Open AccessBook
Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills
TLDR
In this paper, a text first published in 1975, discusses group dynamics, experiential learning, group goals and social interdependence, communication, leadership, decision making, controversy and creativity, conflicts of interest, power, diversity, team development, and leading growth and counseling for counseling.Abstract:
New edition of a text first published in 1975. Covers group dynamics, experiential learning, group goals and social interdependence, communication, leadership, decision making, controversy and creativity, conflicts of interest, power, diversity, team development, and leading growth and counseling grread more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
When group work leaves the classroom does group skills development also go out the window
TL;DR: Whether Information and Communication Technologies are ‘robust’ enough to support, sustain and address industry, employer and government calls for greater attention to group skills development in university graduates is asked.
Journal ArticleDOI
Civil Political Discourse In A Democracy: The Contribution Of Psychology
TL;DR: In this article, a political decision is reached through the following procedure: Citizens form advocacy groups and present the best case possible for the alternative course of action t.r.t.
Journal Article
Inside Supplemental Instruction Sessions: One Model of What Happens that Improves Grades and Retention.
Journal ArticleDOI
Situational policing: neighbourhood development and crime control
TL;DR: In this paper, the concept of situational policing is introduced as a way to address both the development of collective efficacy and the occurrence of crime and disorder in each neighbourhood type, and four neighbourhood types: Strong, Vulnerable, Anomic and Responsive.
Journal ArticleDOI
Status Differentiation and Information Exchange in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Idea Generation*
TL;DR: This paper found that the proportion of "data/fact" messages in total messages exchanged was significantly larger in the SD groups in both experiments and that SU groups also were more likely to exchange positive evaluations and to sustain periods of ideation in silence.