scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of California, Irvine

EducationIrvine, California, United States
About: University of California, Irvine is a education organization based out in Irvine, California, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Galaxy. The organization has 47031 authors who have published 113602 publications receiving 5521832 citations. The organization is also known as: UC Irvine & UCI.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2) as discussed by the authors is the most recent version of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMEI) coupled model.
Abstract: An overview of the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2) is provided, including a discussion of the challenges encountered during its development and how they were addressed. In addition, an evaluation of a pair of CESM2 long preindustrial control and historical ensemble simulations is presented. These simulations were performed using the nominal 1° horizontal resolution configuration of the coupled model with both the “low-top” (40 km, with limited chemistry) and “high-top” (130 km, with comprehensive chemistry) versions of the atmospheric component. CESM2 contains many substantial science and infrastructure improvements and new capabilities since its previous major release, CESM1, resulting in improved historical simulations in comparison to CESM1 and available observations. These include major reductions in low-latitude precipitation and shortwave cloud forcing biases; better representation of the Madden-Julian Oscillation; better El Nino-Southern Oscillation-related teleconnections; and a global land carbon accumulation trend that agrees well with observationally based estimates. Most tropospheric and surface features of the low- and high-top simulations are very similar to each other, so these improvements are present in both configurations. CESM2 has an equilibrium climate sensitivity of 5.1–5.3 °C, larger than in CESM1, primarily due to a combination of relatively small changes to cloud microphysics and boundary layer parameters. In contrast, CESM2's transient climate response of 1.9–2.0 °C is comparable to that of CESM1. The model outputs from these and many other simulations are available to the research community, and they represent CESM2's contributions to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6.

884 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Juanita A. Haagsma1, Nicholas Graetz1, Ian Bolliger1, Mohsen Naghavi1, Hideki Higashi1, Erin C Mullany1, Semaw Ferede Abera2, Jerry Puthenpurakal Abraham3, Koranteng Adofo4, Ubai Alsharif5, Emmanuel A. Ameh6, Walid Ammar, Carl Abelardo T. Antonio7, Lope H Barrero8, Tolesa Bekele9, Dipan Bose10, Alexandra Brazinova, Ferrán Catalá-López, Lalit Dandona1, Rakhi Dandona11, Paul I. Dargan12, Diego De Leo13, Louisa Degenhardt14, Sarah Derrett15, Samath D Dharmaratne16, Tim Driscoll17, Leilei Duan18, Sergey Petrovich Ermakov19, Farshad Farzadfar20, Valery L. Feigin21, Richard C. Franklin22, Belinda J. Gabbe23, Richard A. Gosselin24, Nima Hafezi-Nejad20, Randah R. Hamadeh25, Martha Híjar, Guoqing Hu26, Sudha Jayaraman27, Guohong Jiang, Yousef Khader28, Ejaz Ahmad Khan29, Sanjay Krishnaswami30, Chanda Kulkarni, Fiona Lecky31, Ricky Leung32, Raimundas Lunevicius33, Ronan A Lyons34, Marek Majdan, Amanda J. Mason-Jones35, Richard Matzopoulos36, Peter A. Meaney37, Wubegzier Mekonnen38, Ted R. Miller39, Charles Mock40, Rosana E. Norman41, Ricardo Orozco, Suzanne Polinder, Farshad Pourmalek42, Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar20, Amany H. Refaat43, David Rojas-Rueda, Nobhojit Roy44, David C. Schwebel45, Amira Shaheen46, Saeid Shahraz47, Vegard Skirbekk48, Kjetil Søreide49, Sergey Soshnikov, Dan J. Stein50, Bryan L. Sykes51, Karen M. Tabb52, Awoke Misganaw Temesgen, Eric Y. Tenkorang53, Alice Theadom21, Bach Xuan Tran54, Bach Xuan Tran55, Tommi Vasankari, Monica S. Vavilala40, Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov56, Solomon Meseret Woldeyohannes57, Paul S. F. Yip58, Naohiro Yonemoto, Mustafa Z. Younis59, Chuanhua Yu60, Christopher J L Murray1, Theo Vos1 
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation1, College of Health Sciences, Bahrain2, Harvard University3, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology4, Charité5, Ahmadu Bello University6, University of the Philippines Manila7, Pontifical Xavierian University8, Madawalabu University9, World Bank10, Public Health Foundation of India11, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust12, Griffith University13, University of New South Wales14, Massey University15, University of Peradeniya16, University of Sydney17, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention18, Russian Academy of Sciences19, Tehran University of Medical Sciences20, Auckland University of Technology21, James Cook University22, Monash University23, University of California, San Francisco24, Arabian Gulf University25, Central South University26, Virginia Commonwealth University27, Jordan University of Science and Technology28, Health Services Academy29, Oregon Health & Science University30, University of Sheffield31, University at Albany, SUNY32, Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust33, Swansea University34, University of York35, South African Medical Research Council36, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia37, Addis Ababa University38, Curtin University39, University of Washington40, Queensland University of Technology41, University of British Columbia42, Suez Canal University43, Karolinska Institutet44, University of Alabama at Birmingham45, An-Najah National University46, Tufts Medical Center47, Norwegian Institute of Public Health48, Stavanger University Hospital49, University of Cape Town50, University of California, Irvine51, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign52, St. John's University53, Johns Hopkins University54, Hanoi Medical University55, National Research University – Higher School of Economics56, University of Gondar57, University of Hong Kong58, Jackson State University59, Wuhan University60
TL;DR: An overview of injury estimates from the 2013 update of GBD is provided, with detailed information on incidence, mortality, DALYs and rates of change from 1990 to 2013 for 26 causes of injury, globally, by region and by country.
Abstract: Background The Global Burden of Diseases (GBD), Injuries, and Risk Factors study used the disability-adjusted life year (DALY) to quantify the burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. This paper provides an overview of injury estimates from the 2013 update of GBD, with detailed information on incidence, mortality, DALYs and rates of change from 1990 to 2013 for 26 causes of injury, globally, by region and by country. Methods Injury mortality was estimated using the extensive GBD mortality database, corrections for ill-defined cause of death and the cause of death ensemble modelling tool. Morbidity estimation was based on inpatient and outpatient data sets, 26 cause-of-injury and 47 nature-of-injury categories, and seven follow-up studies with patient-reported long-term outcome measures. Results In 2013, 973 million (uncertainty interval (UI) 942 to 993) people sustained injuries that warranted some type of healthcare and 4.8 million (UI 4.5 to 5.1) people died from injuries. Between 1990 and 2013 the global age-standardised injury DALY rate decreased by 31% (UI 26% to 35%). The rate of decline in DALY rates was significant for 22 cause-of-injury categories, including all the major injuries. Conclusions Injuries continue to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the developed and developing world. The decline in rates for almost all injuries is so prominent that it warrants a general statement that the world is becoming a safer place to live in. However, the patterns vary widely by cause, age, sex, region and time and there are still large improvements that need to be made.

