scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Ljubljana

EducationLjubljana, Slovenia
About: University of Ljubljana is a education organization based out in Ljubljana, Slovenia. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Liquid crystal. The organization has 17210 authors who have published 47013 publications receiving 1082684 citations. The organization is also known as: Univerza v Ljubljani.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Suyong Choi1, S. L. Olsen, Kazuo Abe, I. Adachi, Hiroaki Aihara2, Y. Asano3, S. Bahinipati4, A. M. Bakich5, Y. Ban6, I. Bedny7, U. Bitenc, I. Bizjak, A. Bondar7, A. Bozek8, M. Bračko9, Jolanta Brodzicka8, T. E. Browder, M. C. Chang10, P. Chang10, A. Chen11, W. T. Chen11, Byung Gu Cheon12, R. Chistov, Y. Choi13, A. Chuvikov14, S. Cole5, J. Dalseno15, M. Danilov, M. Dash16, A. Drutskoy4, S. Eidelman7, Yuji Enari17, F. Fang, S. Fratina, N. Gabyshev7, T. J. Gershon, G. Gokhroo18, B. Golob19, T. Hara20, N. C. Hastings, K. Hayasaka17, H. Hayashii21, Masashi Hazumi, L. Hinz22, T. Hokuue17, Y. Hoshi23, S. R. Hou11, W. S. Hou10, Y. B. Hsiung10, T. Iijima17, A. Imoto21, K. Inami17, A. Ishikawa, M. Iwasaki2, Y. Iwasaki, J. Kang24, J. S. Kang25, S. U. Kataoka21, N. Katayama, H. Kawai26, T. Kawasaki27, H. R. Khan28, H. Kichimi, Hyun-Chul Kim29, S. M. Kim13, K. Kinoshita4, S. Korpar9, P. Križan19, P. Krokovny7, C. C. Kuo11, A.S. Kuzmin7, Youngil Kwon24, J. S. Lange30, S. E. Lee31, S. H. Lee31, T. Lesiak8, J. Li32, S. W. Lin10, D. Liventsev, Gobinda Majumder18, T. Matsumoto33, A. Matyja8, W. A. Mitaroff34, K. Miyabayashi21, H. Miyata27, R. Mizuk, D. Mohapatra16, G. R. Moloney15, E. Nakano35, M. Nakao, H. Nakazawa, S. Nishida, O. Nitoh36, S. Ogawa37, T. Ohshima17, T. Okabe17, S. Okuno38, W. Ostrowicz8, H. Palka8, C. W. Park13, N. Parslow5, R. Pestotnik, L. E. Piilonen16, M. Rozanska8, Hiroyuki Sagawa, Y. Sakai, Noriaki K. Sato17, T. Schietinger22, O. Schneider22, C. Schwanda34, H. Shibuya37, B. Shwartz7, A. Somov4, N. Soni39, S. Stanič3, M. Starič, T. Sumiyoshi33, S. Suzuki40, S. Y. Suzuki, Osamu Tajima, F. Takasaki, K. Tamai, N. Tamura27, Y. Teramoto35, X. C. Tian6, K. Trabelsi, S. Uehara, T. Uglov, S. Uno, G. S. Varner, Kevin Varvell5, S. Villa22, C. H. Wang41, M. Z. Wang10, M. Watanabe27, B. D. Yabsley16, A. Yamaguchi42, Y. Yamashita, M. Yamauchi, Heyoung Yang31, You-Jin Yuan, Y. Yusa42, C. Zhang, Jie Zhang, Long Zhang32, Zhenyu Zhang32, D. Žontar19, D. Zürcher22 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors presented a method to solve the problem of the EPT problem in PhysRevLett, a journal published on 2010-11-05, modified on 2017-12-10.
Abstract: Reference EPFL-ARTICLE-154584doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.182002View record in Web of Science Record created on 2010-11-05, modified on 2017-12-10

299 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that judicious selection of different parameters, staining methods along with inter-laboratory validation and harmonisation of methodologies will further help in making this assay more robust and widely acceptable for scientific as well as regulatory studies.
Abstract: The Comet Assay or single cell gel electrophoresis assay is one of the very widely used assays to microscopically detect DNA damage at the level of a single cell. The determination of damage is carried out either through visual scoring of cells (after classification into different categories on the basis of tail length and shape) or by using different commercially available or public domain software (which automatically recognise the extent of damage). In this assay, the shape, size and amount of DNA within the ‘comet’ play important roles in the determination of the level of damage. The use of a software in particular also provides a range of different parameters, many of which might not be relevant in determining the extent of DNA damage. As a large number of factors could influence the shape, size, identification and determination of induced damage, which includes the scoring criteria, staining techniques, selection of parameters (whilst using the software packages) and appearance of ‘hedgehog’ or ‘clouds’, this article aims (a) to provide an overview of evolution of measurements of DNA damage using the Comet Assay and (b) to summarise and critically analyse the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches currently being adopted whilst using this assay. It is suggested that judicious selection of different parameters, staining methods along with inter-laboratory validation and harmonisation of methodologies will further help in making this assay more robust and widely acceptable for scientific as well as regulatory studies.

