scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Danube University Krems

EducationKrems, Niederösterreich, Austria
About: Danube University Krems is a education organization based out in Krems, Niederösterreich, Austria. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Stroke & Population. The organization has 498 authors who have published 1572 publications receiving 68797 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Valery L. Feigin1, Rita Krishnamurthi1, R. Bhattacharjee1, Priya Parmar1, Alice Theadom1, T. Hussein1, Mitali Purohit1, Patria A. Hume1, Max Abbott1, Elaine Rush1, Nikola Kasabov1, Ineke H.M. Crezee1, Stanley Frielick1, Suzanne Barker-Collo2, P. Alan Barber2, Bruce Arroll2, Richie Poulton2, Richie Poulton3, Yogini Ratnasabathy, Martin Tobias4, Norberto L. Cabral, Sheila Cristina Ouriques Martins, Luís Edmundo Teixeira de Arruda Furtado5, Patrice Lindsay, Gustavo Saposnik6, Maurice Giroud7, Yannick Béjot7, Werner Hacke8, Man Mohan Mehndiratta, Jeyaraj D Pandian9, Sanjeev Gupta, Vasantha Padma10, Dipes Kumar Mandal, Yoshihiro Kokubo, Norlinah Mohamed Ibrahim, Ramesh Sahathevan, Hua Fu11, Wenzhi Wang12, Liping Liu12, Zeng-Guang Hou13, António Freire Gonçalves14, Manuel Correia, Yury Varakin15, Michael Kravchenko15, Michael A. Piradov15, Mohammed Saadah, Amanda G. Thrift16, Dominique A Cadilhac16, Stephen M. Davis17, Geoffrey A. Donnan17, Alan D. Lopez17, Graeme J. Hankey18, Annick Maujean19, Elizabeth Kendall19, Michael Brainin20, Foad Abd-Allah21, Natan M. Bornstein22, Valeria Caso, Juan Manuel Marquez-Romero23, Rufus Akinyemi, Nasser F. Bin Dhim24, Bo Norrving25, Shireen Sindi26, Miia Kivipelto26, Shanthi Mendis27, M. Arfan Ikram28, Albert Hofman28, Saira Saeed Mirza28, Peter M. Rothwell29, Peter Sandercock30, Raad Shakir31, Ralph L. Sacco32, Antonio Culebras32, Gregory A. Roth33, Maziar Moradi-Lakeh33, Christopher J L Murray33, K.M. Venkat Narayan34, George A. Mensah35, David O. Wiebers36, Andrew E. Moran37 
01 Jun 2015-Stroke
TL;DR: The increasing burden of stroke and other major NCDs provide strong support for the notion that the currently used primary prevention strategies for stroke andOther major N CDs (business as usual) are not sufficiently effective.
Abstract: The socioeconomic and health effect of stroke and other noncommunicable disorders (NCDs) that share many of the same risk factors with stroke, such as heart attack, dementia, and diabetes mellitus, is huge and increasing.1–4 Collectively, NCDs account for 34.5 million deaths (66% of deaths from all causes)3 and 1344 million disability-adjusted life years lost worldwide in 2010.2 The burden of NCDs is likely to burgeon given the aging of the world’s population and the epidemiological transition currently observed in many low- to middle-income countries (LMICs).5,6 In addition, there is low awareness in the population about these NCDs and their risk factors,7–10 particularly in LMICs.11 These factors, coupled with underuse of strategies for primary prevention of stroke/NCDs on an individual level and the lack of accurate data on the prevalence and effect of risk factors in different countries and populations have been implicated in the ever-increasing worldwide burden of the NCDs.12–15 Of particular concern is a significant increase in the number of young adults (aged <65 years) affected by stroke,16 and the increasing epidemic of overweight/obesity17 and diabetes mellitus worldwide.18 If these trends continue, the burden of stroke and other major NCDs will increase even faster. The increasing burden of stroke and other major NCDs provide strong support for the notion that the currently used primary prevention strategies for stroke and other major NCDs (business as usual) are not sufficiently effective. The most pertinent solution to this problem is the implementation of new, effective, widely available, and cost-effective prevention and treatment strategies to reduce the incidence and severity distribution of stroke and other major NCDs. The recent INTERSTROKE case-control study, conducted in 22 countries worldwide, provided evidence that, collectively, 10 risk factors accounted …

