scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Tata Institute of Fundamental Research

EducationMumbai, Maharashtra, India
About: Tata Institute of Fundamental Research is a education organization based out in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Magnetization & Large Hadron Collider. The organization has 7786 authors who have published 21742 publications receiving 622368 citations. The organization is also known as: TIFR.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Vardan Khachatryan1, Albert M. Sirunyan1, Armen Tumasyan1, Wolfgang Adam  +2333 moreInstitutions (195)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors acknowledge the enduring support for the construction and operation of the LHC and the CMS detector provided by the following funding agencies:======BMWFW and FWF (Austria); FNRS and FWO (Belgium); CNPq, CAPES, FAPERJ,======And FAPESP (Brazil); MES (Bulgaria); CERN; CAS, MoST, and NSFC (China); COLCIENCIAS======(Colombia); MSES and CSF (Croatia); RPF (
Abstract: we acknowledge the enduring support for the construction and operation of the LHC and the CMS detector provided by the following funding agencies: BMWFW and FWF (Austria); FNRS and FWO (Belgium); CNPq, CAPES, FAPERJ, and FAPESP (Brazil); MES (Bulgaria); CERN; CAS, MoST, and NSFC (China); COLCIENCIAS (Colombia); MSES and CSF (Croatia); RPF (Cyprus); SENESCYT (Ecuador); MoER, ERC IUT and ERDF (Estonia); Academy of Finland, MEC, and HIP (Finland); CEA and CNRS/IN2P3 (France); BMBF, DFG, and HGF (Germany); GSRT (Greece); OTKA and NIH (Hungary); DAE and DST (India); IPM (Iran); SFI (Ireland); INFN (Italy); MSIP and NRF (Republic of Korea); LAS (Lithuania); MOE and UM (Malaysia); BUAP, CINVESTAV, CONACYT, LNS, SEP, and UASLP-FAI (Mexico); MBIE (New Zealand); PAEC (Pakistan); MSHE and NSC (Poland); FCT (Portugal); JINR (Dubna); MON, RosAtom, RAS and RFBR (Russia); MESTD (Serbia); SEIDI and CPAN (Spain); Swiss Funding Agencies (Switzerland); MST (Taipei); ThEPCenter, IPST, STAR and NSTDA (Thailand); TUBITAK and TAEK (Turkey); NASU and SFFR (Ukraine); STFC (United Kingdom); DOE and NSF (U.S.A.).

