scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Saint Louis University

EducationSt Louis, Missouri, United States
About: Saint Louis University is a education organization based out in St Louis, Missouri, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Health care. The organization has 18927 authors who have published 34895 publications receiving 1267475 citations. The organization is also known as: SLU & St. Louis University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The first part of a three-part paper on North American climate in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) as discussed by the authors evaluates the historical simulations of continental and regional climatology with a focus on a core set of 17 models.
Abstract: This is the first part of a three-part paper on North American climate in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) that evaluates the historical simulations of continental and regional climatology with a focus on a core set of 17 models. The authors evaluate the models for a set of basic surface climate and hydrological variables and their extremes for the continent. This is supplemented by evaluations for selected regional climate processes relevant to North American climate, including cool season western Atlantic cyclones, the North American monsoon, the U.S. Great Plains low-level jet, and Arctic sea ice. In general, the multimodel ensemble mean represents the observed spatial patterns of basic climate and hydrological variables but with large variability across models and regions in the magnitude and sign of errors. No single model stands out as being particularly better or worse across all analyses, although some models consistently outperform the others for certain variab...

267 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a novel rivastigmine transdermal patch with conventional rivASTigmine capsules and placebo in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD).
Abstract: Objectives To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a novel rivastigmine transdermal patch with conventional rivastigmine capsules and placebo in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods In this 24-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled trial, patients with probable AD were randomized to one of four treatment groups: 12 mg/day rivastigmine capsules; 10 cm2 (9.5 mg/24 h) rivastigmine patch; 20 cm2 (17.4 mg/24 h) rivastigmine patch; or placebo. Primary efficacy measures were the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale—Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) and Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study––Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC). Results One thousand one hundred and ninety five AD patients from 21 countries participated in the study. Treatment differences (vs placebo) on the ADAS-Cog at Week 24 in 10 cm2 patch, 20 cm2 patch and capsule groups were 1.6 (p = 0.005), 2.6 (p < 0.001) and 1.6 (p = 0.003). Treatment differences on the ADCS-CGIC were 0.3 (p = 0.01), 0.2 (p = 0.054) and 0.3 (p = 0.009). Comparison between the 10 cm2 patch and the capsule revealed non-inferiority. Rates of nausea in the 10 cm2 patch and capsule groups were 7.2% and 23.1%, respectively; rates of vomiting were 6.2% and 17.0%, respectively. Moderate or severe skin irritation occurred in ≤10% patients across the four patch sizes (5, 10, 15 and 20 cm2). Conclusions The target dose of 10 cm2 rivastigmine patch provides efficacy similar to the highest doses of capsules with a superior tolerability profile. The transdermal patch with rivastigmine may offer convenience important to many caregivers and patients. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

267 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The rationale for this need for a stronger focus on evidence-based decision making in day-to-day public health practice is described, and a strategic, six-step approach to more analytic decision making is described.
Abstract: A stronger focus on evidence-based decision making in day-to-day public health practice is needed. This article describes the rationale for this need, including (1) the inter-relationships between evidence-based medicine and evidence-based public health (EBPH); (2) commonly used analytic tools and processes; (3) keys to when public health action is warranted; (4) a strategic, six-step approach to more analytic decision making; and (5) summary barriers and opportunities for widespread implementation of EBPH. The approach outlined is being tested through a series of courses for mid-level managers in the Missouri Department of Health--initial results from a pilot test are encouraging. It is hoped that the greater use of an evidence-based framework in public health will lead to more effective programs.

267 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Acyclovir is a safe treatment that reduces the duration and severity ofChickenpox in normal children when therapy is initiated during the first 24 hours of rash, and whether treatment with acyclovir can reduce the rare, serious complications of chickenpox remains uncertain.
Abstract: Background. Chickenpox, the primary infection caused by the Varicella Zoster virus, affects more than 3 million children a year in the United States. Although usually self-limited, chickenpox can cause prolonged discomfort and is associated with infrequent but serious complications. Methods. To evaluate the effectiveness of acyclovir for the treatment of chickenpox, we conducted a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 815 healthy children 2 to 12 years old who contracted chickenpox. Treatment with acyclovir was begun within the first 24 hours of rash and was administered orally in a dose of 20 mg per kilogram of body weight four times daily for five days. Results. The children treated with acyclovir had fewer varicella lesions than those given placebo (mean number, 294 vs. 347; P<0.001), and a smaller proportion of them had more than 500 lesions (21 percent, as compared with 38 percent with placebo; P<0.001). In over 95 percent of the recipients of acyclovir no new lesion...

267 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It appears that the current North American freshwater fish taxonomy at the species level significantly conceals diversity in some groups, although artificially creating diversity in others, according to a survey of named species.
Abstract: Freshwater ecosystems are being heavily exploited and degraded by human activities all over the world, including in North America, where fishes and fisheries are strongly affected. Despite centuries of taxonomic inquiry, problems inherent to species identification continue to hamper the conservation of North American freshwater fishes. Indeed, nearly 10% of species diversity is thought to remain undescribed. To provide an independent calibration of taxonomic uncertainty and to establish a more accessible molecular identification key for its application, we generated a standard reference library of mtDNA sequences (DNA barcodes) derived from expert-identified museum specimens for 752 North American freshwater fish species. This study demonstrates that 90% of known species can be delineated using barcodes. Moreover, it reveals numerous genetic discontinuities indicative of independently evolving lineages within described species, which points to the presence of morphologically cryptic diversity. From the 752 species analyzed, our survey flagged 138 named species that represent as many as 347 candidate species, which suggests a 28% increase in species diversity. In contrast, several species of parasitic and nonparasitic lampreys lack such discontinuity and may represent alternative life history strategies within single species. Therefore, it appears that the current North American freshwater fish taxonomy at the species level significantly conceals diversity in some groups, although artificially creating diversity in others. In addition to providing an easily accessible digital identification system, this study identifies 151 fish species for which taxonomic revision is required.

266 citations


Authors

Showing all 19076 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Douglas G. Altman2531001680344
John E. Morley154137797021
Roberto Romero1511516108321
Daniel S. Berman141136386136
Gregory J. Gores14168666269
Thomas J. Smith1401775113919
Richard T. Lee13181062164
George K. Aghajanian12127748203
Reza Malekzadeh118900139272
Robert N. Weinreb117112459101
Leslee J. Shaw11680861598
Thomas J. Ryan11667567462
Josep M. Llovet11639983871
Robert V. Farese11547348754
Michael Horowitz11298246952
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Pittsburgh
201K papers, 9.6M citations

95% related

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
185.3K papers, 9.9M citations

95% related

Yale University
220.6K papers, 12.8M citations

94% related

Duke University
200.3K papers, 10.7M citations

94% related

University of California, San Francisco
186.2K papers, 12M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202344
2022233
20211,619
20201,600
20191,457
20181,375