scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Simón Bolívar University

EducationCaracas, Venezuela
About: Simón Bolívar University is a education organization based out in Caracas, Venezuela. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Crystallization. The organization has 5912 authors who have published 8294 publications receiving 126152 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the current transient for three-dimensional nucleation on a finite number of active sites, followed by diffusion controlled growth, has been analyzed and the true nucleation rate per site can be obtained from the current maximum of single-step potentiostatic experiments.

533 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
02 Aug 2010-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: A global review of gaps in marine biodiversity knowledge and resources is overdue because society and many scientists believe the authors have discovered most species, or that doing so is out of fashion except when new technologies are employed.
Abstract: The resources available for research are always limited. When setting priorities for research funding, governments, industry, and funding agencies must balance the demands of human health, food supply, and standards of living, against the less-tangible benefits of discovering more about the planet's biodiversity. Scientists have discovered almost 2 million species indicating that we have made great gains in our knowledge of biodiversity. However, this knowledge may distract attention from the estimated four-fifths of species on Earth that remain unknown to science, many of them inhabiting our oceans [1], [2]. The world's media still find it newsworthy when new species are discovered [1]. However, the extent of this taxonomic challenge no longer appears to be a priority in many funding agencies, perhaps because society and many scientists believe we have discovered most species, or that doing so is out of fashion except when new technologies are employed. Another symptom of this trend may be that the increased attention to novel methods available in molecular sciences is resulting in a loss of expertise and know-how in the traditional descriptive taxonomy of species [3]. The use of molecular techniques complements traditional methods of describing species but has not significantly increased the rate of discovery of new species (at least of fish), although it may help classify them [4]. At least in Europe, there was a mismatch between the number of species in a taxon and the number of people with expertise in it [5]. Unfortunately, because most species remain to be discovered in the most species-rich taxa [2], [5], [6], [7], there are then few experts to appreciate that this work needs to be done. Evidently, a global review of gaps in marine biodiversity knowledge and resources is overdue. History of discovering marine biodiversity Although the economic exploitation of marine resources dates back to prehistoric times, and historical documentation has existed since the third century B.C. with Aristotle's contributions in the Mediterranean Sea (e.g. [8]), the establishment of systematic collections of marine organisms began only during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Global marine biodiversity investigations at these times depended not only on the availability of expertise, but also on foreign policies of the colonial powers of the time. For those reasons, the specimens collected from several regions (e.g., Caribbean, Japan, South America, Africa) were mostly brought to Europe, where they were described, deposited in museum collections, and used for the production of marine biological monographs. These early publications contained descriptions and checklists of many marine species, such as molluscs, crustaceans, fishes, turtles, birds, and mammals (e.g. [9], [10], [11]). The history of research on marine biodiversity can generally be divided into three periods: early exploratory studies, local coastal “descriptive” studies, and large-scale multidisciplinary investigations and syntheses. These periods vary in timing by different seas and countries. The first exploratory studies in several regions (e.g., South America, Caribbean, South Africa, Pacific Ocean) took place from the mid-1700s until the late-1800s, in association with mainly European, North American, and Russian exploration expeditions, such as the Kamchatka Expedition in the 1740s, James Cook's voyages in the 1770s, the cruise of HMS Beagle in the 1830s, the voyage of HMS Challenger in the 1870s, and the first deep-sea investigations in the Mediterranean Sea [8], [9], [12], [13]. Pioneer investigations on deep-sea organisms were conducted in the Aegean Sea, where Forbes [14] noticed that sediments became progressively more impoverished in terms of biodiversity with increasing sampling depth. The azoic hypothesis proposed by Forbes suggested that life would be extinguished beyond 500 m depth, although a work published 68 years earlier provided indisputable evidence of the presence of life in the Gulf of Genoa at depths down to 1,000 m [15]. The taxonomists who described marine species at these times seldom collected specimens themselves in the field and, therefore, had only second-hand information about the distribution and ecology of the samples they received [4], [8]. Some of the early descriptions of tropical species thus do not even have the locality where the holotype or voucher material was collected (some examples in Chenu 1842–1853). The second period of regional studies was initiated by enhanced availability of research resources (experts, institutes, and vessels) in developing countries around the mid-1900s. The earliest institutions and research stations, many of which continue to operate, were founded in some areas as early as the late 1800s and early 1900s (e.g. [11], [16], [17]). Wide-scale establishment of laboratories in several continents (Europe, New Zealand, North and South America) have only been operational since the 1950s–1960s. The third stage, large-scale multidisciplinary investigations, has evolved since the 1990s, and is related to development and application of modern technologies and implementation of large, multinational research projects. Perhaps the largest of such investigations was the Census of Marine Life (Census).

