scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

NonprofitCambridge, United Kingdom
About: Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is a nonprofit organization based out in Cambridge, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Genome. The organization has 4009 authors who have published 9671 publications receiving 1224479 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
30 Apr 2010-Science
TL;DR: The approaches described here are generally applicable to high-throughput follow-up analyses of phenotypic screens in mammalian cells and led to the discovery of previously unknown, evolutionarily conserved subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex and the γ-tubulin ring complex—large complexes that are essential for spindle assembly and chromosome segregation.
Abstract: Chromosome segregation and cell division are essential, highly ordered processes that depend on numerous protein complexes. Results from recent RNA interference (RNAi) screens indicate that the identity and composition of these protein complexes is incompletely understood. Using gene tagging on bacterial artificial chromosomes, protein localization and tandem affinity purification-mass spectrometry, the MitoCheck consortium has analyzed about 100 human protein complexes, many of which had not or only incompletely been characterized. This work has led to the discovery of previously unknown, evolutionarily conserved subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C) and the γ-tubulin ring complex (γ-TuRC), large complexes which are essential for spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. The approaches we describe here are generally applicable to high throughput follow-up analyses of phenotypic screens in mammalian cells.

480 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Shahana Ahmed1, Gilles Thomas2, Maya Ghoussaini1, Catherine S. Healey1, Manjeet K. Humphreys1, Radka Platte1, Jonathan J. Morrison1, Melanie Maranian1, Karen A. Pooley1, Robert Luben1, Diana Eccles3, D. Gareth Evans4, Olivia Fletcher, Nichola Johnson, Isabel dos Santos Silva, Julian Peto, Michael R. Stratton5, Nazneen Rahman, Kevin B. Jacobs2, Kevin B. Jacobs6, Ross L. Prentice7, Garnet L. Anderson7, Aleksandar Rajkovic8, J. David Curb9, Regina G. Ziegler2, Christine D. Berg2, Saundra S. Buys10, Catherine A. McCarty11, Heather Spencer Feigelson12, Eugenia E. Calle12, Michael J. Thun12, W. Ryan Diver12, Stig E. Bojesen13, Børge G. Nordestgaard13, Henrik Flyger13, Thilo Dörk14, Peter Schürmann14, Peter Hillemanns14, Johann H. Karstens14, Natalia Bogdanova14, Natalia Antonenkova, Iosif V. Zalutsky, Marina Bermisheva14, S. A. Fedorova15, Elza Khusnutdinova, Daehee Kang16, Keun-Young Yoo16, Dong Young Noh16, Sei Hyun Ahn16, Peter Devilee17, Christi J. van Asperen17, R.A.E.M. Tollenaar17, Caroline Seynaeve18, Montserrat Garcia-Closas2, Jolanta Lissowska19, Louise A. Brinton2, Beata Peplonska20, Heli Nevanlinna21, Tuomas Heikkinen21, Kristiina Aittomäki21, Carl Blomqvist21, John L. Hopper22, Melissa C. Southey22, Letitia D. Smith23, Amanda B. Spurdle23, Marjanka K. Schmidt24, Annegien Broeks24, Richard van Hien24, Sten Cornelissen24, Roger L. Milne25, Gloria Ribas25, Anna González-Neira25, Javier Benitez25, Rita K. Schmutzler26, Barbara Burwinkel27, Barbara Burwinkel28, Claus R. Bartram27, Alfons Meindl29, Hiltrud Brauch30, Hiltrud Brauch31, Christina Justenhoven31, Christina Justenhoven30, Ute Hamann28, Jenny Chang-Claude28, Rebecca Hein28, Shan Wang-Gohrke32, Annika Lindblom33, Sara Margolin33, Arto Mannermaa34, Veli-Matti Kosma34, Vesa Kataja34, Janet E. Olson35, Xianshu Wang35, Zachary S. Fredericksen35, Graham G. Giles36, Graham G. Giles22, Gianluca Severi36, Gianluca Severi22, Laura Baglietto36, Laura Baglietto22, Dallas R. English22, Dallas R. English25, Susan E. Hankinson37, David G. Cox37, Peter Kraft37, Lars J. Vatten38, Kristian Hveem38, Merethe Kumle, Alice J. Sigurdson2, Michele M. Doody2, Parveen Bhatti2, Bruce H. Alexander39, Maartje J. Hooning18, Ans M.W. van den Ouweland18, Rogier A. Oldenburg18, Mieke Schutte18, Per Hall33, Kamila Czene33, Jianjun Liu40, Yuqing Li40, Angela Cox41, Graeme Elliott41, Ian W. Brock41, Malcolm W.R. Reed41, Chen-Yang Shen42, Chen-Yang Shen43, Jyh Cherng Yu44, Giu Cheng Hsu44, Shou Tung Chen, Hoda Anton-Culver45, Argyrios Ziogas45, Irene L. Andrulis46, Julia A. Knight46, Jonathan Beesley23, Ellen L. Goode35, Fergus J. Couch35, Georgia Chenevix-Trench23, Robert N. Hoover2, Bruce A.J. Ponder1, Bruce A.J. Ponder47, David J. Hunter37, Paul D.P. Pharoah1, Alison M. Dunning1, Stephen J. Chanock2, Douglas F. Easton1 
TL;DR: Strong evidence is found for additional susceptibility loci on 3p and 17q and potential causative genes include SLC4A7 and NEK10 on3p and COX11 on 17q.
Abstract: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified seven breast cancer susceptibility loci, but these explain only a small fraction of the familial risk of the disease. Five of these loci were identified through a two-stage GWAS involving 390 familial cases and 364 controls in the first stage, and 3,990 cases and 3,916 controls in the second stage. To identify additional loci, we tested over 800 promising associations from this GWAS in a further two stages involving 37,012 cases and 40,069 controls from 33 studies in the CGEMS collaboration and Breast Cancer Association Consortium. We found strong evidence for additional susceptibility loci on 3p (rs4973768: per-allele OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.08-1.13, P = 4.1 x 10(-23)) and 17q (rs6504950: per-allele OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.92-0.97, P = 1.4 x 10(-8)). Potential causative genes include SLC4A7 and NEK10 on 3p and COX11 on 17q.

