scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

French Institute of Health and Medical Research

GovernmentParis, France
About: French Institute of Health and Medical Research is a government organization based out in Paris, France. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Receptor. The organization has 109367 authors who have published 174236 publications receiving 8365503 citations.
Topics: Population, Receptor, Gene, Immune system, Antigen


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is found that embryonic precursor cells seeded the intestinal mucosa and demonstrated extensive in situ proliferation during the neonatal period, but these cells did not persist in the intestine of adult mice and were replaced around the time of weaning by the chemokine receptor CCR2–dependent influx of Ly6Chi monocytes that differentiated locally into mature, anti-inflammatory macrophages.
Abstract: The paradigm that macrophages that reside in steady-state tissues are derived from embryonic precursors has never been investigated in the intestine, which contains the largest pool of macrophages. Using fate-mapping models and monocytopenic mice, together with bone marrow chimera and parabiotic models, we found that embryonic precursor cells seeded the intestinal mucosa and demonstrated extensive in situ proliferation during the neonatal period. However, these cells did not persist in the intestine of adult mice. Instead, they were replaced around the time of weaning by the chemokine receptor CCR2-dependent influx of Ly6C(hi) monocytes that differentiated locally into mature, anti-inflammatory macrophages. This process was driven largely by the microbiota and had to be continued throughout adult life to maintain a normal intestinal macrophage pool.

812 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Six previously unknown loci associated with fasting insulin at P < 5 × 10−8 in combined discovery and follow-up analyses of 52 studies comprising up to 96,496 non-diabetic individuals are presented.
Abstract: Recent genome-wide association studies have described many loci implicated in type 2 diabetes (T2D) pathophysiology and β-cell dysfunction but have contributed little to the understanding of the genetic basis of insulin resistance. We hypothesized that genes implicated in insulin resistance pathways might be uncovered by accounting for differences in body mass index (BMI) and potential interactions between BMI and genetic variants. We applied a joint meta-analysis approach to test associations with fasting insulin and glucose on a genome-wide scale. We present six previously unknown loci associated with fasting insulin at P < 5 × 10(-8) in combined discovery and follow-up analyses of 52 studies comprising up to 96,496 non-diabetic individuals. Risk variants were associated with higher triglyceride and lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, suggesting a role for these loci in insulin resistance pathways. The discovery of these loci will aid further characterization of the role of insulin resistance in T2D pathophysiology.

811 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: This review examines the recent progress in the field of angiotensin receptors and notes that multiplicity of these receptors was demonstrated initially on the basis of pharmacologic differences and then confirmed by expression cloning.
Abstract: This review examines the recent progress in the field of angiotensin receptors. Multiplicity of these receptors was demonstrated initially on the basis of pharmacologic differences and then confirmed by expression cloning. AT1 receptors are predominant in the adult. They are widely distributed and mediate all of the known biologic effects of angiotensin II (AngII) through a variety of signal transduction systems, including activation of phospholipases C and A2, inhibition of adenylate cyclase, opening of calcium channels, and activation of tyrosine kinases. AT2 receptors are predominant in the fetus, but also present in adult tissues such as the adrenals, ovaries, uterus, and brain. AngII via these receptors exerts effects often opposed to those mediated by the AT1 receptors. Signal transduction implicates protein tyrosine phosphatase stimulation. AT1 and AT2 receptor expressions are regulated differently, and regulation is also tissue-specific. AT1 and AT2 receptors have been demonstrated in endothelial cells. Activation of AT1 receptors results in production of vasodilatory agents, nitric oxide, and prostacyclin (PGI2), which counteract the direct vasoconstrictor effects of Ang II on the adjacent smooth muscle cells. AT1 receptors on mesangial cells, smooth muscle cells, and fibroblasts are involved in cell growth and fibrosis, the latter being due both to an increase in the synthesis and a decrease in the degradation of the main components of the extracellular matrix. These AT1 receptor-dependent effects are for the most part indirect and mediated by growth factors, cytokines, and other peptides, including endothelin, transforming growth factor-beta1, and platelet-derived growth factor. AngII is metabolized into active fragments by deletion of the terminal amino acids on both ends. AngIII and AngIV are formed by successive deletions of aspartic acid and arginine at the N terminus. AngII (1-7) is obtained by deletion of phenylalanine at the C terminus. AngIII shares the same receptors and exerts the same effects as AngII. AngIV and AngII (1-7) recognize the AT1 and AT2 receptors with a lesser affinity than AngII and, in addition, possess their own receptors that mediate effects often opposed to those of AngII.

