scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Brookhaven National Laboratory

FacilityUpton, New York, United States
About: Brookhaven National Laboratory is a facility organization based out in Upton, New York, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Quantum chromodynamics & Scattering. The organization has 18828 authors who have published 39450 publications receiving 1782061 citations. The organization is also known as: BNL.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A comprehensive analysis of existing data on the weak neutral current and the W and Z masses is presented, establishing the existence of radiative corrections at the 3\ensuremath{\sigma} level.
Abstract: The results of a comprehensive analysis of existing data on the weak neutral current and the W and Z masses are presented. The principal results are the following. (a) There is no evidence for any deviation from the standard model. (b) A global fit to all data yields ${\mathrm{sin}}^{2}$${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\theta}}}_{\mathrm{W}}$\ensuremath{\equiv}1-${\mathrm{M}}_{\mathrm{W}}$${\mathrm{}}^{2}$/${\mathrm{M}}_{\mathrm{Z}}$${\mathrm{}}^{2}$=0.230\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0048, where this error and all others given here include full statistical, systematic, and theoretical uncertainties (computed assuming three fermion families, ${m}_{t}$\ensuremath{\le}100 GeV, and ${M}_{H}$\ensuremath{\le}1 TeV). (c) Allowing \ensuremath{\rho}\ensuremath{\equiv}${M}_{W}$${\mathrm{}}^{2}$/(${M}_{Z}$${}^{2}$${\mathrm{cos}}^{2}$${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\theta}}}_{\mathrm{W}}$) as well as ${\mathrm{sin}}^{2}$${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\theta}}}_{\mathrm{W}}$ to vary one obtains ${\mathrm{sin}}^{2}$${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\theta}}}_{\mathrm{W}}$=0.229\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0064 and \ensuremath{\rho}=0.998\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0086. This implies 90%-confidence-level (C.L.) upper limits of 0.047 and 0.081 for the vacuum expectation values (relative to those of Higgs doublets) for Higgs triplets with weak hypercharge of 0 and \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1, respectively. (d) The parameter ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{W}$\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{\Delta}r-\ensuremath{\Delta}${s}^{2}$(1-\ensuremath{\Delta}r)/${\mathrm{sin}}^{2}$${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\theta}}}^{0}$, which is a measure of the radiative corrections relating deep-inelastic neutrino scattering, the W and Z masses, and muon decay, is determined to be 0.112\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.037. This is consistent with the value ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{W}$=0.106 expected for ${m}_{t}$=45 GeV and ${M}_{H}$=100 GeV and establishes the existence of radiative corrections at the 3\ensuremath{\sigma} level. (e) The radiative corrections are sensitive to isospin breaking associated with a large ${m}_{t}$.Assuming no deviation from the standard model, consistency of the various reactions requires ${m}_{t}$180 GeV at 90% C.L. for ${M}_{H}$\ensuremath{\le}100 GeV, with a slightly weaker limit for larger ${M}_{H}$. Similar results hold for the mass splittings between fourth-generation quarks or leptons. (f) Most of the parameters in model-independent fits to \ensuremath{ u}q, \ensuremath{ u}e, eq, and ${e}^{+}$${e}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}$ processes are now determined uniquely and precisely. (g) Limits are given on the masses and mixing angles of additional Z bosons expected in popular models. For theoretically expected coupling constants one finds that the neutral-current constraints are usually more stringent than the direct-production limits from the CERN Sp\ifmmode\bar\else\textasciimacron\fi{}pS collider, but nevertheless masses as low as 120--300 GeV are typically allowed. (h) The implications of these results for grand unification are discussed. ${\mathrm{sin}}^{2}$${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\theta}}}_{\mathrm{W}}$ is \ensuremath{\ge}2.5 standard deviations above the prediction of minimal SU(5) and similar models for all ${m}_{t}$. It is closer to the prediction of simple supersymmetric grand unified theories but is still somewhat low. (i) The dominant theoretical uncertainty (the charm-quark threshold in deep-inelastic charged-current scattering) is considered in some detail.