480 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work proposes a Bayesian method to call indels from short-read sequence data in individuals and populations by realigning reads to candidate haplotypes that represent alternative sequence to the reference, and achieves low false discovery rates on simulated and real data sets.
Abstract: Small insertions and deletions (indels) are a common and functionally important type of sequence polymorphism. Most of the focus of studies of sequence variation is on single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and large structural variants. In principle, high-throughput sequencing studies should allow identification of indels just as SNVs. However, inference of indels from next-generation sequence data is challenging, and so far methods for identifying indels lag behind methods for calling SNVs in terms of sensitivity and specificity. We propose a Bayesian method to call indels from short-read sequence data in individuals and populations by realigning reads to candidate haplotypes that represent alternative sequence to the reference. The candidate haplotypes are formed by combining candidate indels and SNVs identified by the read mapper, while allowing for known sequence variants or candidates from other methods to be included. In our probabilistic realignment model we account for base-calling errors, mapping errors, and also, importantly, for increased sequencing error indel rates in long homopolymer runs. We show that our method is sensitive and achieves low false discovery rates on simulated and real data sets, although challenges remain. The algorithm is implemented in the program Dindel, which has been used in the 1000 Genomes Project call sets.

480 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
05 Feb 2020-Nature
TL;DR: Whole-genome sequencing data from more than 2,500 cancers of 38 tumour types reveal 16 signatures that can be used to classify somatic structural variants, highlighting the diversity of genomic rearrangements in cancer.
Abstract: A key mutational process in cancer is structural variation, in which rearrangements delete, amplify or reorder genomic segments that range in size from kilobases to whole chromosomes1-7. Here we develop methods to group, classify and describe somatic structural variants, using data from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), which aggregated whole-genome sequencing data from 2,658 cancers across 38 tumour types8. Sixteen signatures of structural variation emerged. Deletions have a multimodal size distribution, assort unevenly across tumour types and patients, are enriched in late-replicating regions and correlate with inversions. Tandem duplications also have a multimodal size distribution, but are enriched in early-replicating regions-as are unbalanced translocations. Replication-based mechanisms of rearrangement generate varied chromosomal structures with low-level copy-number gains and frequent inverted rearrangements. One prominent structure consists of 2-7 templates copied from distinct regions of the genome strung together within one locus. Such cycles of templated insertions correlate with tandem duplications, and-in liver cancer-frequently activate the telomerase gene TERT. A wide variety of rearrangement processes are active in cancer, which generate complex configurations of the genome upon which selection can act.

479 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Comparison with the meiotic program of the distantly related Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals an unexpectedly small shared meiotic transcriptome, suggesting that the transcriptional regulation of meiosis evolved independently in both species.
Abstract: Sexual reproduction requires meiosis to produce haploid gametes, which in turn can fuse to regenerate a diploid organism. We have studied the transcriptional program that drives this developmental process in Schizosaccharomyces pombe using DNA microarrays. Here we show that hundreds of genes are regulated in successive waves of transcription that correlate with major biological events of meiosis and sporulation. Each wave is associated with specific promoter motifs. Clusters of neighboring genes (mostly close to telomeres) are co-expressed early in the process, which reflects a more global control of these genes. We find that two Atf-like transcription factors are essential for the expression of late genes and formation of spores, and identify dozens of potential Atf target genes. Comparison with the meiotic program of the distantly related Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals an unexpectedly small shared meiotic transcriptome, suggesting that the transcriptional regulation of meiosis evolved independently in both species.

479 citations


Authors

Showing all 4058 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Nicholas J. Wareham2121657204896
Gonçalo R. Abecasis179595230323
Panos Deloukas162410154018
Michael R. Stratton161443142586
David W. Johnson1602714140778
Michael John Owen1601110135795
Naveed Sattar1551326116368
Robert E. W. Hancock15277588481
Julian Parkhill149759104736
Nilesh J. Samani149779113545
Michael Conlon O'Donovan142736118857
Jian Yang1421818111166
Christof Koch141712105221
Andrew G. Clark140823123333
Stylianos E. Antonarakis13874693605
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Broad Institute
11.6K papers, 1.5M citations

96% related

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
34.6K papers, 5.2M citations

95% related

Laboratory of Molecular Biology
24.2K papers, 2.1M citations

94% related

Salk Institute for Biological Studies
13.1K papers, 1.6M citations

93% related

National Institutes of Health
297.8K papers, 21.3M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202317
202270
2021836
2020810
2019854
2018764