Institution
University of New Hampshire
Education•Durham, New Hampshire, United States•
About: University of New Hampshire is a education organization based out in Durham, New Hampshire, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Solar wind. The organization has 9379 authors who have published 24025 publications receiving 1020112 citations. The organization is also known as: UNH.
Topics: Population, Solar wind, Poison control, Magnetosphere, Heliosphere
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, a high-resolution remote sensing (e.g., 1 m passive optical/NIR, or small footprint lidar) is used to map crown geometry and gaps.
Abstract: [1] Abrupt forest disturbances generating gaps >0001 km 2 impact roughly 04–07 million km 2 a 1 Fire, windstorms, logging, and shifting cultivation are dominant disturbances; minor contributors are land conversion, flooding, landslides, and avalanches All can have substantial impacts on canopy biomass and structure Quantifying disturbance location, extent, severity, and the fate of disturbed biomass will improve carbon budget estimates and lead to better initialization, parameterization, and/or testing of forest carbon cycle models Spaceborne remote sensing maps large-scale forest disturbance occurrence, location, and extent, particularly with moderate- and fine-scale resolution passive optical/near-infrared (NIR) instruments High-resolution remote sensing (eg, 1 m passive optical/NIR, or small footprint lidar) can map crown geometry and gaps, but has rarely been systematically applied to study small-scale disturbance and natural mortality gap dynamics over large regions Reducing uncertainty in disturbance and recovery impacts on global forest carbon balance requires quantification of (1) predisturbance forest biomass; (2) disturbance impact on standing biomass and its fate; and (3) rate of biomass accumulation during recovery Active remote sensing data (eg, lidar, radar) are more directly indicative of canopy biomass and many structural properties than passive instrument data; a new generation of instruments designed to generate global coverage/sampling of canopy biomass and structure can improve our ability to quantify the carbon balance of Earth’s forests Generating a high-quality quantitative assessment of disturbance impacts on canopy biomass and structure with spaceborne remote sensing requires comprehensive, well designed, and well coordinated field programs collecting high-quality ground-based data and linkages to dynamical models that can use this information
332 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the performance of a peatland carbon simulator (PCARS) model against the tower measurements of NEE and derived ecosystem respiration (ER) and photosynthesis (PSN).
Abstract: This loss was equivalent to between 30 and 70% of the net CO2 uptake during the growing season. During the first 3 years of study, the bog was an annual sink for CO2 (260 g CO2 m 2 yr 1 ). In the fourth year, with the dry summer, however, annual NEE was only 34 g CO2 m 2 yr 1 , which is not significantly different from zero. We examined the performance of a peatland carbon simulator (PCARS) model against the tower measurements of NEE and derived ecosystem respiration (ER) and photosynthesis (PSN). PCARS ER and PSN were highly correlated with tower-derived fluxes, but the model consistently overestimated both ER and PSN, with slightly poorer comparisons in the dry year. As a result of both component fluxes being overestimated, PCARS simulated the tower NEE reasonably well. Simulated decomposition and autotrophic respiration contributed about equal proportions to ER. Shrubs accounted for the greatest proportion of PSN (85%); moss PSN declined to near zero during the summer period due to surface drying. INDEX TERMS: 0315 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Biosphere/atmosphere interactions; 1615 Global Change: Biogeochemical processes (4805); 1890 Hydrology: Wetlands; KEYWORDS: peatland, bog, net ecosystem exchange, eddy covariance, carbon dioxide
332 citations
••
TL;DR: All phenological measures, including CO(2) source-sink transition dates, could be well predicted on the basis of a simple two-parameter spring warming model, indicating good potential for improving the representation of phenological transitions and their dynamic responsiveness to climate variability in land surface models.
