scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Langley Research Center

FacilityHampton, Virginia, United States
About: Langley Research Center is a facility organization based out in Hampton, Virginia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Mach number & Wind tunnel. The organization has 15945 authors who have published 37602 publications receiving 821623 citations. The organization is also known as: NASA Langley & NASA Langley Research Center.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a general circulation model (GCM) study is presented in which cloud radiative properties are computed from cloud liquid water content inferred from the GCM hydrological cycle.
Abstract: A general circulation model (GCM) study is presented in which cloud radiative properties are computed from cloud liquid water content inferred from the GCM hydrological cycle. Model-generated and satellite albedos are in rough agreement. Analysis of the cloud radiative forcing indicates that cloud albedo effects overcome cloud infrared opacity effects in most regions. Both computed and observed albedo of clouds decrease from low to high altitudes. The model with variable cloud optics produces significantly different regional albedos from the same one with fixed cloud optics, especially over the tropics. The cloud droplet size distribution also has a significant impact on the model albedos. The temperature of the tropical upper troposphere is somewhat sensitive to the microphysical characteristics of the model cirrus clouds.

185 citations

01 Feb 1992
TL;DR: In this article, the mixed-mode bending (MMB) test was used to measure the delamination toughness of a brittle epoxy composite, a state-of-the-art toughened epoxy composites, and a tough thermoplastic composite over the full mixed mode range.
Abstract: Many different failure criteria have been suggested for mixed-mode delamination toughness, but few sets of mixed-mode data exist that are consistent over the full mode I opening to mode II shear load range. The mixed-mode bending (MMB) test was used to measure the delamination toughness of a brittle epoxy composite, a state-of-the-art toughened epoxy composite, and a tough thermoplastic composite over the full mixed- mode range. To gain insight into the different failure responses of the different materials, the delamination fracture surfaces were also examined. An evaluation of several failure criteria which have been reported in the literature was performed, and the range of responses modeled by each criterion was analyzed. A new bilinear failure criterion was developed based on a change in the failure mechanism observed from the delamination surfaces. The different criteria were compared to the failure response of the three materials tested. The responses of the two epoxies were best modeled with the new bilinear failure criterion. The failure response of the tough thermoplastic composite could be modeled well with the bilinear criterion but could also be modeled with the more simple linear failure criterion. Since the materials differed in their mixed-mode failure response, mixed-mode delamination testing will be needed to characterize a composite material. This paper provides a critical evaluation of the mixed-mode failure criteria and should provide general guidance for selecting an appropriate criterion for other materials.

184 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the status and some recent developments in the application of reduction methods to nonlinear structural mechanics problems are summarized and a number of research areas which have high potential for application of the reduction methods are identified.

184 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the CFORS/STEM-2K1 regional-scale chemical transport model is used to represent the aircraft observations, and the mean values of all the model parameters in the lowest 1 km are predicted within ±30% of the observed values.
Abstract: [1] Data obtained during the TRACE-P experiment is used to evaluate how well the CFORS/STEM-2K1 regional-scale chemical transport model is able to represent the aircraft observations. Thirty-one calculated trace gas and aerosol parameters are presented and compared to the in situ data. The regional model is shown to accurately predict many of the important features observed. The mean values of all the model parameters in the lowest 1 km are predicted within ±30% of the observed values. The correlation coefficients (R) for the meteorological parameters are found to be higher than those for the trace species. For example, for temperature, R > 0.98. Among the trace species, ethane, propane, and ozone show the highest values (0.8 < R < 0.9), followed by CO, SO2, and NOy. NO and NO2 had the lowest values (R < 0.4). Analyses of pollutant transport into the Yellow Sea by frontal events are presented and illustrate the complex nature of outflow. Biomass burning from SE Asia is transported in the warm conveyor belt at altitudes above ∼2 km and at latitudes below 30N. Outflow of pollution emitted along the east coast of China in the postfrontal regions is typically confined to the lower ∼2 km and results in high concentrations with plume-like features in the Yellow Sea. During these situations the model underpredicts CO and black carbon (among other species). An analysis of ozone production in this region is also presented. In and around the highly industrialized regions of East Asia, where fossil fuel usage dominates, ozone is NMHC-limited. South of ∼30–35N, ozone production is NOx-limited, reflecting the high NMHC/NOx ratios due to the large contributions to the emissions from biomass burning, biogenics sources, and biofuel usage in central China and SE Asia.

184 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors assess the standard operational NO2 data product (OMNO2, version 2.1) retrieved from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) onboard NASA's Aura satellite using a combination of aircraft and surface in-situ measurements as well as ground-based column measurements at several locations and a bottom-up NOx emission inventory over the continental US.
Abstract: . We assess the standard operational nitrogen dioxide (NO2) data product (OMNO2, version 2.1) retrieved from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) onboard NASA's Aura satellite using a combination of aircraft and surface in~situ measurements as well as ground-based column measurements at several locations and a bottom-up NOx emission inventory over the continental US. Despite considerable sampling differences, NO2 vertical column densities from OMI are modestly correlated (r = 0.3–0.8) with in situ measurements of tropospheric NO2 from aircraft, ground-based observations of NO2 columns from MAX-DOAS and Pandora instruments, in situ surface NO2 measurements from photolytic converter instruments, and a bottom-up NOx emission inventory. Overall, OMI retrievals tend to be lower in urban regions and higher in remote areas, but generally agree with other measurements to within ± 20%. No consistent seasonal bias is evident. Contrasting results between different data sets reveal complexities behind NO2 validation. Since validation data sets are scarce and are limited in space and time, validation of the global product is still limited in scope by spatial and temporal coverage and retrieval conditions. Monthly mean vertical NO2 profile shapes from the Global Modeling Initiative (GMI) chemistry-transport model (CTM) used in the OMI retrievals are highly consistent with in situ aircraft measurements, but these measured profiles exhibit considerable day-to-day variation, affecting the retrieved daily NO2 columns by up to 40%. This assessment of OMI tropospheric NO2 columns, together with the comparison of OMI-retrieved and model-simulated NO2 columns, could offer diagnostic evaluation of the model.

184 citations


Authors

Showing all 16015 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Daniel J. Jacob16265676530
Donald R. Blake11872749697
Veerabhadran Ramanathan10030147561
Raja Parasuraman9140241455
Robert W. Platt8863831918
James M. Russell8769129383
Daniel J. Inman8391837920
Antony Jameson7947431518
Ya-Ping Sun7927728722
Patrick M. Crill7922820850
Richard B. Miles7875925239
Patrick Minnis7749023403
Robert W. Talbot7729719783
Raphael T. Haftka7677328111
Jack E. Dibb7534418399
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Ames Research Center
35.8K papers, 1.3M citations

89% related

German Aerospace Center
26.7K papers, 553.3K citations

89% related

Air Force Research Laboratory
24.6K papers, 493.8K citations

87% related

United States Naval Research Laboratory
45.4K papers, 1.5M citations

85% related

Jet Propulsion Laboratory
14.3K papers, 548.1K citations

85% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202335
202286
2021571
2020540
2019669
2018797