298 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
C. Z. Yuan, C. P. Shen, P. Wang, S. McOnie1, I. Adachi, Hiroaki Aihara2, V. M. Aulchenko3, T. Aushev4, S. Bahinipati5, Vladislav Balagura, E. L. Barberio6, I. Bedny3, U. Bitenc, A. Bondar3, A. Bozek7, M. Bračko8, Jolanta Brodzicka, T. E. Browder, M. C. Chang9, P. Chang10, A. Chen11, K. F. Chen10, W. T. Chen11, B. G. Cheon12, R. Chistov, I. S. Cho13, Y. Choi14, J. Dalseno6, M. Danilov, M. Dash15, S. Eidelman3, S. Fratina, N. Gabyshev3, B. Golob16, H. Ha17, J. Haba, K. Hayasaka18, H. Hayashii19, Masashi Hazumi, D. Heffernan20, T. Hokuue18, Y. Hoshi21, W. S. Hou10, Y. B. Hsiung10, H. J. Hyun22, T. Iijima18, K. Ikado18, K. Inami18, A. Ishikawa2, R. Itoh, Y. Iwasaki, D. H. Kah22, H. Kaji18, J. H. Kang13, N. Katayama, H. Kawai23, T. Kawasaki24, H. Kichimi, Y. J. Kim25, K. Kinoshita5, S. Korpar8, P. Križan16, P. Krokovny, Rakesh Kumar26, C. C. Kuo11, A.S. Kuzmin3, Y. J. Kwon13, S. E. Lee27, T. Lesiak7, S. W. Lin10, Yu-xi Liu25, D. Liventsev, F. Mandl28, Daniel Robert Marlow29, A. Matyja7, Tatiana Medvedeva, W. A. Mitaroff28, K. Miyabayashi19, H. Miyake20, H. Miyata24, Y. Miyazaki18, R. Mizuk, Toru Mori18, Yasushi Nagasaka30, M. Nakao, Z. Natkaniec7, S. Nishida, O. Nitoh31, S. Ogawa32, T. Ohshima18, S. Okuno33, S. L. Olsen, H. Ozaki, P. Pakhlov, G. Pakhlova, H. Palka7, H. Park22, K. S. Park14, L. S. Peak1, L. E. Piilonen15, Y. Sakai, O. Schneider4, J. Schümann, R. Seidl34, K. Senyo18, M. E. Sevior6, M. Shapkin, H. Shibuya32, J. G. Shiu10, B. Shwartz3, Jasvinder A. Singh26, Andrey Sokolov, A. Somov5, M. Starič, T. Sumiyoshi35, F. Takasaki, M. H. Tanaka, G. N. Taylor6, Y. Teramoto36, I. Tikhomirov, S. Uehara, Yoshinobu Unno12, S. Uno, Yu. V. Usov3, G. S. Varner, Kevin Varvell1, K. Vervink4, S. Villa4, A. Vinokurova3, C. C. Wang10, C. H. Wang37, X. L. Wang, Y. Watanabe33, E. Won17, Bruce Yabsley1, A. Yamaguchi38, Y. Yamashita, C. C. Zhang, Zhenyu Zhang39, V.N. Zhilich3, Vladimir Zhulanov3, A. Zupanc 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors measured the cross section for e{sup +}e{sup -}{yields}{pi}{sup +}{pi {sup -}J/{psi} between 3.8 and 5.5 GeV/c{sup 2} using a 548 fb{sup 1} data sample collected on or near the {upsilon}(4S) resonance with the Belle detector at KEKB.
Abstract: The cross section for e{sup +}e{sup -}{yields}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup -}J/{psi} between 3.8 and 5.5 GeV/c{sup 2} is measured using a 548 fb{sup -1} data sample collected on or near the {upsilon}(4S) resonance with the Belle detector at KEKB. A peak near 4.25 GeV/c{sup 2}, corresponding to the so called Y(4260), is observed. In addition, there is another cluster of events at around 4.05 GeV/c{sup 2}. A fit using two interfering Breit-Wigner shapes describes the data better than one that uses only the Y(4260), especially for the lower-mass side of the 4.25 GeV enhancement.

297 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the rutin content of buckwheat products was compared to the RUTIN content in their raw materials, in order to evaluate their value for producing functional foods.

297 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a criterion function for a local optimization partitioning procedure for signed digraphs is proposed, which yields those partitions with the smallest number of errors, a measure of the imbalance in the graph and an identification of those links inconsistent with both generalized and structural balance.

297 citations


Authors

Showing all 17388 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
David Miller2032573204840
Hyun-Chul Kim1764076183227
James M. Tour14385991364
Carmen García139150396925
Bernt Schiele13056870032
Vladimir Cindro129115782000
Teresa Barillari12998478782
Sven Menke129112182034
Horst Oberlack12998580069
Hubert Kroha129112680746
Peter Schacht129103080092
Siegfried Bethke1291266103520
Igor Mandić128106579498
Stefan Kluth128126184534
Andrej Gorišek12895167830
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Ghent University
111K papers, 3.7M citations

91% related

National Research Council
76K papers, 2.4M citations

90% related

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
98.2K papers, 4.3M citations

90% related

Royal Institute of Technology
68.4K papers, 1.9M citations

90% related

University of Padua
114.8K papers, 3.6M citations

90% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202390
2022331
20213,150
20203,110
20192,780
20182,479