scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Grenoble

EducationSaint-Martin-d'Hères, France
About: University of Grenoble is a education organization based out in Saint-Martin-d'Hères, France. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 25658 authors who have published 45143 publications receiving 909760 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
24 Dec 2018
TL;DR: This paper conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings, with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance, to examine variation in effect magnitudes across samples and settings, and found that very little heterogeneity was attributable to the order in which the tasks were performed or whether the task were administered in lab versus online.
Abstract: We conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings, with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance, to examine variation in effect magnitudes across samples and settings. Each protocol was administered to approximately half of 125 samples that comprised 15,305 participants from 36 countries and territories. Using the conventional criterion of statistical significance (p < .05), we found that 15 (54%) of the replications provided evidence of a statistically significant effect in the same direction as the original finding. With a strict significance criterion (p < .0001), 14 (50%) of the replications still provided such evidence, a reflection of the extremely high-powered design. Seven (25%) of the replications yielded effect sizes larger than the original ones, and 21 (75%) yielded effect sizes smaller than the original ones. The median comparable Cohen’s ds were 0.60 for the original findings and 0.15 for the replications. The effect sizes were small (< 0.20) in 16 of the replications (57%), and 9 effects (32%) were in the direction opposite the direction of the original effect. Across settings, the Q statistic indicated significant heterogeneity in 11 (39%) of the replication effects, and most of those were among the findings with the largest overall effect sizes; only 1 effect that was near zero in the aggregate showed significant heterogeneity according to this measure. Only 1 effect had a tau value greater than .20, an indication of moderate heterogeneity. Eight others had tau values near or slightly above .10, an indication of slight heterogeneity. Moderation tests indicated that very little heterogeneity was attributable to the order in which the tasks were performed or whether the tasks were administered in lab versus online. Exploratory comparisons revealed little heterogeneity between Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) cultures and less WEIRD cultures (i.e., cultures with relatively high and low WEIRDness scores, respectively). Cumulatively, variability in the observed effect sizes was attributable more to the effect being studied than to the sample or setting in which it was studied.

495 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a detailed and comprehensive analysis of the experimental results that set the current world sensitivity limit on the magnitude of the electric dipole moment (EDM) of the neutron is presented.
Abstract: We present for the first time a detailed and comprehensive analysis of the experimental results that set the current world sensitivity limit on the magnitude of the electric dipole moment (EDM) of the neutron. We have extended and enhanced our earlier analysis to include recent developments in the understanding of the effects of gravity in depolarizing ultracold neutrons; an improved calculation of the spectrum of the neutrons; and conservative estimates of other possible systematic errors, which are also shown to be consistent with more recent measurements undertaken with the apparatus. We obtain a net result of dn=−0.21±1.82×10−26 e cm, which may be interpreted as a slightly revised upper limit on the magnitude of the EDM of 3.0×10−26 e cm (90% C.L.) or 3.6×10−26 e cm (95% C.L.).

492 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Olivier Boucher1, Jérôme Servonnat2, Anna Lea Albright3, Olivier Aumont1, Yves Balkanski2, Vladislav Bastrikov2, Slimane Bekki1, Rémy Bonnet1, Sandrine Bony3, Laurent Bopp3, Pascale Braconnot2, Patrick Brockmann2, Patricia Cadule1, Arnaud Caubel2, Frédérique Cheruy3, Francis Codron1, Anne Cozic2, David Cugnet3, Fabio D'Andrea3, Paolo Davini, Casimir de Lavergne1, Sébastien Denvil1, Julie Deshayes1, Marion Devilliers4, Agnès Ducharne1, Jean-Louis Dufresne3, Eliott Dupont1, Christian Ethé1, Laurent Fairhead3, Lola Falletti1, Simona Flavoni1, Marie Alice Foujols1, Sébastien Gardoll1, Guillaume Gastineau1, Josefine Ghattas1, Jean Yves Grandpeix3, Bertrand Guenet2, E. Guez Lionel3, Eric Guilyardi1, Matthieu Guimberteau2, Didier Hauglustaine2, Frédéric Hourdin3, Abderrahmane Idelkadi3, Sylvie Joussaume2, Masa Kageyama2, Myriam Khodri1, Gerhard Krinner5, Nicolas Lebas1, Guillaume Levavasseur1, Claire Lévy1, Laurent Li3, François Lott3, Thibaut Lurton1, Sebastiaan Luyssaert6, Gurvan Madec1, Jean Baptiste Madeleine3, Fabienne Maignan2, Marion Marchand1, Olivier Marti2, Lidia Mellul3, Yann Meurdesoif2, Juliette Mignot1, Ionela Musat3, Catherine Ottlé2, Philippe Peylin2, Yann Planton1, Jan Polcher3, Catherine Rio2, Nicolas Rochetin3, Clément Rousset1, Pierre Sepulchre2, Adriana Sima3, Didier Swingedouw4, Rémi Thiéblemont, Abdoul Khadre Traore3, Martin Vancoppenolle1, Jessica Vial3, Jérôme Vialard1, Nicolas Viovy2, Nicolas Vuichard2 
TL;DR: The authors presented the global climate model IPSL-CM6A-LR developed at the Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL) to study natural climate variability and climate response to natural and anthropogenic forcings as part of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6).
Abstract: This study presents the global climate model IPSL-CM6A-LR developed at Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL) to study natural climate variability and climate response to natural and anthropogenic forcings as part of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). This article describes the different model components, their coupling, and the simulated climate in comparison to previous model versions. We focus here on the representation of the physical climate along with the main characteristics of the global carbon cycle. The model's climatology, as assessed from a range of metrics (related in particular to radiation, temperature, precipitation, and wind), is strongly improved in comparison to previous model versions. Although they are reduced, a number of known biases and shortcomings (e.g., double Intertropical Convergence Zone [ITCZ], frequency of midlatitude wintertime blockings, and El Nino–Southern Oscillation [ENSO] dynamics) persist. The equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response have both increased from the previous climate model IPSL-CM5A-LR used in CMIP5. A large ensemble of more than 30 members for the historical period (1850–2018) and a smaller ensemble for a range of emissions scenarios (until 2100 and 2300) are also presented and discussed.