65 citations

25 Sep 2015
TL;DR: In this paper, a large-scale meta-regression analysis showed that a substantial increase in diabetes prevalence is expected in Japan during the next few decades, mainly as a result of the aging of the adult population.
Abstract: Aims/Introduction To provide age- and sex-specific trends, age-standardized trends, and projections of diabetes prevalence through the year 2030 in the Japanese adult population. Materials and Methods In the present meta-regression analysis, we included 161,087 adults from six studies and nine national health surveys carried out between 1988 and 2011 in Japan. We assessed the prevalence of diabetes using a recorded history of diabetes or, for the population of individuals without known diabetes, either a glycated hemoglobin level of ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or the 1999 World Health Organization criteria (i.e., a fasting plasma glucose level of ≥126 mg/dL and/or 2-h glucose level of ≥200 mg/dL in the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test). Results For both sexes, prevalence appeared to remain unchanged over the years in all age categories except for men aged 70 years or older, in whom a significant increase in prevalence with time was observed. Age-standardized diabetes prevalence estimates based on the Japanese population of the corresponding year showed marked increasing trends: diabetes prevalence was 6.1% among women (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5–6.7), 9.9% (95% CI 9.2–10.6) among men, and 7.9% (95% CI 7.5–8.4) among the total population in 2010, and was expected to rise by 2030 to 6.7% (95% CI 5.2–9.2), 13.1% (95% CI 10.9–16.7) and 9.8% (95% CI 8.5–12.0), respectively. In contrast, the age-standardized diabetes prevalence using a fixed population appeared to remain unchanged. Conclusions This large-scale meta-regression analysis shows that a substantial increase in diabetes prevalence is expected in Japan during the next few decades, mainly as a result of the aging of the adult population.

64 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Epilepsy is a common phenotypic feature of syndromic as well as non-syndromic mitochondrial disorders and treatment of epilepsy in mitochondrial disorders is not at variance fromreatment of epilepsy due to other causes but mitochondrion-toxic drugs should be avoided.
Abstract: Objectives Information about epilepsy in mitochondrial disorders is scarce although a number or syndromic and non-syndromic mitochondrial disorders frequently manifest with focal or generalized seizures. Aim of the review was to describe epilepsy in syndromic and non-syndromic mitochondrial disorders with epilepsy as a dominant or collateral feature of the phenotype. Methods Literature search via Pubmed using the key words "mitochondrial", "epilepsy", "seizures", and all acronyms of syndromic mitochondrial disorders. Results Syndromic mitochondrial disorders obligatory associated with epilepsy include Alpers-Huttenlocher-syndrome (AHS), ataxia neuropathy spectrum (ANS), Leigh-syndrome, MELAS-syndrome, myoclonic epilepsy, myopathy, and sensory ataxia (MEMSA) syndrome, and MERRF-syndrome, Occasionally, epilepsy is a phenotypic feature in IOSCA, KSS, LHON, LBSL, or NARP, All types of seizures occur but most frequently generalized tonic–clonic seizures, partial seizures, myoclonic jerks, or West-syndrome was reported. Treatment of epilepsy in patients with mitochondrial disorders is not at variance from epilepsy of other causes but mitochondrion-toxicity of various antiepileptic drugs, such as valproic acid, carbamazepine etc. has to be considered to avoid severe complications or deterioration of the underlying disease. Conclusions Epilepsy is a common phenotypic feature of syndromic as well as non-syndromic mitochondrial disorders. Treatment of epilepsy in mitochondrial disorders is not at variance from treatment of epilepsy due to other causes but mitochondrion-toxic drugs should be avoided.

