scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Tata Memorial Hospital

HealthcareMumbai, India
About: Tata Memorial Hospital is a healthcare organization based out in Mumbai, India. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Breast cancer. The organization has 3187 authors who have published 4636 publications receiving 109143 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A multidisciplinary, multinational panel of oncology, primary care, epidemiology, health economic, cancer control, public health, and patient advocacy experts produce recommendations reflecting four resource-tiered settings on the secondary prevention of cervical cancer globally.
Abstract: PurposeTo provide resource-stratified, evidence-based recommendations on the secondary prevention of cervical cancer globally.MethodsASCO convened a multidisciplinary, multinational panel of oncology, primary care, epidemiology, health economic, cancer control, public health, and patient advocacy experts to produce recommendations reflecting four resource-tiered settings. A review of existing guidelines, a formal consensus-based process, and a modified ADAPTE process to adapt existing guidelines were conducted. Other experts participated in formal consensus.ResultsSeven existing guidelines were identified and reviewed, and adapted recommendations form the evidence base. Four systematic reviews plus cost-effectiveness analyses provided indirect evidence to inform consensus, which resulted in ≥ 75% agreement.RecommendationsHuman papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is recommended in all resource settings; visual inspection with acetic acid may be used in basic settings. Recommended age ranges and frequencies by...

116 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The recommendations of screening for cervical cancer in the Indian scenario are discussed and various methods are available for treatment of cervical precancers and the selection will depend on the cost, morbidity, requirement of reliable biopsy specimens, resources available, etc.
Abstract: Cervical cancer still remains the most common cancer affecting the Indian women. India alone contributes 25.41% and 26.48% of the global burden of cervical cancer cases and mortality, respectively. Ironically, unlike most other cancers, cervical cancer can be prevented through screening by identifying and treating the precancerous lesions, any time during the course of its long natural history, thus preventing the potential progression to cervical carcinoma. Several screening methods, both traditional and newer technologies, are available to screen women for cervical precancers and cancers. No screening test is perfect and hence the choice of screening test will depend on the setting where it is to be used. Similarly, various methods are available for treatment of cervical precancers and the selection will depend on the cost, morbidity, requirement of reliable biopsy specimens, resources available, etc. The recommendations of screening for cervical cancer in the Indian scenario are discussed.

115 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: This review estimates that the approximate annual cancer burden of India in 2001 would include 17,730 cases of gallbladder cancer and 14,230 of pancreatic cancer, and suggests that the incidence of gall bladder cancer is very high in northern Indian cities and low in southern India.
Abstract: Pancreatic cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in developed countries. Gall bladder cancer is very common in South American countries, around the Mediterranean and in Japan. A majority of patients with these cancers receive only palliative therapy in spite of recent advances in investigation and surgery. Their poor prognosis and increasing incidence in India necessitate a better epidemiologic approach towards their control. This review is based on epidemiological data, publications and abstracts from India. Population-based data reveal that the incidence of gall bladder cancer is very high in northern Indian cities (5-7 per 100,000 women) and low (0-0.7 per 100,000 women) in southern India. The distribution suggests a high-incidence region comprising Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Orissa, West Bengal and Assam. The cancer is twice more common in women and is the leading cancer among digestive cancers in women in the northern Indian cities of Delhi and Bhopal. There are few analytical data to hypothesize why this geographical predisposition. The high incidence is also observed in north Indian immigrants to the United Kingdom. The incidence of pancreatic cancer is low (0.5-2.4 per 100,000 men and 0.2-1.8 per 100,000 women) in most parts of India. Somewhat higher rates are seen in the male urban populations of western and northern India. Studies from Kerala support an association between tropical pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Time trends reveal an increase in the incidence of gall bladder and pancreas cancers; the increase in the former is alarming. We estimate that the approximate annual cancer burden of India in 2001 would include 17,730 cases of gallbladder cancer and 14,230 of pancreatic cancer. Multi-center studies are needed to identify potentially preventable risk factors associated with gall bladder and pancreatic cancer in India.

115 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: At all levels, increasing breast cancer awareness, diagnosing breast cancer at an early stage, training individuals to perform and interpret breast biopsies, and collecting statistics about breast cancer, resources, and competing priorities may improve breast cancer outcomes in countries with limited resources.
Abstract: � Abstract: In 2002 the Breast Health Global Initiative (BHGI) convened a panel of breast cancer experts and patient advocates to develop consensus recommendations for diagnosing breast cancer in countries with limited resources. The panel agreed on the need for a pathologic diagnosis, based on microscopic evaluation of tissue specimens, before initiating breast cancer treatment. The panel discussed options for pathologic diagnosis (fine-needle aspiration biopsy, core needle biopsy, and surgical biopsy) and concluded that the choice among these methods should be based on available tools and expertise. Correlation of pathology, clinical, and imaging findings was emphasized. A 2005 BHGI panel reaffirmed these recommendations and additionally stratified diagnostic and pathology methods into four levels—basic, limited, enhanced, and maximal—from lowest to highest resources. The minimal requirements (basic level) include a history, clinical breast examination, tissue diagnosis, and medical record keeping. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy was recognized as the least expensive reliable method of tissue sampling, and the need for comparing its clinical usefulness with that of core needle biopsy in the limited-resource setting was emphasized. Increasing resources (limited level) may enable diagnostic breast imaging (ultrasound ± mammography), use of tests to evaluate for metastases, limited image-guided sampling, and hormone receptor testing. With more resources (enhanced level), diagnostic mammography, bone scanning, and an onsite cytologist may be possible. Mass screening mammography is introduced at the maximal-resource level. At all levels, increasing breast cancer awareness, diagnosing breast cancer at an early stage, training individuals to perform and interpret breast biopsies, and collecting statistics about breast cancer, resources, and competing priorities may improve breast cancer outcomes in countries with limited resources. Expertise in pathology was reaffirmed to be a key requirement for ensuring reliable diagnostic findings. Several approaches were again proposed for improving breast pathology, including training pathologists, establishing pathology services in centralized facilities, and organizing international pathology services. �

115 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Comparison of patient characteristics with published series from Western nations indicated that patients from all three Indian centres had more extensive disease at presentation, as measured by WBC, lymphadenopathy and organomegaly, and these findings have important implications for the treatment of ALL in countries of low socioeconomic status.

114 citations


Authors

Showing all 3213 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Al B. Benson11357848364
Keitaro Matsuo9781837349
Ashish K. Jha8750330020
Noopur Raje8250627878
Muthupandian Ashokkumar7651120771
Snehal G. Patel7336716905
Rainu Kaushal5823216794
Ajit S. Puri543699948
Jasbir S. Arora5135115696
Sudeep Sarkar4827310087
Ian T. Magrath471078084
Pankaj Chaturvedi4532515871
Pradeep Kumar Gupta444167181
Shiv K. Gupta431508911
Kikkeri N. Naresh432456264
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
40.1K papers, 640.4K citations

91% related

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
13.4K papers, 668.8K citations

87% related

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
65.3K papers, 4.4M citations

85% related

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
92.5K papers, 4.7M citations

85% related

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
9.8K papers, 458.8K citations

84% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20235
202232
2021223
2020244
2019206
2018239