Abstract: Summary Spring phenology is thought to exert a major influence on the carbon (C) balance of temperate and boreal ecosystems. We investigated this hypothesis using four spring onset phenological indicators in conjunction with surface–atmosphere CO2 exchange data from the conifer-dominated Howland Forest and deciduous-dominated Harvard Forest AmeriFlux sites. All phenological measures, including CO2 source–sink transition dates, could be well predicted on the basis of a simple twoparameter spring warming model, indicating good potential for improving the representation of phenological transitions and their dynamic responsiveness to climate variability in land surface models. The date at which canopy-scale photosynthetic capacity reached a threshold value of 12 lmol m � 2 s � 1 was better correlated with spring and annual flux integrals than were either deciduous or coniferous bud burst dates. For all phenological indicators, earlier spring onset consistently, but not always significantly, resulted in higher gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (RE) for both seasonal (spring months, April–June) and annual flux integrals. The increase in RE was less than that in GPP; depending on the phenological indicator used, a one-day advance in spring onset increased springtime net ecosystem productivity (NEP) by 2–4 g C m � 2 day � 1 .I n general, we could not detect significant differences between the two forest types in response to earlier spring, although the response to earlier spring was generally more pronounced for Harvard Forest than for Howland Forest, suggesting that future climate warming may favor deciduous species over coniferous species, at least in this region. The effect of earlier spring tended to be about twice as large when annual rather than springtime flux integrals were considered. This result is suggestive of both immediate and lagged effects of earlier spring onset on
331 citations
••
TL;DR: This analytical technique can be applied to other nitrogen-limited ecosystems, such as many temperate and boreal forests, to quantify the importance for terrestrial carbon and nitrogen cycling of nutrient transfers mediated by mycorrhizae at the plant-soil interface.
Abstract: When soil nitrogen is in short supply, most terrestrial plants form symbioses with fungi (mycorrhizae): hyphae take up soil nitrogen, transport it into plant roots, and receive plant sugars in return. In ecosystems, the transfers within the pathway fractionate nitrogen isotopes so that the natural abundance of 15N in fungi differs from that in their host plants by as much as 12% per hundred. Here we present a new method to quantify carbon and nitrogen fluxes in the symbiosis based on the fractionation against 15N during transfer of nitrogen from fungi to plant roots. We tested this method, which is based on the mass balance of 15N, with data from arctic Alaska where the nitrogen cycle is well studied. Mycorrhizal fungi provided 61-86% of the nitrogen in plants; plants provided 8-17% of their photosynthetic carbon to the fungi for growth and respiration. This method of analysis avoids the disturbance of the soil-microbe-root relationship caused by collecting samples, mixing the soil, or changing substrate concentrations. This analytical technique also can be applied to other nitrogen-limited ecosystems, such as many temperate and boreal forests, to quantify the importance for terrestrial carbon and nitrogen cycling of nutrient transfers mediated by mycorrhizae at the plant-soil interface.
331 citations
••
TL;DR: Denitrification-decomposition (DNDC) as mentioned in this paper is a process-based model for predicting the soil fluxes of all three terrestrial greenhouse gases: N2O, carbon dioxide (CO2), and methane (CH4).
331 citations
Authors
Showing all 9489 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Derek R. Lovley | 168 | 582 | 95315 |
Peter B. Reich | 159 | 790 | 110377 |
Jerry M. Melillo | 134 | 383 | 68894 |
Katja Klein | 129 | 1499 | 87817 |
David Finkelhor | 117 | 382 | 58094 |
Howard A. Stone | 114 | 1033 | 64855 |
James O. Hill | 113 | 532 | 69636 |
Tadayuki Takahashi | 112 | 932 | 57501 |
Howard Eichenbaum | 108 | 279 | 44172 |
John D. Aber | 107 | 204 | 48500 |
Andrew W. Strong | 99 | 563 | 42475 |
Charles T. Driscoll | 97 | 554 | 37355 |
Andrew D. Richardson | 94 | 282 | 32850 |
Colin A. Chapman | 92 | 491 | 28217 |
Nicholas W. Lukacs | 91 | 367 | 34057 |