810 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Lorenzo Galluzzi1, J M Bravo-San Pedro2, Ilio Vitale, Stuart A. Aaronson3, John M. Abrams4, Dieter Adam5, Emad S. Alnemri6, Lucia Altucci7, David W. Andrews8, Margherita Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli, Eric H. Baehrecke9, Nicolas G. Bazan10, Mathieu J.M. Bertrand11, Mathieu J.M. Bertrand12, Katiuscia Bianchi13, Katiuscia Bianchi14, Mikhail V. Blagosklonny15, Klas Blomgren16, Christoph Borner17, Dale E. Bredesen18, Dale E. Bredesen19, Catherine Brenner20, Catherine Brenner21, Michelangelo Campanella22, Eleonora Candi23, Francesco Cecconi23, Francis Ka-Ming Chan9, Navdeep S. Chandel24, Emily H. Cheng25, Jerry E. Chipuk3, John A. Cidlowski26, Aaron Ciechanover27, Ted M. Dawson28, Valina L. Dawson28, V De Laurenzi29, R De Maria, Klaus-Michael Debatin30, N. Di Daniele23, Vishva M. Dixit31, Brian David Dynlacht32, Wafik S. El-Deiry33, Gian Maria Fimia34, Richard A. Flavell35, Simone Fulda36, Carmen Garrido37, Marie-Lise Gougeon38, Douglas R. Green, Hinrich Gronemeyer39, György Hajnóczky6, J M Hardwick28, Michael O. Hengartner40, Hidenori Ichijo41, Bertrand Joseph16, Philipp J. Jost42, Thomas Kaufmann43, Oliver Kepp2, Daniel J. Klionsky44, Richard A. Knight22, Richard A. Knight45, Sharad Kumar46, Sharad Kumar47, John J. Lemasters48, Beth Levine49, Beth Levine50, Andreas Linkermann5, Stuart A. Lipton, Richard A. Lockshin51, Carlos López-Otín52, Enrico Lugli, Frank Madeo53, Walter Malorni54, Jean-Christophe Marine55, Seamus J. Martin56, J-C Martinou57, Jan Paul Medema58, Pascal Meier, Sonia Melino23, Noboru Mizushima41, Ute M. Moll59, Cristina Muñoz-Pinedo, Gabriel Núñez44, Andrew Oberst60, Theocharis Panaretakis16, Josef M. Penninger, Marcus E. Peter24, Mauro Piacentini23, Paolo Pinton61, Jochen H. M. Prehn62, Hamsa Puthalakath63, Gabriel A. Rabinovich64, Kodi S. Ravichandran65, Rosario Rizzuto66, Cecília M. P. Rodrigues67, David C. Rubinsztein68, Thomas Rudel69, Yufang Shi70, Hans-Uwe Simon43, Brent R. Stockwell49, Brent R. Stockwell71, Gyorgy Szabadkai66, Gyorgy Szabadkai22, Stephen W.G. Tait72, H. L. Tang28, Nektarios Tavernarakis73, Nektarios Tavernarakis74, Yoshihide Tsujimoto, T Vanden Berghe12, T Vanden Berghe11, Peter Vandenabeele12, Peter Vandenabeele11, Andreas Villunger75, Erwin F. Wagner76, Henning Walczak22, Eileen White77, W. G. Wood78, Junying Yuan79, Zahra Zakeri80, Boris Zhivotovsky81, Boris Zhivotovsky16, Gerry Melino45, Gerry Melino23, Guido Kroemer1 
Paris Descartes University1, Institut Gustave Roussy2, Mount Sinai Hospital3, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center4, University of Kiel5, Thomas Jefferson University6, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli7, University of Toronto8, University of Massachusetts Medical School9, Louisiana State University10, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology11, Ghent University12, Queen Mary University of London13, Cancer Research UK14, Roswell Park Cancer Institute15, Karolinska Institutet16, University of Freiburg17, University of California, San Francisco18, Buck Institute for Research on Aging19, Université Paris-Saclay20, French Institute of Health and Medical Research21, University College London22, University of Rome Tor Vergata23, Northwestern University24, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center25, National Institutes of Health26, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology27, Johns Hopkins University28, University of Chieti-Pescara29, University of Ulm30, Genentech31, New York University32, Pennsylvania State University33, University of Salento34, Yale University35, Goethe University Frankfurt36, University of Burgundy37, Pasteur Institute38, University of Strasbourg39, University of Zurich40, University of Tokyo41, Technische Universität München42, University of Bern43, University of Michigan44, Medical Research Council45, University of South Australia46, University of Adelaide47, Medical University of South Carolina48, Howard Hughes Medical Institute49, University of Texas at Dallas50, St. John's