scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

National Institute of Amazonian Research

FacilityManaus, Brazil
About: National Institute of Amazonian Research is a facility organization based out in Manaus, Brazil. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Amazon rainforest. The organization has 3129 authors who have published 6414 publications receiving 145086 citations. The organization is also known as: INPA & Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
20 Oct 2011-Nature
TL;DR: It is found that biodiversity values were substantially lower in degraded forests, but that this varied considerably by geographic region, taxonomic group, ecological metric and disturbance type.
Abstract: Human-driven land-use changes increasingly threaten biodiversity, particularly in tropical forests where both species diversity and human pressures on natural environments are high. The rapid conversion of tropical forests for agriculture, timber production and other uses has generated vast, human-dominated landscapes with potentially dire consequences for tropical biodiversity. Today, few truly undisturbed tropical forests exist, whereas those degraded by repeated logging and fires, as well as secondary and plantation forests, are rapidly expanding. Here we provide a global assessment of the impact of disturbance and land conversion on biodiversity in tropical forests using a meta-analysis of 138 studies. We analysed 2,220 pairwise comparisons of biodiversity values in primary forests (with little or no human disturbance) and disturbed forests. We found that biodiversity values were substantially lower in degraded forests, but that this varied considerably by geographic region, taxonomic group, ecological metric and disturbance type. Even after partly accounting for confounding colonization and succession effects due to the composition of surrounding habitats, isolation and time since disturbance, we find that most forms of forest degradation have an overwhelmingly detrimental effect on tropical biodiversity. Our results clearly indicate that when it comes to maintaining tropical biodiversity, there is no substitute for primary forests.

1,640 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors synthesized key findings from the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project, the world's largest and longest-running experimental study of habitat fragmentation, and found that fragmentation is highly eclectic, altering species richness and abundances, species invasions, forest dynamics, the trophic structure of communities, and a variety of ecological and ecosystem processes.
Abstract: We synthesized key findings from the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project, the world's largest and longest-running experimental study of habitat fragmentation. Although initially designed to assess the influence of fragment area on Amazonian biotas, the project has yielded insights that go far beyond the orig- inal scope of the study. Results suggest that edge effects play a key role in fragment dynamics, that the matrix has a major influence on fragment connectivity and functioning, and that many Amazonian species avoid even small ( � 100-m-wide) clearings. The effects of fragmentation are highly eclectic, altering species richness and abundances, species invasions, forest dynamics, the trophic structure of communities, and a variety of ecological and ecosystem processes. Moreover, forest fragmentation appears to interact synergistically with ecological changes such as hunting, fires, and logging, collectively posing an even greater threat to the rainforest biota. Descomposicion del Ecosistema en Fragmentos de Bosque Amazonico, Una Investigacion de 22 Anos Resumen: Sintetizamos resultados clave del proyecto sobre Dinamicas Biologicas de Fragmentos de bosque, el estudio experimental sobre fragmentacion del habitat mas largo y de mayor trayectoria del mundo. A pesar de que inicialmente el proyecto se diseno para evaluar la influencia del area de fragmentos en biotas del Amazo- nas, ha proporcionado un entendimiento que va mas alla del proposito original del estudio. Los resultados sugieren que los efectos de borde juegan un papel clave en las dinamicas de los fragmentos, que la matriz tiene una influencia mayor sobre la conectividad y el funcionamiento del fragmento y que muchas de las especies del Amazonas evitan areas taladas pequenas (de hasta � 100 m de ancho). Los efectos de la fragmentacion son al- tamente eclecticos, alterando la riqueza y abundancia de especies, las invasiones de especies, las dinamicas del bosque, la estructura trofica comunitaria y una variedad de procesos ecologicos y del ecosistema. Mas aun, la fragmentacion del bosque aparentemente interactua sinergisticamente con cambios ecologicos como lo son la caza, los incendios y la tala, representando colectivamente una gran amenaza sobre la biota del bosque lluvioso.