883 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: For example, this article found that soil and plant δ15N values systematically decreased with increasing mean annual precipitation (MAP) and decreasing mean annual temperature (MAT), suggesting a systematic change in the source of plant available N (organic/NH4+ versus NO3−) with climate.
Abstract: [1] We compiled new and published data on the natural abundance N isotope composition (δ15N values) of soil and plant organic matter from around the world. Across a broad range of climate and ecosystem types, we found that soil and plant δ15N values systematically decreased with increasing mean annual precipitation (MAP) and decreasing mean annual temperature (MAT). Because most undisturbed soils are near N steady state, the observations suggest that an increasing fraction of ecosystem N losses are 15N-depleted forms (NO3, N2O, etc.) with decreasing MAP and increasing MAT. Wetter and colder ecosystems appear to be more efficient in conserving and recycling mineral N. Globally, plant δ15N values are more negative than soils, but the difference (δ15Nplant-δ15Nsoil) increases with decreasing MAT (and secondarily increasing MAP), suggesting a systematic change in the source of plant-available N (organic/NH4+ versus NO3−) with climate. Nitrogen isotopes reflect time integrated measures of the controls on N storage that are critical for predictions of how these ecosystems will respond to human-mediated disturbances of the global N cycle.

883 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a hierarchical Markov model is proposed to infer a user's daily movements through an urban community using multiple levels of abstraction in order to bridge the gap between raw GPS sensor measurements and high level information such as user's destination and mode of transportation.

883 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Jens Kattge1, Gerhard Bönisch2, Sandra Díaz3, Sandra Lavorel  +751 moreInstitutions (314)
TL;DR: The extent of the trait data compiled in TRY is evaluated and emerging patterns of data coverage and representativeness are analyzed to conclude that reducing data gaps and biases in the TRY database remains a key challenge and requires a coordinated approach to data mobilization and trait measurements.
Abstract: Plant traits-the morphological, anatomical, physiological, biochemical and phenological characteristics of plants-determine how plants respond to environmental factors, affect other trophic levels, and influence ecosystem properties and their benefits and detriments to people. Plant trait data thus represent the basis for a vast area of research spanning from evolutionary biology, community and functional ecology, to biodiversity conservation, ecosystem and landscape management, restoration, biogeography and earth system modelling. Since its foundation in 2007, the TRY database of plant traits has grown continuously. It now provides unprecedented data coverage under an open access data policy and is the main plant trait database used by the research community worldwide. Increasingly, the TRY database also supports new frontiers of trait-based plant research, including the identification of data gaps and the subsequent mobilization or measurement of new data. To support this development, in this article we evaluate the extent of the trait data compiled in TRY and analyse emerging patterns of data coverage and representativeness. Best species coverage is achieved for categorical traits-almost complete coverage for 'plant growth form'. However, most traits relevant for ecology and vegetation modelling are characterized by continuous intraspecific variation and trait-environmental relationships. These traits have to be measured on individual plants in their respective environment. Despite unprecedented data coverage, we observe a humbling lack of completeness and representativeness of these continuous traits in many aspects. We, therefore, conclude that reducing data gaps and biases in the TRY database remains a key challenge and requires a coordinated approach to data mobilization and trait measurements. This can only be achieved in collaboration with other initiatives.

882 citations


Authors

Showing all 47751 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Daniel Levy212933194778
Rob Knight2011061253207
Lewis C. Cantley196748169037
Dennis W. Dickson1911243148488
Terrie E. Moffitt182594150609
Joseph Biederman1791012117440
John R. Yates1771036129029
John A. Rogers1771341127390
Avshalom Caspi170524113583
Yang Gao1682047146301
Carl W. Cotman165809105323
John H. Seinfeld165921114911
Gregg C. Fonarow1611676126516
Jerome I. Rotter1561071116296
David Cella1561258106402
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Stanford University
320.3K papers, 21.8M citations

97% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

97% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

97% related

University of California, Los Angeles
282.4K papers, 15.7M citations

97% related

University of Michigan
342.3K papers, 17.6M citations

97% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20242
2023252
20221,224
20216,519
20206,348
20195,610