64 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There is no methodologically sound evidence available justifying the routine use of ultrasonography as an adjunct screening tool in women at average risk for breast cancer, and the comparative effectiveness and safety of mammography in combination with breast ultr Masonography versus mammography for breastcancer screening for women ataverage risk of breast cancer is not assessed.
Abstract: Background Breast cancer is the most common malignant disease diagnosed in women worldwide. Screening with mammography has the ability to detect breast cancer at an early stage. The diagnostic accuracy of mammography screening largely depends on the radiographic density of the imaged breasts. In radiographically dense breasts, non-calcified breast cancers are more likely to be missed than in fatty breasts. As a consequence, some cancers are not detected by mammography screening. Supporters of adjunct ultrasonography to the screening regimen for breast cancer argue that it might be a safe and inexpensive approach to reduce the false negative rates of the screening process. Critics, however, are concerned that performing supplemental ultrasonography on women at average risk will also increase the rate of false positive findings and can lead to unnecessary biopsies and treatments. Objectives To assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening for women at average risk of breast cancer. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (via OvidSP) and EMBASE up until February 2012. To detect ongoing or unpublished studies, we searched the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), ClinicalTrials.gov and the National Cancer Institute's clinical trial database until June 2012. In addition, we conducted grey literature searches using the following sources: OpenGrey; National Institute of Health RePORTER; Health Services Research Projects in Progress (HSRPROJ); Hayes, Inc. Health Technology Assessment; The New York Academy of Medicine’s Grey Literature Index and Conference Papers Index. Selection criteria For efficacy, we considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with either individual or cluster randomisation, and prospective, controlled non-randomised studies with a low risk of bias and a sample size of at least 500 participants. In addition to studies eligible for efficacy, we considered any controlled, non-randomised study with a low risk of bias and a study size of at least 500 participants for the assessment of harms. Our population of interest were women between the ages of 40 and 75 years who were at average risk for breast cancer. Data collection and analysis Two review authors screened abstracts and full-text publications against the inclusion criteria. None of the studies met our inclusion criteria. Main results Our review did not detect any controlled studies on the use of adjunct ultrasonography for screening in women at average risk for breast cancer. One ongoing randomised controlled trial was identified (J-START, Japan). Authors' conclusions Presently, there is no methodologically sound evidence available justifying the routine use of ultrasonography as an adjunct screening tool in women at average risk for breast cancer.

62 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A systematic review was conducted to determine the comparative effectiveness of citalopram, escitaloprams, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetines, sertraline, desvenlafaxine, duloxettine, venlafAXine, bupropion, mirtazapine, nefazodone, and trazodone for accompanying anxiety, insomnia, and pain in patients with MDD.
Abstract: Background Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) often suffer from accompanying symptoms that influence the choice of pharmacotherapy with second-generation antidepressants (SGAs). We conducted a systematic review to determine the comparative effectiveness of citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, venlafaxine, bupropion, mirtazapine, nefazodone, and trazodone, for accompanying anxiety, insomnia, and pain in patients with MDD. Methods We conducted searches in multiple databases including MEDLINE®, Embase, the Cochrane Library, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and PsycINFO, from 1980 through August 2011 and reviewed reference lists of pertinent articles. We dually reviewed abstracts, full-text articles, and abstracted data. We included randomized, head-to-head trials of SGAs of at least 6 weeks’ duration. We grouped SGAs into three classes for the analysis: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and others. We graded the strength of the evidence as high, moderate, low, or very low based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group (GRADE) approach. Results We located 19 head-to-head trials in total: 11 on anxiety, six on insomnia, and four on pain. For the majority of comparisons, the strength of the evidence was moderate or low: evidence is weakened by inconsistency and imprecision. For treating anxiety, insomnia, and pain moderate evidence suggests that the SSRIs do not differ. Conclusions Evidence guiding the selection of an SGA based on accompanying symptoms of depression is limited. Very few trials were designed and adequately powered to answer questions about accompanying symptoms; analyses were generally of subgroups in larger MDD trials.

62 citations


Authors

Showing all 514 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Jaakko Tuomilehto1151285210682
Massimo Zeviani10447839743
J. Tuomilehto6919719801
Manfred Reichert6769519569
Roland W. Scholz6428915387
Michael Brainin5521544194
Gerald Gartlehner5429515320
Thomas Schrefl5040310867
Charity G. Moore5017911040
Josef Finsterer48147913836
Silvia Miksch442647790
J. Tuomilehto4410711425
Heinrich Schima432495973
Reinhard Bauer402285435
Thomas Groth381865191
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
85.6K papers, 2.6M citations

86% related

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
176.5K papers, 6.2M citations

86% related

Radboud University Nijmegen
83K papers, 3.2M citations

85% related

VU University Amsterdam
75.6K papers, 3.4M citations

85% related

University of Hong Kong
99.1K papers, 3.2M citations

85% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20237
202221
2021176
2020165
2019157
2018144