scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology.

TLDR
The 2001 Bethesda System terminology reflects important advances in biological understanding of cervical neoplasia and cervical screening technology.
Abstract
ObjectivesThe Bethesda 2001 Workshop was convened to evaluate and update the 1991 Bethesda System terminology for reporting the results of cervical cytology. A primary objective was to develop a new approach to broaden participation in the consensus process.ParticipantsForum groups composed of 6 to 10 individuals were responsible for developing recommendations for discussion at the workshop. Each forum group included at least 1 cytopathologist, cytotechnologist, clinician, and international representative to ensure a broad range of views and interests. More than 400 cytopathologists, cytotechnologists, histopathologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, public health physicians, epidemiologists, patient advocates, and attorneys participated in the workshop, which was convened by the National Cancer Institute and cosponsored by 44 professional societies. More than 20 countries were represented.EvidenceLiterature review, expert opinion, and input from an Internet bulletin board were all considered in developing recommendations. The strength of evidence of the scientific data was considered of paramount importance.Consensus ProcessBethesda 2001 was a year-long iterative review process. An Internet bulletin board was used for discussion of issues and drafts of recommendations. More than 1000 comments were posted to the bulletin board over the course of 6 months. The Bethesda Workshop, held April 30-May 2, 2001, was open to the public. Postworkshop recommendations were posted on the bulletin board for a last round of critical review prior to finalizing the terminology.ConclusionsBethesda 2001 was developed with broad participation in the consensus process. The 2001 Bethesda System terminology reflects important advances in biological understanding of cervical neoplasia and cervical screening technology.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Elevated 10-Year Risk of Cervical Precancer and Cancer in Women With Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Type 16 or 18 and the Possible Utility of Type-Specific HPV Testing in Clinical Practice

TL;DR: HPV screening that distinguishes HPV16 and HPV18 from other oncogenic HPV types may identify women at the greatest risk of > or = CIN3 and may permit less aggressive management of other women with onCogenic HPV infections.
Journal ArticleDOI

Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer.

TL;DR: HPV testing has greater sensitivity for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia than Pap testing, and Triage procedures for Pap or HPV testing resulted in fewer referrals for colposcopy than did either test alone but were less sensitive.
Journal ArticleDOI

2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors

TL;DR: The group’s goal was to provide revised evidence-based consensus guidelines for managing women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) following adoption of cervical cancer screenings guidelines incorporating longer screening intervals and co-testing.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Natural history of cervicovaginal papillomavirus infection in young women

TL;DR: An increased risk of HPV infection was significantly associated with younger age, Hispanic ethnicity, black race, an increased number of vaginal-sex partners, high frequencies of vaginal sex and alcohol consumption, anal sex, and certain characteristics of partners.
Journal ArticleDOI

Natural History of Cervicovaginal Papillomavirus Infection in Young Women Gyf Ho

TL;DR: The incidence of HPV infection in sexually active young college women is high and the short duration of most HPV infections in these women suggests that the associated cervical dysplasia should be managed conservatively.
Journal ArticleDOI

Papillomaviruses Causing Cancer: Evasion From Host-Cell Control in Early Events in Carcinogenesis

TL;DR: Modifications in host-cell genes, most likely engaged in the control of HPV gene expression in proliferating cells, emerge as important events in HPV-mediated carcinogenesis.
Journal ArticleDOI

2001 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women With Cervical Cytological Abnormalities

TL;DR: Management of women with atypical squamous cells (ASC) depends on whether the Papanicolaou test is subcategorized as of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or as cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (asc-H).
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of Three Management Strategies for Patients With Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance: Baseline Results From a Randomized Trial

TL;DR: HC 2 testing for cancer-associated HPV DNA is a viable option in the management of women with ASCUS and has greater sensitivity to detect CIN3 or above and specificity comparable to a single additional cytologic test indicating ASCUS or above.
Related Papers (5)