343 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that gold nanoparticles enhance the radiation therapy of a radioresistant mouse squamous cell carcinoma, thereby further reducing TCD50 s (tumor control dose 50%) and increasing long-term survivals.
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that gold nanoparticle (AuNP, nanogold)-enhanced radiation therapy (nanogold radiation therapy, NRT) is efficacious when treating the radiation resistant and highly aggressive mouse head and neck squamous cell carcinoma model, SCCVII, and to identify parameters influencing the efficacy of NRT. Subcutaneous (sc) SCCVII leg tumors in mice were irradiated with x-rays at the Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS) with and without prior intravenous (iv) administration of AuNPs. Variables studied included radiation dose, beam energy, temporal fractionation and hyperthermia. AuNP-mediated NRT was shown to be effective for the sc SCCVII model. AuNPs were more effective at 42 Gy than at 30 Gy (both at 68 keV median beam energy) compared to controls without gold. Similarly, at 157 keV median beam energy, 50.6 Gy NRT was more effective than 44 Gy NRT. At the same radiation dose ( approximately 42 Gy), 68 keV was more effective than 157 keV. Hyperthermia and radiation therapy (RT) were synergistic and AuNPs enhanced this synergy, thereby further reducing TCD50 s (tumor control dose 50%) and increasing long-term survivals. It is concluded that gold nanoparticles enhance the radiation therapy of a radioresistant mouse squamous cell carcinoma. The data show that radiation dose, energy and hyperthermia influence efficacy and better define the potential utility of gold nanoparticles for cancer x-ray therapy.

