scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Warsaw

EducationWarsaw, Poland
About: University of Warsaw is a education organization based out in Warsaw, Poland. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Large Hadron Collider. The organization has 20832 authors who have published 56617 publications receiving 1185084 citations. The organization is also known as: Uniwersytet Warszawski & Warsaw University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The data suggest that three different ribonucleases can serve as catalytic subunits for the exosome in human cells, and this work demonstrates the association of two different Dis3p homologs—hDIS3 and hDIS3L—with the humanExosome core.
Abstract: The eukaryotic RNA exosome is a ribonucleolytic complex involved in RNA processing and turnover. It consists of a nine-subunit catalytically inert core that serves a structural function and participates in substrate recognition. Best defined in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, enzymatic activity comes from the associated subunits Dis3p (Rrp44p) and Rrp6p. The former is a nuclear and cytoplasmic RNase II/R-like enzyme, which possesses both processive exo- and endonuclease activities, whereas the latter is a distributive RNase D-like nuclear exonuclease. Although the exosome core is highly conserved, identity and arrangements of its catalytic subunits in different vertebrates remain elusive. Here, we demonstrate the association of two different Dis3p homologs—hDIS3 and hDIS3L—with the human exosome core. Interestingly, these factors display markedly different intracellular localizations: hDIS3 is mainly nuclear, whereas hDIS3L is strictly cytoplasmic. This compartmental distribution reflects the substrate preferences of the complex in vivo. Both hDIS3 and hDIS3L are active exonucleases; however, only hDIS3 has retained endonucleolytic activity. Our data suggest that three different ribonucleases can serve as catalytic subunits for the exosome in human cells.

250 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Albert M. Sirunyan1, Armen Tumasyan1, Wolfgang Adam, Federico Ambrogi  +2240 moreInstitutions (157)
TL;DR: In this article, a measurement of the H→ττ signal strength is performed using events recorded in proton-proton collisions by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2016 at a center-of-mass energy of 13TeV.

250 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
V. Fanti, A. Lai, D. Marras, Luciano Musa  +149 moreInstitutions (9)
TL;DR: The NA48 experiment at CERN has performed a new measurement of direct CP violation, based on data taken in 1997 by simultaneously collecting KL and KS decays into π0π0 and π+π− as discussed by the authors.

