Observation of the fastest chemical processes in the radiolysis of water.
read more
Citations
Software for the frontiers of quantum chemistry: An overview of developments in the Q-Chem 5 package
From contact electrification to triboelectric nanogenerators.
Contact Electrification at the Liquid-Solid Interface.
Electron Transfer as a Liquid Droplet Contacting a Polymer Surface.
Effects of Surface Functional Groups on Electron Transfer at Liquid-Solid Interfacial Contact Electrification
References
Molecular dynamics with electronic transitions
Rattle: A “velocity” version of the shake algorithm for molecular dynamics calculations
First lasing and operation of an ångstrom-wavelength free-electron laser
Structure and Dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E Water Models at 298 K
IMOMM: A new integrated ab initio + molecular mechanics geometry optimization scheme of equilibrium structures and transition states
Related Papers (5)
Role of water in electron-initiated processes and radical chemistry: issues and scientific advances.
Advances in molecular quantum chemistry contained in the Q-Chem 4 program package
Frequently Asked Questions (11)
Q2. How does the FWHM function of the instrument response function change?
In particular, in order to reproduce the pronounced delay in the rise of the signal at 525.93 eV, the FWHM value of the instrument response has to increase by 20% and the timezero position shifts towards positive time by 44 fs.
Q3. What is the spectral change observed at the pre-edge?
the authors posit that the spectral change observed at the pre-edge reflects the formation of the hydrated electron because of the agreement between the retrieved time constant and the ∼0.25-ps timescale for hydrated electron formation previously established by optical pumpprobe spectroscopy (7,8).
Q4. How many times are the spectra averaged?
Spectra collected at 216 time delays between 1.5 5.8 ps are averaged to produce the resonance profile, which is fit to a sum of two Lorentzians.
Q5. How many shots met the criteria for linear detector response to FEL intensity?
A total of 31,181 out of 158,680 shots met the joint criteria for linear detector response to FEL intensity, acceptable time jitter, and laser power.
Q6. How is the spectral shift for OH and H2O+ in the gas phase?
Since this shift is comparable for valence and core orbitals, the overall spectral shift is comparatively small with a maximum of about 20 meV.
Q7. How does the OH formation in the QM region differ over time?
While the radius of gyration,r2gyr =Natoms∑ k=1 mk ∣∣∣~rk − ~RCOM∣∣∣2 Natoms∑ k=1 mk , (S13)of the (H2O)+12 QM cluster varies little over the course of 200 fs, the distance of the OH to the center of mass (COM) of the remaining QM region increases upon OH formation.
Q8. What are the limitations of the ab initio treatment of an (H2O)+12?
With the computational limitations that come with the ab initio treatment of an (H2O)+12 QM cluster, molecular dynamics trajectories with the 6-31+G basis set are not feasible.
Q9. How did the authors determine the OH radical resonance?
(The authors note that by using an alternative reported position for the XES emission doublet (45) would increase the monochromator dispersion by 5%, and shift the OH radical resonance by −0.4 eV.)
Q10. How do the authors determine the dispersion of the monochromator?
The authors find that the calibrated dispersion of the monochromator does not introduce an error larger than 0.07 eV (better than 1%) and use it directly.
Q11. Why is the A signal in Fig. 2B so low?
The improved signal-to-noise ratio relative to the 2D data in Fig. 2B is due to a 10-fold increase in the number of shots per time bin.