies. The specific SFR is considered as a function of stellar mass for (1) star-forming galaxies with no AGNs, (2) those hosting an AGN, and (3) galaxies without Hα emission. We find that the three have distinct star formation histories, with AGNs lying intermediate between the star-forming and the quiescent galaxies. Star-forming galaxies without an AGN lie on a relatively narrow linear sequence. Remarkably, galaxies hosting a strong AGN appear to represent the massive continuation of this sequence. On the other hand, weak AGNs, while also massive, have lower SFRs, sometimes extending to the realm of quiescent galaxies. We propose an evolutionary sequence for massive galaxies that smoothly connects normal star-forming galaxies to quiescent galaxies via strong and weak AGNs. We confirm that some galaxies with no Hα show signs of star formation in the UV. We derive a cosmic star formation density at z = 0.1 with significantly smaller total error than previous measurements.

1,694 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe the objectives of community efforts in improving the Noah land surface model (LSM), documents, through mathematical formulations, the augmented conceptual realism in biophysical and hydrological processes, and introduces a framework for multiple options to parameterize selected processes (Noah•MP).
Abstract: [1] This first paper of the two‐part series describes the objectives of the community efforts in improving the Noah land surface model (LSM), documents, through mathematical formulations, the augmented conceptual realism in biophysical and hydrological processes, and introduces a framework for multiple options to parameterize selected processes (Noah‐MP). The Noah‐MP’s performance is evaluated at various local sites using high temporal frequency data sets, and results show the advantages of using multiple optional schemes to interpret the differences in modeling simulations. The second paper focuses on ensemble evaluations with long‐term regional (basin) and global scale data sets. The enhanced conceptual realism includes (1) the vegetation canopy energy balance, (2) the layered snowpack, (3) frozen soil and infiltration, (4) soil moisture‐groundwater interaction and related runoff production, and (5) vegetation phenology. Sample local‐scale validations are conducted over the First International Satellite Land Surface Climatology Project (ISLSCP) Field Experiment (FIFE) site, the W3 catchment of Sleepers River, Vermont, and a French snow observation site. Noah‐MP shows apparent improvements in reproducing surface fluxes, skin temperature over dry periods, snow water equivalent (SWE), snow depth, and runoff over Noah LSM version 3.0. Noah‐MP improves the SWE simulations due to more accurate simulations of the diurnal variations of the snow skin temperature, which is critical for computing available energy for melting. Noah‐MP also improves the simulation of runoff peaks and timing by introducing a more permeable frozen soil and more accurate simulation of snowmelt. We also demonstrate that Noah‐MP is an effective research tool by which modeling results for a given process can be interpreted through multiple optional parameterization schemes in the same model framework.

1,682 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Bedmap2 as discussed by the authors is a suite of gridded products describing surface elevation, ice-thickness and the seafloor and subglacial bed elevation of the Antarctic south of 60° S. In particular, the Bedmap2 ice thickness grid is made from 25 million measurements, over two orders of magnitude more than were used in Bedmap1.
Abstract: We present Bedmap2, a new suite of gridded products describing surface elevation, ice-thickness and the seafloor and subglacial bed elevation of the Antarctic south of 60° S. We derived these products using data from a variety of sources, including many substantial surveys completed since the original Bedmap compilation (Bedmap1) in 2001. In particular, the Bedmap2 ice thickness grid is made from 25 million measurements, over two orders of magnitude more than were used in Bedmap1. In most parts of Antarctica the subglacial landscape is visible in much greater detail than was previously available and the improved data-coverage has in many areas revealed the full scale of mountain ranges, valleys, basins and troughs, only fragments of which were previously indicated in local surveys. The derived statistics for Bedmap2 show that the volume of ice contained in the Antarctic ice sheet (27 million km3) and its potential contribution to sea-level rise (58 m) are similar to those of Bedmap1, but the mean thickness of the ice sheet is 4.6% greater, the mean depth of the bed beneath the grounded ice sheet is 72 m lower and the area of ice sheet grounded on bed below sea level is increased by 10%. The Bedmap2 compilation highlights several areas beneath the ice sheet where the bed elevation is substantially lower than the deepest bed indicated by Bedmap1. These products, along with grids of data coverage and uncertainty, provide new opportunities for detailed modelling of the past and future evolution of the Antarctic ice sheets.

1,678 citations


Authors

Showing all 19247 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Anton M. Koekemoer1681127106796
Alexander S. Szalay166936145745
David W. Johnson1602714140778
Donald G. York160681156579
Takeo Kanade147799103237
Gillian R. Knapp145460121477
Olaf Reimer14471674359
R. A. Sunyaev141848107966
Christopher T. Russell137237897268
Hui Li1352982105903
Neil Gehrels13472780804
Christopher B. Field13340888930
Igor V. Moskalenko13254258182
William T. Reach13153590496
Adam Burrows13062355483
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Marshall Space Flight Center
14.5K papers, 324.4K citations

91% related

Jet Propulsion Laboratory
14.3K papers, 548.1K citations

90% related

National Center for Atmospheric Research
19.7K papers, 1.4M citations

90% related

California Institute of Technology
146.6K papers, 8.6M citations

88% related

United States Naval Research Laboratory
45.4K papers, 1.5M citations

86% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023186
2022327
20211,815
20202,153
20192,210
20182,325