Institution
Langley Research Center
Facility•Hampton, Virginia, United States•
About: Langley Research Center is a facility organization based out in Hampton, Virginia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Mach number & Wind tunnel. The organization has 15945 authors who have published 37602 publications receiving 821623 citations. The organization is also known as: NASA Langley & NASA Langley Research Center.
Topics: Mach number, Wind tunnel, Aerodynamics, Boundary layer, Supersonic speed
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, the controllability and observability grammars in limited time and frequency intervals are used for model reduction in stable and unstable systems, and a near-optimal model reduction procedure is proposed.
Abstract: The controllability and observability gramians in limited time and frequency intervals are studied, and used for model reduction. In balanced and modal coordinates, a near – optimal reduction procedure is used, vielding the reduction error (norm of the different between the output of the orginal system and the reduced model) almost minimal. Several examples are given to illustrate the concept of model reduction in limited time or/and frequency intervals, for continuous- and discrete-time systems, as well as stable and unstable systems. In modal coordinates, the reduced model obtained from a stable system is always stable. In balanced coordinates it is not necessarily true, and stability conditions for the balanced reduced model are presented. Finally, model reduction is applied to advanced supersonic transport and a flexible truss structure.
237 citations
••
TL;DR: The basic concept of the Eigensystem Realization Algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction is extended to minimize the distortion of the identified parameters caused by noise.
Abstract: The basic concept of the Eigensystem Realization Algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction is extended to minimize the distortion of the identified parameters caused by noise. The mathematical foundation for the properties of accuracy indicators, such as the singular values of the data matrix and modal amplitude coherence, is provided, based on knowledge of the noise characteristics. These indicators quantitatively discriminate noise from system information and are used to reduce the realized system model to a better approximation of the true model. Monte Carlo Simulations are included to support the analytical studies.
237 citations
••
01 Sep 1996TL;DR: The present investigation focuses on application of the collaborative optimization architecutre to the multidisciplinary design of a single-stage-to-orbit launch vehicle, demonstrating the difference between minimum weight and minimum cost concepts.
Abstract: Collaborative optimization is a new design architecture specifically created for large-scale distributed-analysis applications. In this approach, a problem is decomposed into a user-defined number of subspace optimization problems that are driven towards interdisciplinary compatibility and the appropriate solution by a system-level coordination process. This decentralized design strategy allows domain-specific issues to be accommodated by disciplinary analysts, while requiring interdisciplinary decisions to be reached by consensus. The present investigation focuses on application of the collaborative optimization architecutre to the multidisciplinary design of a single-stage-to-orbit launch vehicle. Vehicle design, trajectory, and cost issues are directly modeled. Posed to suit the collaborative architecture, the design problem is characterized by 95 design variables and 16 constraints. Numerous collaborative solutions are obtained. Comparison of these solutions demonstrates the influence which an a priori ascent-abort criterion has on development cost. Similarly, objective-function selection is discussed, demonstrating the difference between minimum weight and minimum cost concepts. The operational advantages of the collaborative optimization architecutre in a multidisciplinary design environment are also discussed.
236 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, a height-resolved global distribution of dust aerosols is presented for the first time, based on the first year of CALIPSO lidar measurements under cloud-free conditions, and the results indicate that spring is the most active dust season, during which ∼20% and ∼12% of areas between 0 and 60°N are influenced by dust at least 10% and 50% of the time, respectively.
Abstract: [1] Based on the first year of CALIPSO lidar measurements under cloud-free conditions, a height-resolved global distribution of dust aerosols is presented for the first time. Results indicate that spring is the most active dust season, during which ∼20% and ∼12% of areas between 0 and 60°N are influenced by dust at least 10% and 50% of the time, respectively. In summer within 3–6 km, ∼8.3% of area between 0 and 60°N is impacted by dust at least 50% of the time. Strong seasonal cycles of dust layer vertical extent are observed in major source regions, which are similar to the seasonal variation of the thermally driven boundary layer depth. The arid and semiarid areas in North Africa and the Arabian Peninsula are the most persistent and prolific dust sources. African dust is transported across the Atlantic all yearlong with strong seasonal variation in the transport pathways mainly in the free troposphere in summer and at the low altitudes in winter. However, the trans-Atlantic dust is transported at the low altitudes is important for all seasons, especially transported further cross the ocean. The crossing Atlantic dusty zones are shifted southward from summer to winter, which is accompanied by a similar southward shift of dust-generating areas over North Africa. The Taklimakan and Gobi deserts are two major dust sources in East Asia with long-range transport mainly occurring in spring. The large horizontal and vertical coverage of dust aerosols indicate their importance in the climate system through both direct and indirect aerosol effects.
236 citations
••
TL;DR: Sreenivasan et al. as discussed by the authors examined data on the Kolmogorov spectrum constant in numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence, using results both from previous studies and from new direct numerical simulations over a range of Reynolds numbers at grid resolutions up to 5123.
Abstract: Motivated by a recent survey of experimental data [K.R. Sreenivasan, Phys. Fluids, 2778 (1995)], we examine data on the Kolmogorov spectrum constant in numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence, using results both from previous studies and from new direct numerical simulations over a range of Reynolds numbers (up to 240 on the Taylor scale) at grid resolutions up to 5123. It is noted that in addition to k-5/3 scaling, identification of a true inertial range requires spectral isotropy in the same wavenumber range. We found that a plateau in the compensated three-dimensional energy spectrum at k eta ~ 0.1--0.2 , commonly used to infer the Kolmogorov constant from the compensated three-dimensional energy spectrum, actually does not represent proper inertial range behavior. Rather, a proper, if still approximate, inertial range emerges at k eta ~ 0.02-0.05 when R>sub /sub sub /sub sub /sub sub /sub< ~ 0.53 for C =1.62, in excellent agreement with experiments. However the one- and three-dimensional estimates are not fully consistent, because of departures (due to numerical and statistical limitations) from isotropy of the computed spectra at low wavenumbers. The inertial scaling of structure functions in physical space is briefly addressed. Since DNS is still restricted to moderate Reynolds numbers, an accurate evaluation of the Kolmogorov constant is very difficult. We focus on providing new insights on the interpretation of Kolmogorov 1941 similarity in the DNS literature and do not consider issues pertaining to the refined similarity hypotheses of Kolmogorov.
236 citations
Authors
Showing all 16015 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Daniel J. Jacob | 162 | 656 | 76530 |
Donald R. Blake | 118 | 727 | 49697 |
Veerabhadran Ramanathan | 100 | 301 | 47561 |
Raja Parasuraman | 91 | 402 | 41455 |
Robert W. Platt | 88 | 638 | 31918 |
James M. Russell | 87 | 691 | 29383 |
Daniel J. Inman | 83 | 918 | 37920 |
Antony Jameson | 79 | 474 | 31518 |
Ya-Ping Sun | 79 | 277 | 28722 |
Patrick M. Crill | 79 | 228 | 20850 |
Richard B. Miles | 78 | 759 | 25239 |
Patrick Minnis | 77 | 490 | 23403 |
Robert W. Talbot | 77 | 297 | 19783 |
Raphael T. Haftka | 76 | 773 | 28111 |
Jack E. Dibb | 75 | 344 | 18399 |