Regional and global sea-surface temperatures during the last interglaciation
read more
Citations
Impacts of 1.5°C Global Warming on Natural and Human Systems
Young People's Burden: Requirement of Negative CO2 Emissions
The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 2: Two interglacials, scientific objective and experimental design for Holocene and Last Interglacial simulations
Palaeoclimate constraints on the impact of 2 °C anthropogenic warming and beyond
Young People's Burden: Requirement of Negative CO2 Emissions
References
Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century
A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records
Age dating and the orbital theory of the ice ages: Development of a high-resolution 0 to 300,000-year chronostratigraphy
Macintosh Program performs time‐series analysis
Related Papers (5)
Orbital and Millennial Antarctic Climate Variability over the Past 800,000 Years
Frequently Asked Questions (11)
Q2. How long did the SSTs stay near this level?
SSTs remained near this level until 120 ka, when they then experienced a cooling trend that continued through the remainder of the LIG.
Q3. What is the LIG’s role in climate change?
As such, the LIG provides an important target for validating global climate models used for climate-change projections (3, 4), as well as for understanding the sea-level response to a warm climate.
Q4. What is the effect of the obliquity forcing on the seesaw?
Subsequent high-latitude cooling through the remainder of theLIG (Fig. 1) then likely occurred in response to the dominant obliquity forcing (Fig. 1C) and associated feedbacks (4, 29).
Q5. What is the corresponding temperature in the LIG?
Their results confirm that LIG global mean annual surface temperatures simulated with most global climate models forced with LIG boundary conditions (insolation and greenhouse gas concentrations) are too low (3, 4), with a multimodel estimate of 0.0° ± 0.5°C at 125 ka (21) as compared to 0.5° ± 0.3°C in their SST reconstruction.
Q6. What is the corresponding age model for each reference core?
The authors assigned the corresponding age model from each reference core to its benthic foraminiferal oxygen isotope (d18O) record (fig. S6), which was then used for alignment with benthic d18O records from other cores in each basin (12) to account for potential interbasin variability in benthic d18O (13–15).
Q7. What is the average temperature of the ocean?
These model estimates yield an equilibrium sea-level change in the range of 0.42 to 0.64 m °C−1, suggesting a thermosteric contribution to the LIG sea-level high stand of 0.08 to 0.51 m.
Q8. What DOE contract was awarded to the Oak Ridge National Laboratory?
This research used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract no.
Q9. What is the effect of the sea-ice feedback on the SH extratropics?
At the same time, the thermal memory of the seesaw response in the SH extratropics, likely associated with sea-ice retreat (27, 28), combined with CO2 forcing (Fig. 1D) to sustain warm SSTs there, thus resulting in the symmetrical high-latitude warming seen in their reconstruction (Figs. 2B and 3), as well as the warmer global SSTs than those simulated in global climate models that do not include the sea-ice feedback (3, 4).
Q10. What is the corresponding trend of the global SST?
There is a continuation of a warming trend from the penultimate deglaciation until 125 ka, when SSTs reached 0.5° ± 0.3°C relative to the 1870–1889 mean and were indistinguishable (0.1° ± 0.3°C) from the 1995–2014 mean (Fig. 1E).
Q11. How did the simulation reproduce the asymmetric temperature signal?
In particular, a global climatemodel simulation for 130 ka reproduced this asymmetric temperature signal by perturbing the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC)withHoffman et al., Science 355, 276-279 (2017) 20 January 2017 2 of 4Fig.