292 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
A. Bandyopadhyay1, Sandhya Choubey1, Raj Gandhi1, Srubabati Goswami1, B.L. Roberts2, J. Bouchez, I. Antoniadis3, John Ellis3, Gian F. Giudice3, T. Schwetz3, S. Umasankar, G. Karagiorgi4, Alexis A. Aguilar-Arevalo4, Janet Conrad4, M. H. Shaevitz4, Silvia Pascoli5, S. Geer6, J.E. Campagne7, Mark Rolinec8, A. Blondel9, Manuela Campanelli9, Joachim Kopp10, Manfred Lindner10, J.T. Peltoniemi, P. J. Dornan11, Kenneth Long11, Takashi Matsushita11, C. Rogers11, Y. Uchida11, Marcos Dracos, K. Whisnant12, David William Casper13, Mingshui Chen13, B. A. Popov14, Juha Äystö15, Danny Marfatia16, Y. Okada17, H. Sugiyama17, Klaus-Peter Jungmann18, Julien Lesgourgues, Michael S. Zisman19, Mariam Tórtola20, Alexander Friedland21, Sacha Davidson22, Stefan Antusch23, C. Biggio23, Andrea Donini23, Enrique Fernandez-Martinez23, Belen Gavela23, Michele Maltoni23, Jacobo Lopez-Pavon23, Stefano Rigolin23, N. K. Mondal24, V. Palladino, Frank Filthaut, Carl H. Albright25, A. de Gouvea26, Yoshitaka Kuno27, Y. Nagashima27, M. Mezzetto, S. Lola28, Paul Langacker29, A. Baldini, Hiroshi Nunokawa30, Davide Meloni31, Michel Diaz32, Stephen F. King33, Kai Zuber34, A.G. Akeroyd35, Y. Grossman36, Yasaman Farzan, Kazuhiro Tobe37, Mayumi Aoki38, Hitoshi Murayama19, Hitoshi Murayama39, Hitoshi Murayama40, N. Kitazawa41, Osamu Yasuda41, S.T. Petcov42, Andrea Romanino42, P. Chimenti43, Andrea Vacchi43, A. Yu. Smirnov44, Elena Couce45, J.J. Gómez-Cadenas45, Pilar Hernández45, M. Sorel45, José W. F. Valle45, Paul Fraser Harrison46, Cecilia Lunardini47, J.K. Nelson48, Vernon Barger49, Lisa L. Everett49, Patrick Huber49, Walter Winter50, W. Fetscher51, A. van der Schaaf52 
Harish-Chandra Research Institute1, Boston University2, CERN3, Columbia University4, Durham University5, Fermilab6, University of Paris-Sud7, Technische Universität München8, University of Geneva9, Max Planck Society10, Imperial College London11, Iowa State University12, University of California, Irvine13, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research14, University of Jyväskylä15, University of Kansas16, KEK17, University of Groningen18, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory19, Instituto Superior Técnico20, Los Alamos National Laboratory21, Lyon College22, Autonomous University of Madrid23, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research24, Northern Illinois University25, Northwestern University26, Osaka University27, University of Patras28, University of Pennsylvania29, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro30, Sapienza University of Rome31, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile32, University of Southampton33, University of Sussex34, National Cheng Kung University35, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology36, Tohoku University37, University of Tokyo38, University of California, Berkeley39, Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe40, Tokyo Metropolitan University41, International School for Advanced Studies42, University of Trieste43, International Centre for Theoretical Physics44, Spanish National Research Council45, University of Warwick46, University of Washington47, College of William & Mary48, University of Wisconsin-Madison49, University of Würzburg50, ETH Zurich51, University of Zurich52
TL;DR: The conclusions of the Physics Working Group of the International Scoping Study of a future Neutrino Factory and super-beam facility (the ISS) are presented in this article.
Abstract: The conclusions of the Physics Working Group of the International Scoping Study of a future Neutrino Factory and super-beam facility (the ISS) are presented. The ISS was carried out by the international community between NuFact05, (the 7th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories and Super-beams, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Rome, 21–26 June 2005) and NuFact06 (Ivine, CA, 24–30 August 2006). The physics case for an extensive experimental programme to understand the properties of the neutrino is presented and the role of high-precision measurements of neutrino oscillations within this programme is discussed in detail. The performance of second-generation super-beam experiments, beta-beam facilities and the Neutrino Factory are evaluated and a quantitative comparison of the discovery potential of the three classes of facility is presented. High-precision studies of the properties of the muon are complementary to the study of neutrino oscillations. The Neutrino Factory has the potential to provide extremely intense muon beams and the physics potential of such beams is discussed in the final section of the report.

290 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Albert M. Sirunyan, Armen Tumasyan, Wolfgang Adam1, Federico Ambrogi1  +2294 moreInstitutions (194)
TL;DR: In this paper, the Higgs boson mass was measured in the H → ZZ → 4l (l = e, μ) decay channel and the signal strength modifiers for individual Higgs production modes were also measured.
Abstract: Properties of the Higgs boson are measured in the H → ZZ → 4l (l = e, μ) decay channel. A data sample of proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s}=13 $ TeV, collected with the CMS detector at the LHC and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{−1}$ is used. The signal strength modifier μ, defined as the ratio of the observed Higgs boson rate in the H → ZZ → 4l decay channel to the standard model expectation, is measured to be μ = 1.05$_{− 0.17}^{+ 0.19}$ at m$_{H}$ = 125.09 GeV, the combined ATLAS and CMS measurement of the Higgs boson mass. The signal strength modifiers for the individual Higgs boson production modes are also measured. The cross section in the fiducial phase space defined by the requirements on lepton kinematics and event topology is measured to be 2. 92$_{− 0.44}^{+ 0.48}$ (stat)$_{− 0.24}^{+ 0.28}$ (syst)fb, which is compatible with the standard model prediction of 2.76 ± 0.14 fb. Differential cross sections are reported as a function of the transverse momentum of the Higgs boson, the number of associated jets, and the transverse momentum of the leading associated jet. The Higgs boson mass is measured to be m$_{H}$ = 125.26 ± 0.21 GeV and the width is constrained using the on-shell invariant mass distribution to be Γ$_{H}$ < 1.10 GeV, at 95% confidence level.