343 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Edoardo Aprà1, Eric J. Bylaska1, W. A. de Jong2, Niranjan Govind1, Karol Kowalski1, T. P. Straatsma3, Marat Valiev1, H. J. J. van Dam4, Yuri Alexeev5, J. Anchell6, V. Anisimov5, Fredy W. Aquino, Raymond Atta-Fynn7, Jochen Autschbach8, Nicholas P. Bauman1, Jeffrey C. Becca9, David E. Bernholdt10, K. Bhaskaran-Nair11, Stuart Bogatko12, Piotr Borowski13, Jeffery S. Boschen14, Jiří Brabec15, Adam Bruner16, Emilie Cauet17, Y. Chen18, Gennady N. Chuev19, Christopher J. Cramer20, Jeff Daily1, M. J. O. Deegan, Thom H. Dunning21, Michel Dupuis8, Kenneth G. Dyall, George I. Fann10, Sean A. Fischer22, Alexandr Fonari23, Herbert A. Früchtl24, Laura Gagliardi20, Jorge Garza25, Nitin A. Gawande1, Soumen Ghosh20, Kurt R. Glaesemann1, Andreas W. Götz26, Jeff R. Hammond6, Volkhard Helms27, Eric D. Hermes28, Kimihiko Hirao, So Hirata29, Mathias Jacquelin2, Lasse Jensen9, Benny G. Johnson, Hannes Jónsson30, Ricky A. Kendall10, Michael Klemm6, Rika Kobayashi31, V. Konkov32, Sriram Krishnamoorthy1, M. Krishnan18, Zijing Lin33, Roberto D. Lins34, Rik J. Littlefield, Andrew J. Logsdail35, Kenneth Lopata36, Wan Yong Ma37, Aleksandr V. Marenich20, J. Martin del Campo38, Daniel Mejía-Rodríguez39, Justin E. Moore6, Jonathan M. Mullin, Takahito Nakajima, Daniel R. Nascimento1, Jeffrey A. Nichols10, P. J. Nichols40, J. Nieplocha1, Alberto Otero-de-la-Roza41, Bruce J. Palmer1, Ajay Panyala1, T. Pirojsirikul42, Bo Peng1, Roberto Peverati32, Jiri Pittner15, L. Pollack, Ryan M. Richard43, P. Sadayappan44, George C. Schatz45, William A. Shelton36, Daniel W. Silverstein46, D. M. A. Smith6, Thereza A. Soares47, Duo Song1, Marcel Swart, H. L. Taylor48, G. S. Thomas1, Vinod Tipparaju49, Donald G. Truhlar20, Kiril Tsemekhman, T. Van Voorhis50, Álvaro Vázquez-Mayagoitia5, Prakash Verma, Oreste Villa51, Abhinav Vishnu1, Konstantinos D. Vogiatzis52, Dunyou Wang53, John H. Weare26, Mark J. Williamson54, Theresa L. Windus14, Krzysztof Wolinski13, A. T. Wong, Qin Wu4, Chan-Shan Yang2, Q. Yu55, Martin Zacharias56, Zhiyong Zhang57, Yan Zhao58, Robert W. Harrison59 
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory1, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory2, National Center for Computational Sciences3, Brookhaven National Laboratory4, Argonne National Laboratory5, Intel6, University of Texas at Arlington7, State University of New York System8, Pennsylvania State University9, Oak Ridge National Laboratory10, Washington University in St. Louis11, Wellesley College12, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University13, Iowa State University14, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic15, University of Tennessee at Martin16, Université libre de Bruxelles17, Facebook18, Russian Academy of Sciences19, University of Minnesota20, University of Washington21, United States Naval Research Laboratory22, Georgia Institute of Technology23, University of St Andrews24, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana25, University of California, San Diego26, Saarland University27, Sandia National Laboratories28, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign29, University of Iceland30, Australian National University31, Florida Institute of Technology32, University of Science and Technology of China33, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation34, Cardiff University35, Louisiana State University36, Chinese Academy of Sciences37, National Autonomous University of Mexico38, University of Florida39, Los Alamos National Laboratory40, University of Oviedo41, Prince of Songkla University42, Ames Laboratory43, University of Utah44, Northwestern University45, Universal Display Corporation46, Federal University of Pernambuco47, CD-adapco48, Cray49, Massachusetts Institute of Technology50, Nvidia51, University of Tennessee52, Shandong Normal University53, University of Cambridge54, Advanced Micro Devices55, Technische Universität München56, Stanford University57, Wuhan University of Technology58, Stony Brook University59
TL;DR: The NWChem computational chemistry suite is reviewed, including its history, design principles, parallel tools, current capabilities, outreach, and outlook.
Abstract: Specialized computational chemistry packages have permanently reshaped the landscape of chemical and materials science by providing tools to support and guide experimental efforts and for the prediction of atomistic and electronic properties. In this regard, electronic structure packages have played a special role by using first-principle-driven methodologies to model complex chemical and materials processes. Over the past few decades, the rapid development of computing technologies and the tremendous increase in computational power have offered a unique chance to study complex transformations using sophisticated and predictive many-body techniques that describe correlated behavior of electrons in molecular and condensed phase systems at different levels of theory. In enabling these simulations, novel parallel algorithms have been able to take advantage of computational resources to address the polynomial scaling of electronic structure methods. In this paper, we briefly review the NWChem computational chemistry suite, including its history, design principles, parallel tools, current capabilities, outreach, and outlook.

342 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is proposed that the Wip1 phosphatase is an integral component of an ATM-dependent signaling pathway and was critical for resetting ATM phosphorylation as cells repaired damaged DNA.

