BookDOI
Sex differences in social behavior : a social-role interpretation
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The analysis of sex differences in social behavior is presented as a new theory and a new method based on research published in “Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A New Theory and a New Method.”Abstract:
Contents: The Analysis of Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A New Theory and a New Method. Sex Differences in Helping Behavior. Sex Differences in Aggressive Behavior. Sex Differences in Other Social Behaviors. The Interpretation of Sex Differences in Social Behavior.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?
TL;DR: Etude meta-analytique des recherches ayant utilise le paradigme experimental de Goldberg (1968), dans le but d'un examen critique des conclusions sur l'evaluation plus favorable, chez les femmes, des auteurs de sexe masculin this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders.
TL;DR: The investigation considered whether the perceived role incongruence between the female gender role and the leader role led to a female leader disadvantage or whether instead afemale leader advantage would emerge (as predicted by double standards and stereotype content research).
Journal ArticleDOI
Effects of media violence on viewers' aggression in unconstrained social interaction.
TL;DR: Exposure to media violence significantly enhanced viewers' aggressive behavior when the findings were aggregated across studies, but the effect was not uniform across investigations.
Journal ArticleDOI
Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion.
TL;DR: Women were more communal regardless of social role status; women were especially communal with other women, compared with men with men, which supported a social role theory interpretation of gender differences.
Journal ArticleDOI
When distress hits home: the role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees' responses to abusive supervision.
TL;DR: A model of the relationships among aggressive norms, abusive supervision, psychological distress, family undermining, and supervisor-directed deviance revealed that abusive supervision mediated the relationship between aggressive norms and psychological distress.