522 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Aug 1979
TL;DR: It is shown that the linear equalizer is in fact a portion of the D FE receiver and that the processing done by the DFE is exactly equivalent to the general problem of linear prediction.
Abstract: As real world communication channels are stressed with higher data rates, intersymbol interference (ISI) becomes a dominant limiting factor. One way to combat this effect that has recently received considerable attention is the use of a decision feedback equalizer (DFE) in the receiver. The action of the DFE is to feed back a weighted sum of past decision to cancel the ISI they cause in the present signaling interval. This paper summarizes the work in this area beginning with the linear equalizer. Three performance criteria have been used to derive optimum systems; 1) minimize the noise variance under a "zero forcing" (ZF) constraint i.e., insist that all intersymbol interference is cancelled, 2) minimize the mean-square error (MMSE) between the true sample and the observed signal just prior to the decision threshold, and 3) minimize the probability of error (Min P e ). The transmitter can be fixed and the receiver optimized or one can obtain the joint optimum transmitter and receiver. The number of past decisions used in the feedback equalization can be finite or infinite. The infinite case is easier to handle analytically. In addition to reviewing the work done in the area, we show that the linear equalizer is in fact a portion of the DFE receiver and that the processing done by the DFE is exactly equivalent to the general problem of linear prediction. Other similarities in the various system structures are also shown. The effect of error propagation due to incorrect decisions is discussed, and the coaxial cable channel is used as an example to demonstrate the improvement available using DFE.

501 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
31 Jan 2014-Science
TL;DR: Using data from 2154 sites in savannas across Africa, Australia, and South America, it is found that increasing moisture availability drives increases in fire and tree basal area, whereas fire reduces tree basal Area.
Abstract: Ecologists have long sought to understand the factors controlling the structure of savanna vegetation. Using data from 2154 sites in savannas across Africa, Australia, and South America, we found that increasing moisture availability drives increases in fire and tree basal area, whereas fire reduces tree basal area. However, among continents, the magnitude of these effects varied substantially, so that a single model cannot adequately represent savanna woody biomass across these regions. Historical and environmental differences drive the regional variation in the functional relationships between woody vegetation, fire, and climate. These same differences will determine the regional responses of vegetation to future climates, with implications for global carbon stocks.

500 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Leung et al. as mentioned in this paper revealed a five-dimensional structure of social axioms across individuals from five cultural groups across 41 nations and revealed the culture level factor structure and its correlates across 41 cultures.
Abstract: Leung and colleagues have revealed a five-dimensional structure of social axioms across individuals from five cultural groups. The present research was designed to reveal the culture level factor structure of social axioms and its correlates across 41 nations. An ecological factor analysis on the 60 items of the Social Axioms Survey extracted two factors: Dynamic Externality correlates with value measures tapping collectivism, hierarchy, and conservatism and with national indices indicative of lower social development. Societal Cynicism is less strongly and broadly correlated with previous values measures or other national indices and seems to define a novel cultural syndrome. Its national correlates suggest that it taps the cognitive component of a cultural constellation labeled maleficence, a cultural syndrome associated with a general mistrust of social systems and other people. Discussion focused on the meaning of these national level factors of beliefs and on their relationships with individual level factors of belief derived from the same data set.

443 citations


Authors

Showing all 5925 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Franco Nori114111763808
Ignacio Rodriguez-Iturbe9633432283
Ian W. Hamley7846925800
Francisco Zaera7343219907
Thomas G. Habetler7339520725
Douglas L. Jones7051221596
I. Taboada6634613528
Enrique Herrero6424211653
Rudi Studer6026819876
Alejandro J. Müller5842012410
David Padua5824311155
Rudolf Jaffé5818210268
Luis Balicas5732814114
Volker Abetz5538611583
Ananias A. Escalante511608866
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of the Basque Country
49.6K papers, 1M citations

87% related

Complutense University of Madrid
90.2K papers, 2.1M citations

86% related

National Autonomous University of Mexico
127.7K papers, 2.2M citations

86% related

University of Granada
59.2K papers, 1.4M citations

86% related

Autonomous University of Madrid
52.8K papers, 1.6M citations

85% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20232
202220
2021286
2020384
2019340
2018312