Institution
Tata Memorial Hospital
Healthcare•Mumbai, India•
About: Tata Memorial Hospital is a healthcare organization based out in Mumbai, India. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Breast cancer. The organization has 3187 authors who have published 4636 publications receiving 109143 citations.
Topics: Cancer, Breast cancer, Population, Radiation therapy, Carcinoma
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Monash University1, Austin Hospital2, Karolinska Institutet3, Deakin University4, University of Helsinki5, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences6, University of Alberta7, Manchester Royal Infirmary8, Peking Union Medical College Hospital9, National University of La Plata10, University of Paris-Sud11, Ghent University Hospital12, Research Foundation - Flanders13, Innsbruck Medical University14, University of Rochester15, Mayo Clinic16, University of Pittsburgh17, Tata Memorial Hospital18, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University19, Charles University in Prague20, Monash University Malaysia Campus21, VU University Medical Center22, Copenhagen University Hospital23, Helsinki University Central Hospital24, Singapore General Hospital25, University of Chile26, Glasgow Royal Infirmary27, University of Jena28, Johannesburg Hospital29, University Hospital of Lausanne30, Jikei University School of Medicine31
TL;DR: In this article, the authors asked intensive care specialists in 30 countries to participate in an electronic questionnaire of their practice, definition, and expectations of fluid bolus therapy (FBT).
31 citations
••
TL;DR: The pharmacokinetic profile and B-cell response to Reditux™ are comparable with those reported for MabThera™ and can be substituted with RedItux™ for the treatment of B- cell lymphomas.
Abstract: Rituximab (MabThera™, Roche) is a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting the CD20 surface antigen on normal and neoplastic B cells. It revolutionized the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with superior progression-free and overall survival. However, its prohibitively high cost makes it inaccessible to majority of patients in developing countries. Reditux™ (Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, India), a biosimilar, was introduced in India in 2007 at nearly half the price of the innovator. However, there is a dearth of data regarding the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of Reditux™. Twenty-one patients of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma on R-CHOP regimen were enrolled for the study. Reditux™ was administered as a slow intravenous infusion at a dose of 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed at pre-dose, post-infusion, 24, 48 h, 7 and 21 days. Rituximab levels were estimated by ELISA. Population pharmacokinetics was performed using NONMEM. In addition, B-cell count was determined at baseline and days 3 and 21 of the first cycle. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier plots. The volume of distribution of central compartment and clearance of Reditux™ were estimated at 0.95 L and 5.98 mL/h, respectively. No covariate effects were seen. B-cell count was completely depleted by day 3 and remained so on day 21. Overall survival was 84.6 % at a median follow-up of 36 months. The pharmacokinetic profile and B-cell response to Reditux™ are comparable with those reported for MabThera™. Thus, MabThera™ can be substituted with Reditux™ for the treatment of B-cell lymphomas.
31 citations
••
TL;DR: The platinum and taxane doublet chemotherapy was found to be safe and effective in penile cancer patients with high-risk features of local failure and was well tolerated with grade 3-4 gastrointestinal toxicity seen in 1 patient.
Abstract: Aim: To study the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel and platinum doublet chemotherapy in penile cancer patients with high-risk features of local failure. Materials and Methods : Retrospective analysis was done of patients with 19 carcinoma of the penis who were offered adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum combination. The data regarding the surgical details, high-risk features for which chemotherapy was offered, chemotherapy toxicity details (in accordance with CTCAE vs 3), failure pattern, and survival data were noted. SPSS version 16 was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Results : Median age of patients was 48 years. Fifteen patients received paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin and four received paclitaxel with carboplatin in view of their low serum creatinine clearance. The treatment was completed by 12 patients (63.2%). Of 79 planned cycles, 50 were taken. The treatment was well tolerated with grade 3-4 gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 1 patient, grade 3 neurological toxicity in one and grade 5 neutropenia in one patient. Treatment related death occured in one patient. The median follow-up was 15.33 months and 6 loco-regional relapsed had taken place. The estimated median DFS was 16.2 months and the estimated median OS was not reached. The estimated DFS for treatment completed patients was 23.13 months as against 2.16 months for patients not completing treatment. Conclusion: The platinum and taxane doublet chemotherapy was found to be safe and effective.
31 citations
••
TL;DR: There was no influence on the incidence of seroma formation whether suction drain or corrugated drains were used, and the use of electrocautery in axillary dissection does not adversely affect postoperativeSeroma formation after surgery for breast cancer.
Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of surgical technique in the form of electrocautery and suction drains on seroma formation following surgery for breast cancer A prospective randomized study was carried out One hundred and sixty patients with breast cancer who underwent surgery were allocated to four arms using a 2 x 2 factorial design This method enabled us to evaluate the independent effect of two different causative factors on the incidence of postoperative seroma formation using a single dataset with limited numbers The main outcome measure was postoperative seroma formation defined as a postoperative axillary collection requiring more than one aspiration after removal of the drain The incidence of seroma in our institution is 90% Incidence of postoperative seroma was 883% if electrocautery was used, which reduced to 822% if surgery was carried out using scissors for dissection and ligatures for haemostasis (P = 0358) There was no influence on the incidence of seroma formation whether suction drain (846%) or corrugated drains (861%) were used (P = 0822) The use of electrocautery in axillary dissection does not adversely affect postoperative seroma formation after surgery for breast cancer The use of different drainage techniques has no bearing on the postoperative seroma formation The surgical technique has no influence on the rate of seroma formation after surgery for breast cancer
31 citations
••
TL;DR: Napsin A and WT1 are highly sensitive and specific IHC markers for diagnosing ovarian CCCs and HGSCs, respectively, and in differentiating these tumours from their mimics.
Abstract: Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the ovary is an uncommon, but an aggressive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), which has overlapping histopathologic features with other ovarian tumours. Lately, Napsin A has been identified as its useful diagnostic immunohistochemical (IHC) marker. Fifty-eight prospectively diagnosed ovarian CCCs, 53 high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs), 16 endometrioid adenocarcinomas (EMACs), six mixed carcinomas, containing components of CCC and EMAC, seven metastatic mucinous adenocarcinomas and six ovarian yolk sac tumours (YSTs) were tested for Napsin A immunostaining. Fifty ovarian CCCs, 50 HGSCs, seven ovarian EMACs and five mixed carcinomas were tested for WT1 immunostaining. Napsin A was positively expressed in all 58 (100%) CCCs; was focally positive in 1 of 6 YSTs; in 1/16 EMACs and in six cases of mixed carcinomas, while it was negative in all 53 HGSCs and in seven metastatic mucinous adenocarcinomas. Other IHC markers expressed in cases of CCC ovary were CK7 (31/31) (100%), WT1 (0/50), p53 (20/26, 'wild type'), ER (4/31, focal) (12.9%), PAX8 (14/14) (100%), glypican-3 (4/10, focal) (44.4%), p16INK4 (5/5, focal) and CK20 (0/5). Various IHC markers expressed in HGSCs were WT1 (48/50) (96%), p53 (31/31, mostly 'mutation type'), CK7 (9/9) (100%) ER (13/16, variable) (81.2%) and PAX8 (14/14) (100%). IHC markers expressed in EMACs were ER (15/16) (93.7%), CK7 (2/2) (100%) and WT1 (0/7). IHC markers expressed in mixed carcinomas were CK7 (2/2) (100%), WT1 (0/2), focal Napsin A (6/6) and focal ER (5/6). The sensitivity and specificity of Napsin A for the diagnosis of CCC ovary was 100% and 90.9%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of WT1 for diagnosis of HGSC ovary was found to be 96% and 100%, respectively. Napsin A and WT1 are highly sensitive and specific IHC markers for diagnosing ovarian CCCs and HGSCs, respectively, and in differentiating these tumours from their mimics. Napsin A is useful in identification of component of CCC in certain EMACs.
31 citations
Authors
Showing all 3213 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Al B. Benson | 113 | 578 | 48364 |
Keitaro Matsuo | 97 | 818 | 37349 |
Ashish K. Jha | 87 | 503 | 30020 |
Noopur Raje | 82 | 506 | 27878 |
Muthupandian Ashokkumar | 76 | 511 | 20771 |
Snehal G. Patel | 73 | 367 | 16905 |
Rainu Kaushal | 58 | 232 | 16794 |
Ajit S. Puri | 54 | 369 | 9948 |
Jasbir S. Arora | 51 | 351 | 15696 |
Sudeep Sarkar | 48 | 273 | 10087 |
Ian T. Magrath | 47 | 107 | 8084 |
Pankaj Chaturvedi | 45 | 325 | 15871 |
Pradeep Kumar Gupta | 44 | 416 | 7181 |
Shiv K. Gupta | 43 | 150 | 8911 |
Kikkeri N. Naresh | 43 | 245 | 6264 |