1,637 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Nuno R. Faria, Thomas A. Mellan1, Charles Whittaker1, Ingra Morales Claro2, Darlan da Silva Candido2, Darlan da Silva Candido3, Swapnil Mishra1, Myuki A E Crispim, Flavia C. S. Sales2, Iwona Hawryluk1, John T. McCrone4, Ruben J.G. Hulswit3, Lucas A M Franco2, Mariana S. Ramundo2, Jaqueline Goes de Jesus2, Pamela S Andrade2, Thais M. Coletti2, Giulia M. Ferreira5, Camila A. M. Silva2, Erika R. Manuli2, Rafael Henrique Moraes Pereira, Pedro S. Peixoto2, Moritz U. G. Kraemer3, Nelson Gaburo, Cecilia da C. Camilo, Henrique Hoeltgebaum1, William Marciel de Souza2, Esmenia C. Rocha2, Leandro Marques de Souza2, Mariana C. Pinho2, Leonardo José Tadeu de Araújo6, Frederico S V Malta, Aline B. de Lima, Joice do P. Silva, Danielle A G Zauli, Alessandro C. S. Ferreira, Ricardo P Schnekenberg3, Daniel J Laydon1, Patrick G T Walker1, Hannah M. Schlüter1, Ana L. P. dos Santos, Maria S. Vidal, Valentina S. Del Caro, Rosinaldo M. F. Filho, Helem M. dos Santos, Renato Santana Aguiar7, José Luiz Proença-Módena8, Bruce Walker Nelson9, James A. Hay10, Melodie Monod1, Xenia Miscouridou1, Helen Coupland1, Raphael Sonabend1, Michaela A. C. Vollmer1, Axel Gandy1, Carlos A. Prete2, Vitor H. Nascimento2, Marc A. Suchard11, Thomas A. Bowden3, Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond12, Chieh-Hsi Wu13, Oliver Ratmann1, Neil M. Ferguson1, Christopher Dye3, Nicholas J. Loman14, Philippe Lemey15, Andrew Rambaut4, Nelson Abrahim Fraiji, Maria Perpétuo Socorro Sampaio Carvalho, Oliver G. Pybus16, Oliver G. Pybus3, Seth Flaxman1, Samir Bhatt17, Samir Bhatt1, Ester Cerdeira Sabino2 
21 May 2021-Science
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used a two-category dynamical model that integrates genomic and mortality data to estimate that P.1 may be 1.7-to 2.4-fold more transmissible and that previous (non-P.1) infection provides 54 to 79% of the protection against infection with P.
Abstract: Cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in Manaus, Brazil, resurged in late 2020 despite previously high levels of infection. Genome sequencing of viruses sampled in Manaus between November 2020 and January 2021 revealed the emergence and circulation of a novel SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern. Lineage P.1 acquired 17 mutations, including a trio in the spike protein (K417T, E484K, and N501Y) associated with increased binding to the human ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) receptor. Molecular clock analysis shows that P.1 emergence occurred around mid-November 2020 and was preceded by a period of faster molecular evolution. Using a two-category dynamical model that integrates genomic and mortality data, we estimate that P.1 may be 1.7- to 2.4-fold more transmissible and that previous (non-P.1) infection provides 54 to 79% of the protection against infection with P.1 that it provides against non-P.1 lineages. Enhanced global genomic surveillance of variants of concern, which may exhibit increased transmissibility and/or immune evasion, is critical to accelerate pandemic responsiveness.

