Institution
Simón Bolívar University
Education•Caracas, Venezuela•
About: Simón Bolívar University is a education organization based out in Caracas, Venezuela. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Crystallization. The organization has 5912 authors who have published 8294 publications receiving 126152 citations.
Topics: Population, Crystallization, Context (language use), Nucleation, Differential scanning calorimetry
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, the current transient for three-dimensional nucleation on a finite number of active sites, followed by diffusion controlled growth, has been analyzed and the true nucleation rate per site can be obtained from the current maximum of single-step potentiostatic experiments.
533 citations
••
TL;DR: A global review of gaps in marine biodiversity knowledge and resources is overdue because society and many scientists believe the authors have discovered most species, or that doing so is out of fashion except when new technologies are employed.
Abstract: The resources available for research are always limited. When setting priorities for research funding, governments, industry, and funding agencies must balance the demands of human health, food supply, and standards of living, against the less-tangible benefits of discovering more about the planet's biodiversity. Scientists have discovered almost 2 million species indicating that we have made great gains in our knowledge of biodiversity. However, this knowledge may distract attention from the estimated four-fifths of species on Earth that remain unknown to science, many of them inhabiting our oceans [1], [2]. The world's media still find it newsworthy when new species are discovered [1]. However, the extent of this taxonomic challenge no longer appears to be a priority in many funding agencies, perhaps because society and many scientists believe we have discovered most species, or that doing so is out of fashion except when new technologies are employed. Another symptom of this trend may be that the increased attention to novel methods available in molecular sciences is resulting in a loss of expertise and know-how in the traditional descriptive taxonomy of species [3]. The use of molecular techniques complements traditional methods of describing species but has not significantly increased the rate of discovery of new species (at least of fish), although it may help classify them [4]. At least in Europe, there was a mismatch between the number of species in a taxon and the number of people with expertise in it [5]. Unfortunately, because most species remain to be discovered in the most species-rich taxa [2], [5], [6], [7], there are then few experts to appreciate that this work needs to be done. Evidently, a global review of gaps in marine biodiversity knowledge and resources is overdue.
History of discovering marine biodiversity
Although the economic exploitation of marine resources dates back to prehistoric times, and historical documentation has existed since the third century B.C. with Aristotle's contributions in the Mediterranean Sea (e.g. [8]), the establishment of systematic collections of marine organisms began only during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Global marine biodiversity investigations at these times depended not only on the availability of expertise, but also on foreign policies of the colonial powers of the time. For those reasons, the specimens collected from several regions (e.g., Caribbean, Japan, South America, Africa) were mostly brought to Europe, where they were described, deposited in museum collections, and used for the production of marine biological monographs. These early publications contained descriptions and checklists of many marine species, such as molluscs, crustaceans, fishes, turtles, birds, and mammals (e.g. [9], [10], [11]).
The history of research on marine biodiversity can generally be divided into three periods: early exploratory studies, local coastal “descriptive” studies, and large-scale multidisciplinary investigations and syntheses. These periods vary in timing by different seas and countries. The first exploratory studies in several regions (e.g., South America, Caribbean, South Africa, Pacific Ocean) took place from the mid-1700s until the late-1800s, in association with mainly European, North American, and Russian exploration expeditions, such as the Kamchatka Expedition in the 1740s, James Cook's voyages in the 1770s, the cruise of HMS Beagle in the 1830s, the voyage of HMS Challenger in the 1870s, and the first deep-sea investigations in the Mediterranean Sea [8], [9], [12], [13]. Pioneer investigations on deep-sea organisms were conducted in the Aegean Sea, where Forbes [14] noticed that sediments became progressively more impoverished in terms of biodiversity with increasing sampling depth. The azoic hypothesis proposed by Forbes suggested that life would be extinguished beyond 500 m depth, although a work published 68 years earlier provided indisputable evidence of the presence of life in the Gulf of Genoa at depths down to 1,000 m [15].
The taxonomists who described marine species at these times seldom collected specimens themselves in the field and, therefore, had only second-hand information about the distribution and ecology of the samples they received [4], [8]. Some of the early descriptions of tropical species thus do not even have the locality where the holotype or voucher material was collected (some examples in Chenu 1842–1853). The second period of regional studies was initiated by enhanced availability of research resources (experts, institutes, and vessels) in developing countries around the mid-1900s. The earliest institutions and research stations, many of which continue to operate, were founded in some areas as early as the late 1800s and early 1900s (e.g. [11], [16], [17]). Wide-scale establishment of laboratories in several continents (Europe, New Zealand, North and South America) have only been operational since the 1950s–1960s. The third stage, large-scale multidisciplinary investigations, has evolved since the 1990s, and is related to development and application of modern technologies and implementation of large, multinational research projects. Perhaps the largest of such investigations was the Census of Marine Life (Census).
522 citations
••
01 Aug 1979TL;DR: It is shown that the linear equalizer is in fact a portion of the D FE receiver and that the processing done by the DFE is exactly equivalent to the general problem of linear prediction.
