scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Saint Louis University

EducationSt Louis, Missouri, United States
About: Saint Louis University is a education organization based out in St Louis, Missouri, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Health care. The organization has 18927 authors who have published 34895 publications receiving 1267475 citations. The organization is also known as: SLU & St. Louis University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The use of the SEM to evaluate individual patient change should be explored among other health-related quality of life instruments with established standards for clinically relevant differences.
Abstract: Objective.To compare the standard error of measurement (SEM) with established standards for clinically relevant intra-individual change in an evaluation of health-related quality of life.Design.Secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial.Subjects.Six hundred and five outpatients wi

569 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The detection of elevated cardiac enzyme levels and the occurrence of electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities after revascularization procedures have been the subject of recent controversy and this report represents an effort to achieve a consensus among a group of researchers with data on this subject.

566 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Jiang et al. as mentioned in this paper compared the predictive ability of technical indicators with that of macroeconomic variables and showed that combining information from both technical indicators and macroeconomic features significantly improves the prediction of the U.S. equity risk premium.
Abstract: Academic research relies extensively on macroeconomic variables to forecast the U.S. equity risk premium, with relatively little attention paid to the technical indicators widely employed by practitioners. Our paper fills this gap by comparing the predictive ability of technical indicators with that of macroeconomic variables. Technical indicators display statistically and economically significant in-sample and out-of-sample predictive power, matching or exceeding that of macroeconomic variables. Furthermore, technical indicators and macroeconomic variables provide complementary information over the business cycle: technical indicators better detect the typical decline in the equity risk premium near business-cycle peaks, whereas macroeconomic variables more readily pick up the typical rise in the equity risk premium near cyclical troughs. Consistent with this behavior, we show that combining information from both technical indicators and macroeconomic variables significantly improves equity risk premium forecasts versus using either type of information alone. Overall, the substantial countercyclical fluctuations in the equity risk premium appear well captured by the combined information in technical indicators and macroeconomic variables. Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1838 . This paper was accepted by Wei Jiang, finance.

564 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Long‐term, high‐dose UDCA therapy is associated with improvement in serum liver tests in PSC but does not improve survival and was associated with higher rates of serious adverse events.

561 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this study, the pitfalls of tumor measurement in the nude mouse were evaluated and recommendations are made for future work employing tumor measurement.
Abstract: In this study, the pitfalls of tumor measurement in the nude mouse were evaluated. Regarding intermethod variation, diameters of subcutaneous tumors in nude mice were expressed as length, area, and volume; tumor weights were also recorded. These measurements were all compared to a reference standard: water displacement volume. Estimates of area and volume derived from caliper measurements correlated well with water displacement volume (r = 0.97 and 0.98, respectively). At necropsy, tumor weight was the most consistent and reproducible reflection of tumor volume (r = 1.0000). Regarding interobserver variation, mean absolute difference among volumes determined by several investigators who measured the same tumors in living animals was determined. This averaged 15% of the mean calculated volume. Regarding intraobserver variation, observers measured four separate masses in nude mice eight times each. The observers were prevented from realizing that the same animals were being repeatedly evaluated. Volumes were compared in order to quantify the average variation that occurs when a single investigator repeatedly measures the same mass. When large masses were measured, this error was 7%; when small masses were measured, the error was 27%. Recommendations are made for future work employing tumor measurement.

561 citations


Authors

Showing all 19076 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Douglas G. Altman2531001680344
John E. Morley154137797021
Roberto Romero1511516108321
Daniel S. Berman141136386136
Gregory J. Gores14168666269
Thomas J. Smith1401775113919
Richard T. Lee13181062164
George K. Aghajanian12127748203
Reza Malekzadeh118900139272
Robert N. Weinreb117112459101
Leslee J. Shaw11680861598
Thomas J. Ryan11667567462
Josep M. Llovet11639983871
Robert V. Farese11547348754
Michael Horowitz11298246952
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Pittsburgh
201K papers, 9.6M citations

95% related

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
185.3K papers, 9.9M citations

95% related

Yale University
220.6K papers, 12.8M citations

94% related

Duke University
200.3K papers, 10.7M citations

94% related

University of California, San Francisco
186.2K papers, 12M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202344
2022233
20211,619
20201,600
20191,457
20181,375