Institution
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Education•Lincoln, Nebraska, United States•
About: University of Nebraska–Lincoln is a education organization based out in Lincoln, Nebraska, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 28059 authors who have published 61544 publications receiving 2139104 citations. The organization is also known as: Nebraska & UNL.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, a review of methods to estimate yield gaps, with a focus on the local-to-global relevance of outcomes, is presented, based on which the authors recommend key components for a yield gap assessment that can be applied at local to global scales.
1,196 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, a special issue on bullying and victimization in school psychology review highlights current research efforts in American schools on bullying, peer victimization, and how this research can in
Abstract: This special issue on bullying and victimization in School Psychology Review highlights current research efforts in American schools on bullying and peer victimization, and how this research can in
1,186 citations
••
TL;DR: A theoretical overview of some critical issues relevant to conditioned place preference is provided and it seems clear that CPP measures a learning process that is fundamentally distinct from drug self-administration.
Abstract: Rationale: Among the various experimental protocols that have been used to measure drug reward in laboratory animals, conditioned place preference (CPP) has been one of the most popular. However, a number of controversial issues have surrounded the use of this experimental protocol. Objective: The present review provides a theoretical overview of some critical issues relevant to CPP. The advantages and limitations of CPP are also covered. Results: Based on modern and traditional theoretical formulations of Pavlovian conditioning, CPP appears to reflect a preference for a context due to the contiguous association between the context and a drug stimulus. Within this theoretical framework, it seems clear that CPP measures a learning process that is fundamentally distinct from drug self-administration. The main advantages of CPP are that it: (1) tests animals in a drug-free state; (2) is sensitive to both reward and aversion; (3) allows for simultaneous determination of CPP and locomotor activity; (4) is adaptable to a variety of species; (5) typically yields dose-effect curves that are monophasic rather than biphasic; and (6) has utility in probing the neural circuits involved in drug reward. The main limitations of CPP are that it: (1) is subject to interpretation based on the notion of novelty seeking; (2) is cumbersome for providing the graded dose-effect curves needed for answering some pharmacological questions; (3) is difficult to interpret when animals prefer one context prior to drug conditioning; and (4) lacks face validity as an experimental protocol of drug reward in humans. Conclusion: Despite some limitations, CPP provides unique information about the rewarding effect of contextual cues associated with a drug stimulus.
1,184 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the meaning of psychological capital (PsyCap) is defined and a micro-intervention to develop it is presented based on hope, optimism, efficacy, and resiliency development.
Abstract: After first providing the meaning of psychological capital (PsyCap), we present a micro-intervention to develop it. Drawn from hope, optimism, efficacy, and resiliency development, this PsyCap Intervention (PCI) is shown to have preliminary support for not only increasing participants' PsyCap, but also financial impact and high return on investment. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
1,161 citations
••
Research Institute for Fragrance Materials1, Columbia University Medical Center2, Malmö University3, University of Nebraska–Lincoln4, University of São Paulo5, University of Würzburg6, Oregon Health & Science University7, International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc.8, Symrise9, Vanderbilt University10, Kyoto University11, Takasago International Corporation12, University of Tennessee13, University of Arizona14
TL;DR: This publication is designed to update the RifM safety assessment process, which follows a series of decision trees, reflecting advances in approaches in risk assessment and new and classical toxicological methodologies employed by RIFM over the past ten years.
1,148 citations
Authors
Showing all 28272 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Donald P. Schneider | 242 | 1622 | 263641 |
Suvadeep Bose | 154 | 960 | 129071 |
David D'Enterria | 150 | 1592 | 116210 |
Aaron Dominguez | 147 | 1968 | 113224 |
Gregory R Snow | 147 | 1704 | 115677 |
J. S. Keller | 144 | 981 | 98249 |
Andrew Askew | 140 | 1496 | 99635 |
Mitchell Wayne | 139 | 1810 | 108776 |
Kenneth Bloom | 138 | 1958 | 110129 |
P. de Barbaro | 137 | 1657 | 102360 |
Randy Ruchti | 137 | 1832 | 107846 |
Ia Iashvili | 135 | 1676 | 99461 |
Yuichi Kubota | 133 | 1695 | 98570 |
Ilya Kravchenko | 132 | 1366 | 93639 |
Andrea Perrotta | 131 | 1380 | 85669 |