scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of California, Irvine

EducationIrvine, California, United States
About: University of California, Irvine is a education organization based out in Irvine, California, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Galaxy. The organization has 47031 authors who have published 113602 publications receiving 5521832 citations. The organization is also known as: UC Irvine & UCI.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
06 Feb 2020-Cell
TL;DR: The largest exome sequencing study of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to date, using an enhanced analytical framework to integrate de novo and case-control rare variation, identifies 102 risk genes at a false discovery rate of 0.1 or less, consistent with multiple paths to an excitatory-inhibitory imbalance underlying ASD.

1,169 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
10 Apr 2010
TL;DR: How the worker population has changed over time is described, shifting from a primarily moderate-income, U.S. based workforce towards an increasingly international group with a significant population of young, well-educated Indian workers.
Abstract: Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) is a crowdsourcing system in which tasks are distributed to a population of thousands of anonymous workers for completion. This system is increasingly popular with researchers and developers. Here we extend previous studies of the demographics and usage behaviors of MTurk workers. We describe how the worker population has changed over time, shifting from a primarily moderate-income, U.S.-based workforce towards an increasingly international group with a significant population of young, well-educated Indian workers. This change in population points to how workers may treat Turking as a full-time job, which they rely on to make ends meet.

1,168 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Crizotinib is well tolerated with rapid, durable responses in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and there seems to be potential for ongoing benefit after initial disease progression in this population, but a more formal definition of ongoing benefit in this context is needed.
Abstract: Summary Background ALK fusion genes occur in a subset of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). We assessed the tolerability and activity of crizotinib in patients with NSCLC who were prospectively identified to have an ALK fusion within the first-in-man phase 1 crizotinib study. Methods In this phase 1 study, patients with ALK -positive stage III or IV NSCLC received oral crizotinib 250 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles. Endpoints included tumour responses, duration of response, time to tumour response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival at 6 and 12 months, and determination of the safety and tolerability and characterisation of the plasma pharmacokinetic profile of crizotinib after oral administration. Responses were analysed in evaluable patients and PFS and safety were analysed in all patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00585195. Findings Between Aug 27, 2008, and June 1, 2011, 149 ALK -positive patients were enrolled, 143 of whom were included in the response-evaluable population. 87 of 143 patients had an objective response (60·8%, 95% CI 52·3–68·9), including three complete responses and 84 partial responses. Median time to first documented objective response was 7·9 weeks (range 2·1–39·6) and median duration of response was 49·1 weeks (95% CI 39·3–75·4). The response rate seemed to be largely independent of age, sex, performance status, or line of treatment. Median PFS was 9·7 months (95% CI 7·7–12·8). Median overall survival data are not yet mature, but estimated overall survival at 6 and 12 months was 87·9% (95% CI 81·3–92·3) and 74·8% (66·4–81·5), respectively. 39 patients continued to receive crizotinib for more than 2 weeks after progression because of perceived ongoing clinical benefit from the drug (12 for at least 6 months from the time of their initial investigator-defined disease progression). Overall, 144 (97%) of 149 patients experienced treatment-related adverse events, which were mostly grade 1 or 2. The most common adverse events were visual effects, nausea, diarrhoea, constipation, vomiting, and peripheral oedema. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (n=9), raised alanine aminotransferase (n=6), hypophosphataemia (n=6), and lymphopenia (n=6). Interpretation Crizotinib is well tolerated with rapid, durable responses in patients with ALK -positive NSCLC. There seems to be potential for ongoing benefit after initial disease progression in this population, but a more formal definition of ongoing benefit in this context is needed. Funding Pfizer.