492 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The level of replication required for accurate detection of targeted taxa in different contexts was evaluated and whether statistical approaches developed to estimate occupancy in the presence of observational errors can successfully estimate true prevalence, detection probability and false‐positive rates was evaluated.
Abstract: Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is increasingly used to study the present and past biodiversity. eDNA analyses often rely on amplification of very small quantities or degraded DNA. To avoid missing detection of taxa that are actually present (false negatives), multiple extractions and amplifications of the same samples are often performed. However, the level of replication needed for reliable estimates of the presence/absence patterns remains an unaddressed topic. Furthermore, degraded DNA and PCR/sequencing errors might produce false positives. We used simulations and empirical data to evaluate the level of replication required for accurate detection of targeted taxa in different contexts and to assess the performance of methods used to reduce the risk of false detections. Furthermore, we evaluated whether statistical approaches developed to estimate occupancy in the presence of observational errors can successfully estimate true prevalence, detection probability and false-positive rates. Replications reduced the rate of false negatives; the optimal level of replication was strongly dependent on the detection probability of taxa. Occupancy models successfully estimated true prevalence, detection probability and false-positive rates, but their performance increased with the number of replicates. At least eight PCR replicates should be performed if detection probability is not high, such as in ancient DNA studies. Multiple DNA extractions from the same sample yielded consistent results; in some cases, collecting multiple samples from the same locality allowed detecting more species. The optimal level of replication for accurate species detection strongly varies among studies and could be explicitly estimated to improve the reliability of results.

490 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: JASPAR (http://jaspar.genereg.net/) is an open-access database containing manually curated, non-redundant transcription factor (TF) binding profiles for TFs across six taxonomic groups as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: JASPAR (http://jaspar.genereg.net/) is an open-access database containing manually curated, non-redundant transcription factor (TF) binding profiles for TFs across six taxonomic groups. In this 9th release, we expanded the CORE collection with 341 new profiles (148 for plants, 101 for vertebrates, 85 for urochordates, and 7 for insects), which corresponds to a 19% expansion over the previous release. We added 298 new profiles to the Unvalidated collection when no orthogonal evidence was found in the literature. All the profiles were clustered to provide familial binding profiles for each taxonomic group. Moreover, we revised the structural classification of DNA binding domains to consider plant-specific TFs. This release introduces word clouds to represent the scientific knowledge associated with each TF. We updated the genome tracks of TFBSs predicted with JASPAR profiles in eight organisms; the human and mouse TFBS predictions can be visualized as native tracks in the UCSC Genome Browser. Finally, we provide a new tool to perform JASPAR TFBS enrichment analysis in user-provided genomic regions. All the data is accessible through the JASPAR website, its associated RESTful API, the R/Bioconductor data package, and a new Python package, pyJASPAR, that facilitates serverless access to the data.

490 citations


Authors

Showing all 25961 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Dieter Lutz13967167414
Marcella Bona137139192162
Nicolas Berger137158196529
Cordelia Schmid135464103925
J. F. Macías-Pérez13448694715
Marina Cobal132107885437
Lydia Roos132128489435
Tetiana Hryn'ova131105984260
Johann Collot131101882865
Remi Lafaye131101283281
Jan Stark131118687025
Sabine Crépé-Renaudin129114282741
Isabelle Wingerter-Seez12993079689
James Alexander12988675096
Jessica Levêque129100670208
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Paris
174.1K papers, 5M citations

96% related

Centre national de la recherche scientifique
382.4K papers, 13.6M citations

93% related

ETH Zurich
122.4K papers, 5.1M citations

92% related

Imperial College London
209.1K papers, 9.3M citations

91% related

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
98.2K papers, 4.3M citations

91% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023166
2022698
20215,127
20205,328
20195,192
20184,999