342 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Y. Fukuda1, T. Hayakawa1, E. Ichihara1, Kunio Inoue, K. Ishihara1, H. Ishino1, Yoshitaka Itow1, Takaaki Kajita1, J. Kameda1, S. Kasuga1, Ken-ichiro Kobayashi1, Yohei Kobayashi1, Yusuke Koshio1, K. Martens1, M. Miura1, Masayuki Nakahata1, S. Nakayama1, A. Okada1, M. Oketa1, Ko Okumura1, M. Ota1, N. Sakurai1, Masato Shiozawa1, Yasunari Suzuki1, Y. Takeuchi1, Y. Totsuka1, Shinya Yamada1, M. Earl2, Alec Habig2, J. T. Hong2, E. Kearns2, S. B. Kim3, S. B. Kim2, M. Masuzawa4, M. Masuzawa2, M. D. Messier2, Kate Scholberg2, J. L. Stone2, L. R. Sulak2, C. W. Walter2, M. Goldhaber5, T. Barszczak6, W. Gajewski6, P. G. Halverson6, J. Hsu6, W. R. Kropp6, L. R. Price6, Frederick Reines6, H. W. Sobel6, Mark R. Vagins6, K. S. Ganezer7, W. E. Keig7, R. W. Ellsworth8, S. Tasaka9, J. W. Flanagan4, A. Kibayashi, John G. Learned, S. Matsuno, V. J. Stenger, D. Takemori, T. Ishii, Junichi Kanzaki, T. Kobayashi, K. Nakamura, K. Nishikawa, Yuichi Oyama, A. Sakai, Makoto Sakuda, Osamu Sasaki, S. Echigo10, M. Kohama10, A. T. Suzuki10, Todd Haines11, Todd Haines6, E. Blaufuss12, R. Sanford12, R. Svoboda12, M. L. Chen13, Z. Conner13, Z. Conner14, J. A. Goodman13, G. W. Sullivan13, Masaki Mori1, Masaki Mori15, Florian Goebel16, J. Hill16, C. K. Jung16, C. Mauger16, C. McGrew16, E. Sharkey16, B. Viren16, C. Yanagisawa16, W. Doki17, T. Ishizuka17, T. Ishizuka18, Y. Kitaguchi17, H. Koga17, Kazumasa Miyano17, H. Okazawa17, C. Saji17, M. Takahata17, A. Kusano19, Y. Nagashima19, M. Takita19, Takashi Yamaguchi19, Minoru Yoshida19, M. Etoh20, K. Fujita20, Akira Hasegawa20, Takehisa Hasegawa20, S. Hatakeyama20, T. Iwamoto20, T. Kinebuchi20, M. Koga20, Tomoyuki Maruyama20, Hiroshi Ogawa20, Masao Saito20, A. Suzuki20, F. Tsushima20, Masatoshi Koshiba1, M. Nemoto21, Kyoshi Nishijima21, T. Futagami22, Y. Hayato22, Y. Kanaya22, K. Kaneyuki22, Y. Watanabe22, D. Kielczewska23, D. Kielczewska6, R. A. Doyle24, J. S. George24, A. L. Stachyra24, L. Wai24, J. Wilkes24, K. K. Young24 
TL;DR: In this article, the super-Kamiokande detector was used to detect atmospheric neutrino interactions with momentum p e > 100 MeV/c, p μ > 200 MeV /c, and with visible energy less than 1.33 GeV.

342 citations


Authors

Showing all 18948 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
H. S. Chen1792401178529
Nora D. Volkow165958107463
David H. Adams1551613117783
Todd Adams1541866143110
Jay Roberts1521562120516
Jongmin Lee1502257134772
Andrew White1491494113874
Th. Müller1441798125843
Alexander Milov142114393374
Alexander Belyaev1421895100796
Gunther Roland1411471100681
Mingshui Chen1411543125369
David Lynn139104490913
Kaushik De1391625102058
Xin Chen1391008113088
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
66.5K papers, 4.1M citations

94% related

Max Planck Society
406.2K papers, 19.5M citations

90% related

Stony Brook University
68.2K papers, 3M citations

88% related

Centre national de la recherche scientifique
382.4K papers, 13.6M citations

88% related

Massachusetts Institute of Technology
268K papers, 18.2M citations

88% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202335
2022188
20211,205
20201,327
20191,306
20181,198