985 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Hans ter Steege1, Hans ter Steege2, Nigel C. A. Pitman3, Daniel Sabatier4, Christopher Baraloto5, Rafael de Paiva Salomão6, Juan Ernesto Guevara7, Oliver L. Phillips8, Carolina V. Castilho9, William E. Magnusson10, Jean-François Molino4, Abel Monteagudo, Percy Núñez Vargas11, Juan Carlos Montero10, Ted R. Feldpausch12, Ted R. Feldpausch8, Eurídice N. Honorio Coronado8, Timothy J. Killeen13, Bonifacio Mostacedo14, Rodolfo Vasquez, Rafael L. Assis10, Rafael L. Assis15, John Terborgh3, Florian Wittmann16, Ana Andrade10, William F. Laurance17, Susan G. Laurance17, Beatriz Schwantes Marimon18, Ben Hur Marimon18, Ima Célia Guimarães Vieira6, Iêda Leão do Amaral10, Roel J. W. Brienen8, Hernán Castellanos, Dairon Cárdenas López, Joost F. Duivenvoorden19, Hugo Mogollón20, Francisca Dionízia de Almeida Matos10, Nállarett Dávila21, Roosevelt García-Villacorta22, Pablo Roberto Stevenson Diaz23, Flávia R. C. Costa10, Thaise Emilio10, Carolina Levis10, Juliana Schietti10, Priscila Souza10, Alfonso Alonso24, Francisco Dallmeier24, Álvaro Javier Duque Montoya25, Maria Teresa Fernandez Piedade10, Alejandro Araujo-Murakami, Luzmila Arroyo, Rogério Gribel, Paul V. A. Fine7, Carlos A. Peres26, Marisol Toledo14, A C Gerardo Aymard, Timothy R. Baker8, Carlos Cerón27, Julien Engel28, Terry W. Henkel29, Paul J. M. Maas2, Pascal Petronelli, Juliana Stropp, Charles E. Zartman10, Doug Daly30, David A. Neill, Marcos Silveira31, Marcos Ríos Paredes, Jérôme Chave32, Diogenes de Andrade Lima Filho10, Peter M. Jørgensen33, Alfredo F. Fuentes33, Jochen Schöngart16, Fernando Cornejo Valverde34, Anthony Di Fiore35, E. M. Jimenez25, Maria Cristina Peñuela Mora25, Juan Fernando Phillips, Gonzalo Rivas36, Tinde van Andel2, Patricio von Hildebrand, Bruce Hoffman2, Egleé L. Zent37, Yadvinder Malhi38, Adriana Prieto25, Agustín Rudas25, Ademir R. Ruschell9, Natalino Silva39, Vincent A. Vos, Stanford Zent37, Alexandre Adalardo de Oliveira40, Angela Cano Schutz23, Therany Gonzales34, Marcelo Trindade Nascimento41, Hirma Ramírez-Angulo23, Rodrigo Sierra, Milton Tirado, Maria Natalia Umaña Medina23, Geertje M. F. van der Heijden42, Geertje M. F. van der Heijden43, César I.A. Vela11, Emilio Vilanova Torre23, Corine Vriesendorp, Ophelia Wang44, Kenneth R. Young35, Cláudia Baider40, Henrik Balslev45, Cid Ferreira10, Italo Mesones7, Armando Torres-Lezama23, Ligia Estela Urrego Giraldo25, Roderick Zagt46, Miguel Alexiades47, Lionel Hernández, Isau Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, William Milliken48, Walter Palacios Cuenca, Daniela Pauletto, Elvis H. Valderrama Sandoval49, Elvis H. Valderrama Sandoval50, Luis Valenzuela Gamarra, Kyle G. Dexter22, Kenneth J. Feeley51, Kenneth J. Feeley52, Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez8, Miles R. Silman53 
Utrecht University1, Naturalis2, Duke University3, Institut de recherche pour le développement4, Institut national de la recherche agronomique5, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi6, University of California, Berkeley7, University of Leeds8, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária9, National Institute of Amazonian Research10, National University of Saint Anthony the Abbot in Cuzco11, University of Exeter12, World Wide Fund for Nature13, Universidad Autónoma Gabriel René Moreno14, Norwegian University of Life Sciences15, Max Planck Society16, James Cook University17, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso18, University of Amsterdam19, Silver Spring Networks20, State University of Campinas21, University of Edinburgh22, University of Los Andes23, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute24, National University of Colombia25, University of East Anglia26, Central University of Ecuador27, Centre national de la recherche scientifique28, Humboldt State University29, New York Botanical Garden30, Universidade Federal do Acre31, Paul Sabatier University32, Missouri Botanical Garden33, Amazon.com34, University of Texas at Austin35, University of Florida36, Venezuelan Institute for Scientific Research37, Environmental Change Institute38, Federal Rural University of Amazonia39, University of São Paulo40, State University of Norte Fluminense41, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute42, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee43, Northern Arizona University44, Aarhus University45, Tropenbos International46, University of Kent47, Royal Botanic Gardens48, Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana49, University of Missouri–St. Louis50, Florida International University51, Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden52, Wake Forest University53
18 Oct 2013-Science
TL;DR: The finding that Amazonia is dominated by just 227 tree species implies that most biogeochemical cycling in the world’s largest tropical forest is performed by a tiny sliver of its diversity.
Abstract: The vast extent of the Amazon Basin has historically restricted the study of its tree communities to the local and regional scales. Here, we provide empirical data on the commonness, rarity, and richness of lowland tree species across the entire Amazon Basin and Guiana Shield (Amazonia), collected in 1170 tree plots in all major forest types. Extrapolations suggest that Amazonia harbors roughly 16,000 tree species, of which just 227 (1.4%) account for half of all trees. Most of these are habitat specialists and only dominant in one or two regions of the basin. We discuss some implications of the finding that a small group of species—less diverse than the North American tree flora—accounts for half of the world’s most diverse tree community.