Abstract: As real world communication channels are stressed with higher data rates, intersymbol interference (ISI) becomes a dominant limiting factor. One way to combat this effect that has recently received considerable attention is the use of a decision feedback equalizer (DFE) in the receiver. The action of the DFE is to feed back a weighted sum of past decision to cancel the ISI they cause in the present signaling interval. This paper summarizes the work in this area beginning with the linear equalizer. Three performance criteria have been used to derive optimum systems; 1) minimize the noise variance under a "zero forcing" (ZF) constraint i.e., insist that all intersymbol interference is cancelled, 2) minimize the mean-square error (MMSE) between the true sample and the observed signal just prior to the decision threshold, and 3) minimize the probability of error (Min P e ). The transmitter can be fixed and the receiver optimized or one can obtain the joint optimum transmitter and receiver. The number of past decisions used in the feedback equalization can be finite or infinite. The infinite case is easier to handle analytically. In addition to reviewing the work done in the area, we show that the linear equalizer is in fact a portion of the DFE receiver and that the processing done by the DFE is exactly equivalent to the general problem of linear prediction. Other similarities in the various system structures are also shown. The effect of error propagation due to incorrect decisions is discussed, and the coaxial cable channel is used as an example to demonstrate the improvement available using DFE.
501 citations
••
University of Edinburgh1, Macquarie University2, Wake Forest University3, National Centre for Biological Sciences4, University of Leeds5, Goethe University Frankfurt6, University of Otago7, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research8, University of the Witwatersrand9, North Carolina State University10, South Dakota State University11, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation12, University of Queensland13, University of Brasília14, Charles Darwin University15, Venezuelan Institute for Scientific Research16, Simón Bolívar University17, University of Toulouse18, University of Tasmania19, University of Cape Town20
TL;DR: Using data from 2154 sites in savannas across Africa, Australia, and South America, it is found that increasing moisture availability drives increases in fire and tree basal area, whereas fire reduces tree basal Area.
Abstract: Ecologists have long sought to understand the factors controlling the structure of savanna vegetation. Using data from 2154 sites in savannas across Africa, Australia, and South America, we found that increasing moisture availability drives increases in fire and tree basal area, whereas fire reduces tree basal area. However, among continents, the magnitude of these effects varied substantially, so that a single model cannot adequately represent savanna woody biomass across these regions. Historical and environmental differences drive the regional variation in the functional relationships between woody vegetation, fire, and climate. These same differences will determine the regional responses of vegetation to future climates, with implications for global carbon stocks.
500 citations
••
The Chinese University of Hong Kong1, City University of Hong Kong2, University of Macau3, Simón Bolívar University4, University of Tokyo5, University of Osnabrück6, California State University, Chico7, University of Vienna8, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven9, University of Alberta10, University of Guelph11, Chinese Academy of Sciences12, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic13, Charles University in Prague14, Pedagogical University15, Åbo Akademi University16, University of Lyon17, Tbilisi State University18, International University, Cambodia19, Hong Kong Polytechnic University20, Hungarian Academy of Sciences21, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens22, University of Delhi23, Indian Statistical Institute24, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad25, Padjadjaran University26, University of Haifa27, University of Padua28, Seowon University29, University of Latvia30, American University of Beirut31, Universiti Sains Malaysia32, Universiti Malaysia Sabah33, Tilburg University34, Victoria University of Wellington35, University of Lagos36, University of Bergen37, University of Peshawar38, University of the Philippines39, University of Porto40, University of Minho41, Russian Academy of Sciences42, University of Cape Town43, Autonomous University of Madrid44, National Taiwan University45, Assumption University46, Boğaziçi University47, University College London48, University of Greenwich49
TL;DR: Leung et al. as mentioned in this paper revealed a five-dimensional structure of social axioms across individuals from five cultural groups across 41 nations and revealed the culture level factor structure and its correlates across 41 cultures.
Abstract: Leung and colleagues have revealed a five-dimensional structure of social axioms across individuals from five cultural groups. The present research was designed to reveal the culture level factor structure of social axioms and its correlates across 41 nations. An ecological factor analysis on the 60 items of the Social Axioms Survey extracted two factors: Dynamic Externality correlates with value measures tapping collectivism, hierarchy, and conservatism and with national indices indicative of lower social development. Societal Cynicism is less strongly and broadly correlated with previous values measures or other national indices and seems to define a novel cultural syndrome. Its national correlates suggest that it taps the cognitive component of a cultural constellation labeled maleficence, a cultural syndrome associated with a general mistrust of social systems and other people. Discussion focused on the meaning of these national level factors of beliefs and on their relationships with individual level factors of belief derived from the same data set.
443 citations
Authors
Showing all 5925 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Franco Nori | 114 | 1117 | 63808 |
Ignacio Rodriguez-Iturbe | 96 | 334 | 32283 |
Ian W. Hamley | 78 | 469 | 25800 |
Francisco Zaera | 73 | 432 | 19907 |
Thomas G. Habetler | 73 | 395 | 20725 |
Douglas L. Jones | 70 | 512 | 21596 |
I. Taboada | 66 | 346 | 13528 |
Enrique Herrero | 64 | 242 | 11653 |
Rudi Studer | 60 | 268 | 19876 |
Alejandro J. Müller | 58 | 420 | 12410 |
David Padua | 58 | 243 | 11155 |
Rudolf Jaffé | 58 | 182 | 10268 |
Luis Balicas | 57 | 328 | 14114 |
Volker Abetz | 55 | 386 | 11583 |
Ananias A. Escalante | 51 | 160 | 8866 |