1,167 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Markus Ackermann, Andrea Albert1, Brandon Anderson2, W. B. Atwood3, Luca Baldini1, Guido Barbiellini4, Denis Bastieri4, Keith Bechtol5, Ronaldo Bellazzini4, Elisabetta Bissaldi4, Roger Blandford1, E. D. Bloom1, R. Bonino4, Eugenio Bottacini1, T. J. Brandt6, Johan Bregeon7, P. Bruel8, R. Buehler, G. A. Caliandro1, R. A. Cameron1, R. Caputo3, M. Caragiulo4, P. A. Caraveo9, C. Cecchi4, Eric Charles1, A. Chekhtman10, James Chiang1, G. Chiaro11, Stefano Ciprini4, R. Claus1, Johann Cohen-Tanugi7, Jan Conrad2, Alessandro Cuoco4, S. Cutini4, Filippo D'Ammando9, A. De Angelis4, F. de Palma4, R. Desiante4, Seth Digel1, L. Di Venere12, Persis S. Drell1, Alex Drlica-Wagner13, R. Essig14, C. Favuzzi4, S. J. Fegan8, Elizabeth C. Ferrara6, W. B. Focke1, A. Franckowiak1, Yasushi Fukazawa15, Stefan Funk, P. Fusco4, F. Gargano4, Dario Gasparrini4, Nicola Giglietto4, Francesco Giordano4, Marcello Giroletti9, T. Glanzman1, G. Godfrey1, G. A. Gomez-Vargas4, I. A. Grenier16, Sylvain Guiriec6, M. Gustafsson17, E. Hays6, John W. Hewitt18, D. Horan8, T. Jogler1, Gudlaugur Johannesson19, M. Kuss4, Stefan Larsson2, Luca Latronico4, Jingcheng Li20, L. Li2, M. Llena Garde2, Francesco Longo4, F. Loparco4, P. Lubrano4, D. Malyshev1, M. Mayer, M. N. Mazziotta4, Julie McEnery6, Manuel Meyer2, Peter F. Michelson1, Tsunefumi Mizuno15, A. A. Moiseev21, M. E. Monzani1, A. Morselli4, S. Murgia22, E. Nuss7, T. Ohsugi15, M. Orienti9, E. Orlando1, J. F. Ormes23, David Paneque1, J. S. Perkins6, Melissa Pesce-Rollins1, F. Piron7, G. Pivato4, T. A. Porter1, S. Rainò4, R. Rando4, M. Razzano4, A. Reimer1, Olaf Reimer1, Steven Ritz3, Miguel A. Sánchez-Conde2, André Schulz, Neelima Sehgal24, Carmelo Sgrò4, E. J. Siskind, F. Spada4, Gloria Spandre4, P. Spinelli4, Louis E. Strigari25, Hiroyasu Tajima1, Hiromitsu Takahashi15, J. B. Thayer1, L. Tibaldo1, Diego F. Torres20, Eleonora Troja6, Giacomo Vianello1, Michael David Werner, Brian L Winer26, K. S. Wood27, Matthew Wood1, Gabrijela Zaharijas4, Stephan Zimmer2 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors report on γ-ray observations of the Milky-Way satellite galaxies (dSphs) based on six years of Fermi Large Area Telescope data processed with the new Pass8 event-level analysis.
Abstract: The dwarf spheroidal satellite galaxies (dSphs) of the Milky Way are some of the most dark matter (DM) dominated objects known. We report on γ-ray observations of Milky Way dSphs based on six years of Fermi Large Area Telescope data processed with the new Pass8 event-level analysis. None of the dSphs are significantly detected in γ rays, and we present upper limits on the DM annihilation cross section from a combined analysis of 15 dSphs. These constraints are among the strongest and most robust to date and lie below the canonical thermal relic cross section for DM of mass ≲100 GeV annihilating via quark and τ-lepton channels.

1,166 citations

Posted ContentDOI
Spyridon Bakas1, Mauricio Reyes, Andras Jakab2, Stefan Bauer3  +435 moreInstitutions (111)
TL;DR: This study assesses the state-of-the-art machine learning methods used for brain tumor image analysis in mpMRI scans, during the last seven instances of the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, i.e., 2012-2018, and investigates the challenge of identifying the best ML algorithms for each of these tasks.
Abstract: Gliomas are the most common primary brain malignancies, with different degrees of aggressiveness, variable prognosis and various heterogeneous histologic sub-regions, i.e., peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic core, active and non-enhancing core. This intrinsic heterogeneity is also portrayed in their radio-phenotype, as their sub-regions are depicted by varying intensity profiles disseminated across multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans, reflecting varying biological properties. Their heterogeneous shape, extent, and location are some of the factors that make these tumors difficult to resect, and in some cases inoperable. The amount of resected tumoris a factor also considered in longitudinal scans, when evaluating the apparent tumor for potential diagnosis of progression. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that accurate segmentation of the various tumor sub-regions can offer the basis for quantitative image analysis towards prediction of patient overall survival. This study assesses thestate-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods used for brain tumor image analysis in mpMRI scans, during the last seven instances of the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, i.e., 2012-2018. Specifically, we focus on i) evaluating segmentations of the various glioma sub-regions in pre-operative mpMRI scans, ii) assessing potential tumor progression by virtue of longitudinal growth of tumor sub-regions, beyond use of the RECIST/RANO criteria, and iii) predicting the overall survival from pre-operative mpMRI scans of patients that underwent gross tota lresection. Finally, we investigate the challenge of identifying the best ML algorithms for each of these tasks, considering that apart from being diverse on each instance of the challenge, the multi-institutional mpMRI BraTS dataset has also been a continuously evolving/growing dataset.

1,165 citations


Authors

Showing all 47751 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Daniel Levy212933194778
Rob Knight2011061253207
Lewis C. Cantley196748169037
Dennis W. Dickson1911243148488
Terrie E. Moffitt182594150609
Joseph Biederman1791012117440
John R. Yates1771036129029
John A. Rogers1771341127390
Avshalom Caspi170524113583
Yang Gao1682047146301
Carl W. Cotman165809105323
John H. Seinfeld165921114911
Gregg C. Fonarow1611676126516
Jerome I. Rotter1561071116296
David Cella1561258106402
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Stanford University
320.3K papers, 21.8M citations

97% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

97% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

97% related

University of California, Los Angeles
282.4K papers, 15.7M citations

97% related

University of Michigan
342.3K papers, 17.6M citations

97% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20242
2023252
20221,224
20216,519
20206,348
20195,610