University51, University of Oviedo52, University of Graz53, Istituto Superiore di Sanità54, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven55, Trinity College, Dublin56, University of Geneva57, University of Amsterdam58, Stony Brook University59, University of Washington60, University of Ferrara61, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland62, La Trobe University63, University of Buenos Aires64, University of Virginia65, University of Padua66, University of Lisbon67, University of Cambridge68, University of Würzburg69, Soochow University (Suzhou)70, Columbia University71, University of Glasgow72, University of Crete73, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas74, Innsbruck Medical University75, Carlos III Health Institute76, Rutgers University77, University of Minnesota78, Harvard University79, City University of New York80, Moscow State University81
TL;DR: The Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death formulates a set of recommendations to help scientists and researchers to discriminate between essential and accessory aspects of cell death.
Abstract: Cells exposed to extreme physicochemical or mechanical stimuli die in an uncontrollable manner, as a result of their immediate structural breakdown. Such an unavoidable variant of cellular demise is generally referred to as ‘accidental cell death’ (ACD). In most settings, however, cell death is initiated by a genetically encoded apparatus, correlating with the fact that its course can be altered by pharmacologic or genetic interventions. ‘Regulated cell death’ (RCD) can occur as part of physiologic programs or can be activated once adaptive responses to perturbations of the extracellular or intracellular microenvironment fail. The biochemical phenomena that accompany RCD may be harnessed to classify it into a few subtypes, which often (but not always) exhibit stereotyped morphologic features. Nonetheless, efficiently inhibiting the processes that are commonly thought to cause RCD, such as the activation of executioner caspases in the course of apoptosis, does not exert true cytoprotective effects in the mammalian system, but simply alters the kinetics of cellular demise as it shifts its morphologic and biochemical correlates. Conversely, bona fide cytoprotection can be achieved by inhibiting the transduction of lethal signals in the early phases of the process, when adaptive responses are still operational. Thus, the mechanisms that truly execute RCD may be less understood, less inhibitable and perhaps more homogeneous than previously thought. Here, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death formulates a set of recommendations to help scientists and researchers to discriminate between essential and accessory aspects of cell death.

809 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that there are not yet conclusive arguments for a clear neurophysiological substrate supporting a common coding between perception and action.

808 citations


Authors

Showing all 109539 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Guido Kroemer2361404246571
Pierre Chambon211884161565
Peer Bork206697245427
Ronald M. Evans199708166722
Raymond J. Dolan196919138540
Matthew Meyerson194553243726
Charles A. Dinarello1901058139668
Julie E. Buring186950132967
Tadamitsu Kishimoto1811067130860
Didier Raoult1733267153016
Giuseppe Remuzzi1721226160440
Zena Werb168473122629
Nahum Sonenberg167647104053
Philippe Froguel166820118816
Gordon J. Freeman164579105193
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
National Institutes of Health
297.8K papers, 21.3M citations

96% related

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
79.2K papers, 4.7M citations

95% related

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
75.2K papers, 4.4M citations

94% related

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
76K papers, 3.7M citations

94% related

Karolinska Institutet
121.1K papers, 6M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202368
2022306
20217,549
20207,367
20196,969
20186,607