290 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that the naked singularities form at the center of the collapsing cloud in a wide class of collapse models, which includes the earlier cases considered by Eardley and Smarr and Christodoulou.
Abstract: We investigate here the occurrence and nature of a naked singularity for the inhomogeneous gravitational collapse of Tolman-Bondi dust clouds. It is shown that the naked singularities form at the center of the collapsing cloud in a wide class of collapse models, which includes the earlier cases considered by Eardley and Smarr and Christodoulou. This class also contains self-similar as well as non-self-similar models. The structure and strength of this singularity are examined, and the question is investigated as to when a nonzero measure set of nonspacelike trajectories could be emitted from the singularity, as opposed to isolated trajectories coming out. It is seen that the weak energy condition and positivity of energy density ensures that the families of nonspacelike trajectories come out of the singularity. The curvature strength of the naked singularity is examined, which provides an important test for its physical significance. This is done in terms of the strong curvature condition, which ensures that all the volume forms must be crushed to zero size in the limit of approach to the singularity, and, also, the divergence of the Kretschmann scalar $\mathcal{K}={R}^{\mathrm{abcd}}{R}_{\mathrm{abcd}}$ is pointed out. We show that the class considered here contains subclasses of solutions which admit strong curvature naked singularities in either of the senses stated above. The conditions are discussed for the naked singularity to be globally naked. An implication for the fundamental issue of the final fate of gravitational collapse is that naked singularities need not be considered as artifacts of geometric symmetries of space-time such as self-similarity, but arise in a wide range of gravitational collapse scenarios once the inhomogeneities in the matter distribution are taken into account. It is argued that a physical formulation for the cosmic censorship may be evolved which avoids the features above. Possibilities in this direction are suggested while indicating that the analysis presented here should be useful for any possible rigorous formulation of the cosmic censorship hypothesis.

289 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the second-order and third-order azimuthal anisotropy harmonics of unidentified charged particles, as well as v2v2 of View the MathML sourceKS0 and ViewTheMathML sourceΛ/Λ ǫ particles, are extracted from long-range two-particle correlations as functions of particle multiplicity and transverse momentum.

288 citations


Authors

Showing all 7857 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Pulickel M. Ajayan1761223136241
Suvadeep Bose154960129071
Subir Sarkar1491542144614
Sw. Banerjee1461906124364
Dipanwita Dutta1431651103866
Ajit Kumar Mohanty141112493062
Tariq Aziz138164696586
Andrew Mehta1371444101810
Suchandra Dutta134126587709
Kajari Mazumdar134129594253
Bobby Samir Acharya1331121100545
Gobinda Majumder133152387732
Eric Conte132120684593
Prashant Shukla131134185287
Alessandro Montanari131138793071
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Max Planck Society
406.2K papers, 19.5M citations

90% related

University of Paris-Sud
52.7K papers, 2.1M citations

90% related

Los Alamos National Laboratory
74.6K papers, 2.9M citations

90% related

Brookhaven National Laboratory
39.4K papers, 1.7M citations

89% related

Weizmann Institute of Science
54.5K papers, 3M citations

89% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202322
2022128
2021939
20201,085
20191,100
20181,040