scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Carnegie Mellon University

EducationPittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
About: Carnegie Mellon University is a education organization based out in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Computer science & Robot. The organization has 36317 authors who have published 104359 publications receiving 5975734 citations. The organization is also known as: CMU & Carnegie Mellon.


Papers
More filters
Proceedings Article
14 Jun 2011
TL;DR: In this article, a no-regret algorithm is proposed to find a policy with good performance under the distribution of observations it induces in such sequential settings, which can be seen as a no regret algorithm in an online learning setting.
Abstract: Sequential prediction problems such as imitation learning, where future observations depend on previous predictions (actions), violate the common i.i.d. assumptions made in statistical learning. This leads to poor performance in theory and often in practice. Some recent approaches (Daume III et al., 2009; Ross and Bagnell, 2010) provide stronger guarantees in this setting, but remain somewhat unsatisfactory as they train either non-stationary or stochastic policies and require a large number of iterations. In this paper, we propose a new iterative algorithm, which trains a stationary deterministic policy, that can be seen as a no regret algorithm in an online learning setting. We show that any such no regret algorithm, combined with additional reduction assumptions, must find a policy with good performance under the distribution of observations it induces in such sequential settings. We demonstrate that this new approach outperforms previous approaches on two challenging imitation learning problems and a benchmark sequence labeling problem.

1,499 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper presented a theoretical account of the sequence and duration of eye fixation during simple cognitive tasks, such as mental rotation, sentence verification, and quantitative comparison, and linked the eye fixation behavior to a processing model for the task by assuming that the eye fixates the referent of the symbol being operated on.

1,499 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is found that deep learning has yet to revolutionize biomedicine or definitively resolve any of the most pressing challenges in the field, but promising advances have been made on the prior state of the art.
Abstract: Deep learning describes a class of machine learning algorithms that are capable of combining raw inputs into layers of intermediate features. These algorithms have recently shown impressive results across a variety of domains. Biology and medicine are data-rich disciplines, but the data are complex and often ill-understood. Hence, deep learning techniques may be particularly well suited to solve problems of these fields. We examine applications of deep learning to a variety of biomedical problems-patient classification, fundamental biological processes and treatment of patients-and discuss whether deep learning will be able to transform these tasks or if the biomedical sphere poses unique challenges. Following from an extensive literature review, we find that deep learning has yet to revolutionize biomedicine or definitively resolve any of the most pressing challenges in the field, but promising advances have been made on the prior state of the art. Even though improvements over previous baselines have been modest in general, the recent progress indicates that deep learning methods will provide valuable means for speeding up or aiding human investigation. Though progress has been made linking a specific neural network's prediction to input features, understanding how users should interpret these models to make testable hypotheses about the system under study remains an open challenge. Furthermore, the limited amount of labelled data for training presents problems in some domains, as do legal and privacy constraints on work with sensitive health records. Nonetheless, we foresee deep learning enabling changes at both bench and bedside with the potential to transform several areas of biology and medicine.

1,491 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors trace the history of diffusion for 46 new products and examine the interrelations among diffusion, other aspects of technological change, price, output, and certain attributes of the relevant markets.
Abstract: This study attempts to measure and analyse the diffusion of product innovations. Diffusion is defined as the spread in the number of producers engaged in manufacturing a new product. Thus, the term refers to the net entry rate in the market for a new product. We trace the history of diffusion for 46 new products and examine the inter-relations among diffusion, other aspects of technological change, price, output, and certain attributes of the relevant markets. To explain the 46 product histories, we construct a theory of the development of industries for new products. Our theory combines elements of traditional, neoclassical models with what Nelson and Winter (I974) have termed an evolutionary theory. A novel feature is that the historical sequence, or time path, of events is viewed as a critical determinant of the ultimate structure of new product markets. Thus the time path of events determines not only the course traversed in reaching the end result but the ultimate market structure itself. The paper is organised in four sections. In Section I we present our theory. In Section II we construct a series of alternative theories of the development of industries for new products based on approaches to be found in received literature. The evidence from the 46 new product histories is examined in Section III. Finally, a brief summary of principal findings follows in Section IV.

1,487 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Aug 2004-Brain
TL;DR: The findings suggest that the neural basis of disordered language in autism entails a lower degree of information integration and synchronization across the large-scale cortical network for language processing.
Abstract: Summary The brain activation of a group of high-functioning autistic participants was measured using functional MRI during sentence comprehension and the results compared with those of a Verbal IQ-matched control group. The groups differed in the distribution of activation in two of the key language areas. The autism group produced reliably more activation than the control group in Wernicke’s (left laterosuperior temporal) area and reliably less activation than the control group in Broca’s (left inferior frontal gyrus) area. Furthermore, the functional connectivity, i.e. the degree of synchronization or correlation of the time series of the activation, between the various participating cortical areas was consistently lower for the autistic than the control participants. These findings suggest that the neural basis of disordered language in autism entails a lower degree of information integration and synchronization across the large-scale cortical network for language processing. The article presents a theoretical account of the findings, related to neurobiological foundations of underconnectivity in autism.

1,487 citations


Authors

Showing all 36645 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Yi Chen2174342293080
Rakesh K. Jain2001467177727
Robert C. Nichol187851162994
Michael I. Jordan1761016216204
Jasvinder A. Singh1762382223370
J. N. Butler1722525175561
P. Chang1702154151783
Krzysztof Matyjaszewski1691431128585
Yang Yang1642704144071
Geoffrey E. Hinton157414409047
Herbert A. Simon157745194597
Yongsun Kim1562588145619
Terrence J. Sejnowski155845117382
John B. Goodenough1511064113741
Scott Shenker150454118017
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
268K papers, 18.2M citations

95% related

University of Maryland, College Park
155.9K papers, 7.2M citations

93% related

University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

93% related

IBM
253.9K papers, 7.4M citations

93% related

Princeton University
146.7K papers, 9.1M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023120
2022499
20214,981
20205,375
20195,420
20184,972