scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Macquarie University

EducationSydney, New South Wales, Australia
About: Macquarie University is a education organization based out in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 14075 authors who have published 47673 publications receiving 1416184 citations. The organization is also known as: Macquarie uni.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper focuses and briefly discusses on cybersecurity data science, where the data is being gathered from relevant cybersecurity sources, and the analytics complement the latest data-driven patterns for providing more effective security solutions.
Abstract: In a computing context, cybersecurity is undergoing massive shifts in technology and its operations in recent days, and data science is driving the change. Extracting security incident patterns or insights from cybersecurity data and building corresponding data-driven model, is the key to make a security system automated and intelligent. To understand and analyze the actual phenomena with data, various scientific methods, machine learning techniques, processes, and systems are used, which is commonly known as data science. In this paper, we focus and briefly discuss on cybersecurity data science, where the data is being gathered from relevant cybersecurity sources, and the analytics complement the latest data-driven patterns for providing more effective security solutions. The concept of cybersecurity data science allows making the computing process more actionable and intelligent as compared to traditional ones in the domain of cybersecurity. We then discuss and summarize a number of associated research issues and future directions. Furthermore, we provide a machine learning based multi-layered framework for the purpose of cybersecurity modeling. Overall, our goal is not only to discuss cybersecurity data science and relevant methods but also to focus the applicability towards data-driven intelligent decision making for protecting the systems from cyber-attacks.

240 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A formal ontology for capturing the semantics of generic scientific observation and measurement is presented, providing a convenient basis for adding detailed semantic annotations to scientific data, which crystallize the inherent “meaning” of observational data.

240 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In contrast to bias models, which explain delusion formation in terms of extremes of normal reasoning biases, the authors advocate a deficit model of delusion formation, that is, delusions arise when the normal cognitive system which people use to generate, evaluate, and then adopt beliefs is damaged.
Abstract: After reviewing factors implicated in the generation of delusional beliefs, we conclude that whilst a perceptual aberration coupled with a particular type of attri-butional bias may be necessary to explain the specific thematic content of a bizarre delusion, neither of these factors, whether in isolation or in combination, is sufficient to explain the presence of delusional beliefs. In contrast to bias models (theories which explain delusion formation in terms of extremes of normal reasoning biases), we advocate a deficit model of delusion formation–that is, delusions arise when the normal cognitive system which people use to generate, evaluate, and then adopt beliefs is damaged. Mere bias we think inadequate to explain bizarre delusions which defy commonsense and persist despite overwhelming rational counter-argument. In particular, we propose that two deficits must be present in the normal cognitive system to explain bizarre delusions: (1) there must be some damage to sensory and/or attentional-orient-ing mechanisms which causes an aberrant perception–this explains the bizarre content of the causal hypothesis generated to explain what is happening; and (2) there must also be a failure of normal belief evaluation–this explains why a hypothesis, implausible in the light of general commonsense, is adopted as belief. This latter deficit occurs, we suggest, when an individual is incapable of suspending the natural favoured status of direct first-person evidence in order to critically evaluate hypotheses, given equal pri-ority whether based on direct or indirect sources of information. In contrast, delusions with ‘ordinary’ content may arise when a single deficit of normal belief evaluation occurs in the context of an extreme (but normal) attentional bias, thus causing failure to critically evaluate hypotheses based on misperceptions and misintrepretations of ambiguous (but ordinary) first-person experience.

240 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors developed an analytical framework for the assessment of approaches for the measurement and management of sustainability performance of supply chains (SPSCs), and examined existing approaches in the vein of improving supply chains and increasing recycling.
Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss what a fully sustainable supply chain might look like and the consequences that can be drawn from this view. Also, it develops a practical approach towards sustainability supply chain performance measurement and management. The paper develops an analytical framework for the assessment of approaches for the measurement and management of sustainability performance of supply chains (SPSCs). Little research has been conducted on the issues, existing methods and possible approaches to measure and manage SPSCs. Design/methodology/approach – Literature review and conceptual development of framework. Findings – The paper develops an analytical framework for the assessment of approaches for the measurement and management of SPSCs. Existing approaches discussed in the vein of improving supply chains and increasing recycling are examined in the light of our framework, and areas to extend the research on sustainability performance measurement and management are identi...

240 citations

Book
31 Jan 2002
TL;DR: Matthew et al. as mentioned in this paper argue that the success of a handful of multinationals from the "Periphery" in globalizing their operations extremely rapidly is an indicator that the 21st century is like to be pluralistic and diverse, offering unprecedented opportunities for firms that know how to enmesh themselves in global networks.
Abstract: The conventional view of globalization sees it as a process driven by giant firms from the Triad regions of North America, Europe, and Japan, shaping the world in their own image. This book contests such a view, describing the extraordinary success of a handful of multinationals from the "Periphery" in globalizing their operations extremely rapidly. Focusing on Acer, the Taiwanese IT company; the Hong Leong hotel group of Singapore; Ispat International in steel; Cemex of Mexico in cement; and Li and Fung from Hong Kong in contract manufacturing, Matthews demonstrates that these firms have been able to utilize strategies of international linkage and leverage to accelerate their global coverage. He contends that they are pioneers of a new kind of global firm, indicators that the global business civilization being created in the 21st century is like to be pluralistic and diverse, offering unprecedented opportunities for firms that know how to enmesh themselves in global networks.

240 citations


Authors

Showing all 14346 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Yang Yang1712644153049
Peter B. Reich159790110377
Nicholas J. Talley158157190197
John R. Hodges14981282709
Thomas J. Smith1401775113919
Andrew G. Clark140823123333
Joss Bland-Hawthorn136111477593
John F. Thompson132142095894
Xin Wang121150364930
William L. Griffin11786261494
Richard Shine115109656544
Ian T. Paulsen11235469460
Jianjun Liu112104071032
Douglas R. MacFarlane11086454236
Richard A. Bryant10976943971
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Australian National University
109.2K papers, 4.3M citations

96% related

University of Queensland
155.7K papers, 5.7M citations

96% related

University of Sydney
187.3K papers, 6.1M citations

95% related

University of Melbourne
174.8K papers, 6.3M citations

95% related

University of New South Wales
153.6K papers, 4.8M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023110
2022463
20214,106
20204,009
20193,549
20183,119