963 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
13 Sep 2012-Nature
TL;DR: These findings suggest that tropical protected areas are often intimately linked ecologically to their surrounding habitats, and that a failure to stem broad-scale loss and degradation of such habitats could sharply increase the likelihood of serious biodiversity declines.
Abstract: The rapid disruption of tropical forests probably imperils global biodiversity more than any other contemporary phenomenon(1-3). With deforestation advancing quickly, protected areas are increasingly becoming final refuges for threatened species and natural ecosystem processes. However, many protected areas in the tropics are themselves vulnerable to human encroachment and other environmental stresses(4-9). As pressures mount, it is vital to know whether existing reserves can sustain their biodiversity. A critical constraint in addressing this question has been that data describing a broad array of biodiversity groups have been unavailable for a sufficiently large and representative sample of reserves. Here we present a uniquely comprehensive data set on changes over the past 20 to 30 years in 31 functional groups of species and 21 potential drivers of environmental change, for 60 protected areas stratified across the world's major tropical regions. Our analysis reveals great variation in reserve 'health': about half of all reserves have been effective or performed passably, but the rest are experiencing an erosion of biodiversity that is often alarmingly widespread taxonomically and functionally. Habitat disruption, hunting and forest-product exploitation were the strongest predictors of declining reserve health. Crucially, environmental changes immediately outside reserves seemed nearly as important as those inside in determining their ecological fate, with changes inside reserves strongly mirroring those occurring around them. These findings suggest that tropical protected areas are often intimately linked ecologically to their surrounding habitats, and that a failure to stem broad-scale loss and degradation of such habitats could sharply increase the likelihood of serious biodiversity declines.

962 citations


Authors

Showing all 3153 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
William F. Laurance11847056464
Yadvinder Malhi11553953605
Chris M. Wood10279543076
Oliver L. Phillips9833650569
Philip M. Fearnside8537724776
Lourens Poorter8421526671
Sandra Brown8019131923
Wolfgang J. Junk6321917508
David S. Battisti6218418851
Susan G. Laurance5915418494
Thomas E. Lovejoy5617022092
Carlos A. Silva5576517298
Christopher Baraloto5515212493
María Uriarte5417312485
Ted R. Feldpausch5213312166
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Sao Paulo State University
100.4K papers, 1.3M citations

79% related

Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
89.1K papers, 1.5M citations

79% related

James Cook University
27.7K papers, 1M citations

79% related

Leibniz Association
35.6K papers, 1M citations

79% related

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
89.4K papers, 1.4M citations

78% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202314
202231
2021450
2020431
2019396
2018338