The Discovery of a Gravitationally Lensed Supernova Ia at Redshift 2.22
read more
Citations
RELICS: Reionization Lensing Cluster Survey
Strong gravitational lensing of explosive transients.
RELICS: Reionization Lensing Cluster Survey
HST/WFC3 grism observations of z ∼ 1 clusters : the cluster versus field stellar mass-size relation and evidence for size growth of quiescent galaxies from minor mergers
First Release of High-Redshift Superluminous Supernovae from the Subaru HIgh-Z SUpernova CAmpaign (SHIZUCA). I. Photometric Properties
References
The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS)
Planck 2015 results - XIII. Cosmological parameters
Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003
Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Related Papers (5)
Planck 2015 results - XIII. Cosmological parameters
The cluster lensing and supernova survey with hubble: an overview
Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Frequently Asked Questions (14)
Q2. How do the authors minimize contamination by light from the nearby galaxies?
To minimize contamination by light from the nearby galaxies, the authors use an elliptical aperture set to 1.2 times the Kron radius (Kron 1980).10
Q3. How many pixels apart were used for the spline nodes?
The spline nodes were spaced less than 1 pixel (0.′′128) apart near the core for the 1D radially varying spline, and 4 pixels apart for the 2D spline.
Q4. How do the authors calibrate the spectrum to the de-lensed HST photometry?
The authors calibrate the X-shooter spectrum to the de-lensed HST photometry in bands F125W , F140W , and F160W by integrating the de-lensed X-shooter spectrum over these filters; the authors find a multiplicative factor of 1.5 in flux is required to match the HST photometry.
Q5. How did the authors determine a robust host galaxy?
The authors determine a robust host galaxy redshift of 2.2216 ±0.0002, from a VLT X-shooter spectrum displaying multiple absorption features.
Q6. How do the authors convert the emission line to a star formation rate?
The authors then convert to a star formation rate using Ṁ = 5.45 × 10−42 L(Hα) (M /yr)/(erg/s) from Calzetti et al. (2010), resulting in Ṁ = 1.3+2.3−2.0 M /yr.
Q7. What constraint does the SED model provide on low SFR?
The velocity dispersion from the spectrum and the stellar mass from SED fitting provide joint confirmation of a high mass, while the SED fit to the spectrum and photometry provides a strong constraint on low SFR, reinforced by lack of evidence for emission lines in the spectrum.
Q8. How do the authors find the amplification at the location of the SN image?
The authors use Monte-Carlo methods to derive the predicted amplification at the location of the SN image, assuming Gaussian constraints on the centroid of the cluster and the virial mass, and find 0.61+0.20−0.16 mag.
Q9. How many extra visits were triggered after a supernova discovery?
When a promising Type Ia supernova candidate was found, at least one extra visit was triggered and executed within 2–3 observer frame weeks after the initial discovery.
Q10. What is the default parameterization for the dust attenuation curve?
The authors use the Chabrier IMF (Chabrier 2003), with a delayed-exponential star-formation history and the default ‘kc’ parameterization of the dust attenuation curve (Kriek & Conroy 2013).
Q11. How many magnitudes of uncertainty are added to the SN Ia template?
As with previous work (Rodney & Tonry 2009), the authors add 0.15 magnitudes uncertainty in quadrature with each photometry point to address this.
Q12. What is the best-fit model of the charlot & fall (2000)?
The authors assume a two-component dust model of Charlot & Fall (2000) where the dust optical depth for older stars is 0.3 times the optical depth for young (i.e., < 10 Myr) stars.
Q13. Where did the work of P.E. and D.S. take place?
The work of P.E. and D.S. was carried out at Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with NASA.
Q14. Why did the authors not request HST spectroscopy?
The authors did not request HST grism spectroscopy, as the roll angle range available would not have allowed for a clean separation of the SN and its host.