249 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Juan Antonio Aguilar-Saavedra1, Ahmed Ali, Benjamin C. Allanach2, Richard L. Arnowitt3, Howard Baer4, Jonathan Bagger5, Csaba Balázs6, Vernon Barger7, Michael Barnett8, A. Bartl9, Marco Battaglia8, Philip Bechtle10, Geneviève Bélanger, Alexander Belyaev11, Edmond L. Berger6, G.A. Blair12, Edouard Boos13, Marcela Carena14, S.Y. Choi15, Frank F. Deppisch, A. De Roeck16, Klaus Desch17, Marco Aurelio Diaz18, Abdelhak Djouadi19, Bhaskar Dutta3, S. Dutta10, S. Dutta20, Helmut Eberl21, John Ellis16, Jens Erler22, H. Fraas23, Ayres Freitas24, T. Fritzsche25, Rohini M. Godbole26, G. Gounaris27, Jaume Guasch28, John F. Gunion29, Naoyuki Haba30, Howard E. Haber31, K. Hagiwara, Liyuan Han32, Tao Han7, Hong-Jian He33, Sven Heinemeyer16, S. Hesselbach34, Keisho Hidaka35, I. Hinchliffe8, Martin Hirsch36, K. Hohenwarter-Sodek9, Wolfgang Hollik25, W. S. Hou37, Tobias Hurth10, Tobias Hurth16, I. Jack38, Yi Jiang32, D.R.T. Jones38, J. Kalinowski39, T. Kamon3, Gordon L. Kane40, Sin Kyu Kang41, Thomas Kernreiter9, Wolfgang Kilian, Choong Sun Kim42, Stephen F. King43, O. Kittel44, Michael Klasen, J. L. Kneur45, K. Kovarik21, Michael Kramer46, Sabine Kraml16, Remi Lafaye47, Paul Langacker48, Heather E. Logan49, W. G. Ma32, W. Majerotto21, H. U. Martyn46, Konstantin Matchev50, David J. Miller51, Myriam Mondragón22, Gudrid Moortgat-Pick16, Stefano Moretti43, Takehiko Mori52, Gilbert Moultaka45, Steve Muanza53, M. M. Mühlleitner, Biswarup Mukhopadhyaya54, U. Nauenberg55, Mihoko M. Nojiri56, D. Nomura11, H. Nowak, N. Okada, Keith A. Olive57, W. Oller21, Michael E. Peskin10, Tilman Plehn25, Giacomo Polesello, Werner Porod24, Werner Porod36, Fernando Quevedo2, David L. Rainwater58, Jürgen Reuter, Peter J. Richardson59, Krzysztof Rolbiecki39, Probir Roy60, Reinhold Rückl23, Heidi Rzehak61, P. Schleper62, Kim Siyeon63, Peter Skands14, P. Slavich, Dominik Stöckinger59, Paraskevas Sphicas16, Michael Spira61, Tim M. P. Tait6, Daniel Tovey64, José W. F. Valle36, Carlos E. M. Wagner6, Carlos E. M. Wagner65, Ch. Weber21, Georg Weiglein59, Peter Wienemann17, Z.-Z. Xing, Y. Yamada66, Jin Min Yang, D. Zerwas19, P.M. Zerwas, Ren-You Zhang32, X. Zhang, S.-H. Zhu67 
University of Lisbon1, University of Cambridge2, Texas A&M University3, Florida State University4, Johns Hopkins University5, Argonne National Laboratory6, University of Wisconsin-Madison7, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory8, University of Vienna9, Stanford University10, Michigan State University11, Royal Holloway, University of London12, Moscow State University13, Fermilab14, Chonbuk National University15, CERN16, University of Freiburg17, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile18, University of Paris19, University of Delhi20, Austrian Academy of Sciences21, National Autonomous University of Mexico22, University of Würzburg23, University of Zurich24, Max Planck Society25, Indian Institute of Science26, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki27, University of Barcelona28, University of California, Davis29, University of Tokushima30, University of California, Santa Cruz31, University of Science and Technology of China32, Tsinghua University33, Uppsala University34, Tokyo Gakugei University35, Spanish National Research Council36, National Taiwan University37, University of Liverpool38, University of Warsaw39, University of Michigan40, Seoul National University41, Yonsei University42, University of Southampton43, University of Bonn44, University of Montpellier45, RWTH Aachen University46, Laboratoire d'Annecy-le-Vieux de physique des particules47, University of Pennsylvania48, Carleton University49, University of Florida50, University of Glasgow51, University of Tokyo52, University of Lyon53, Harish-Chandra Research Institute54, University of Colorado Boulder55, Kyoto University56, University of Minnesota57, University of Rochester58, Durham University59, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research60, Paul Scherrer Institute61, University of Hamburg62, Chung-Ang University63, University of Sheffield64, University of Chicago65, Tohoku University66, Peking University67
TL;DR: In this article, a supersymmetry Parameter Analysis SPA (SPA) scheme is proposed based on a consistent set of conventions and input parameters, which connect parameters in different schemes and relate the Lagrangian parameters to physical observables at LHC and high energy e+e-linear collider experiments.
Abstract: High-precision analyses of supersymmetry parameters aim at reconstructing the fundamental supersymmetric theory and its breaking mechanism. A well defined theoretical framework is needed when higher-order corrections are included. We propose such a scheme, Supersymmetry Parameter Analysis SPA, based on a consistent set of conventions and input parameters. A repository for computer programs is provided which connect parameters in different schemes and relate the Lagrangian parameters to physical observables at LHC and high energy e+e- linear collider experiments, i.e., masses, mixings, decay widths and production cross sections for supersymmetric particles. In addition, programs for calculating high-precision low energy observables, the density of cold dark matter (CDM) in the universe as well as the cross sections for CDM search experiments are included. The SPA scheme still requires extended efforts on both the theoretical and experimental side before data can be evaluated in the future at the level of the desired precision. We take here an initial step of testing the SPA scheme by applying the techniques involved to a specific supersymmetry reference point.

249 citations


Authors

Showing all 21191 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Alexander Malakhov139148699556
Emmanuelle Perez138155099016
Piotr Zalewski135138889976
Krzysztof Doroba133144089029
Hector F. DeLuca133130369395
Krzysztof M. Gorski132380105912
Igor Golutvin131128288559
Jan Krolikowski131128983994
Michal Szleper130123882036
Anatoli Zarubin129120486435
Malgorzata Kazana129117581106
Artur Kalinowski129116281906
Predrag Milenovic129118581144
Marcin Konecki128117879392
Karol Bunkowski128119279455
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Centre national de la recherche scientifique
382.4K papers, 13.6M citations

90% related

University of Paris-Sud
52.7K papers, 2.1M citations

90% related

ETH Zurich
122.4K papers, 5.1M citations

90% related

École Normale Supérieure
99.4K papers, 3M citations

89% related

Max Planck Society
406.2K papers, 19.5M citations

89% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023176
2022619
20212,882
20203,208
20193,130
20183,164