scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction

About
The article was published on 1990-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 1129 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Critical thinking & Educational assessment.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Online teaching strategies to improve collaboration among nursing students

TL;DR: The design characteristics and educational benefits of three online-teaching strategies that nurse educators can use to build the critical thinking and social skills needed for effective collaboration: computer supported collaborative learning, case-based facilitated discussion, and cognitive flexibility hypermedia are compared.
Journal ArticleDOI

Teaching and Evaluating Critical Thinking in an Environmental Context

TL;DR: In this paper, a pilot study with an undergraduate forest issues course designed to increase critical thinking skills in students and move them toward responsible environmental citizenship was conducted, finding that after the 15-week course, students significantly improved in critical-thinking skills (n = 16, p <.05) and skills were correlated with critical thinking dispositions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Philosophical Concerns About Interpreting AACSB Assurance of Learning Standards

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that these standards are likely to be interpreted and actioned in ways that do not support best practices in education, and compare the more traditional model of liberal arts education to the predominant model evolving in schools of business today.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nationwide Testing of Critical Thinking for Higher Education: Vigilance Required

TL;DR: In this article, Ennis recommends cooperation by critical-thinking faculty and administrators, but only if there is much less comparability and considerably deeper transparency of the tests and their justification than the Commission recommends and only if vigilance in handling the many problems and dangers elaborated herein is successful.
Journal ArticleDOI

Computational thinking is critical thinking: connecting to university discourse, goals, and learning outcomes

TL;DR: This paper compares computational and critical modes of thinking, identifying concepts and terminology that support cross‐disciplinary discourse, inform faculty and curriculum development efforts, and interconnect learning outcomes at the course, program and university level, thus helping programs better articulate contributions to institutional goals.