scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Cardiff University

EducationCardiff, United Kingdom
About: Cardiff University is a education organization based out in Cardiff, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 34188 authors who have published 82643 publications receiving 3046531 citations. The organization is also known as: University of Cardiff & University College of South Wales and Monmouthshire.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the results from the Herschel Gould Belt survey for the B211/L1495 region in the Taurus molecular cloud were presented, which revealed the structure of the dense, star-forming filament B211 with unprecedented detail, along with the presence of striations perpendicular to the filament.
Abstract: We present first results from the Herschel Gould Belt survey for the B211/L1495 region in the Taurus molecular cloud. Thanks to their high sensitivity and dynamic range, the Herschel images reveal the structure of the dense, star-forming filament B211 with unprecedented detail, along with the presence of striations perpendicular to the filament and generally oriented along the magnetic field direction as traced by optical polarization vectors. Based on the column density and dust temperature maps derived from the Herschel data, we find that the radial density profile of the B211 filament approaches power-law behavior, ρ ∝ r−2.0± 0.4, at large radii and that the temperature profile exhibits a marked drop at small radii. The observed density and temperature profiles of the B211 filament are in good agreement with a theoretical model of a cylindrical filament undergoing gravitational contraction with a polytropic equation of state: P ∝ ργ and T ∝ ργ−1, with γ = 0.97 ± 0.01 < 1 (i.e., not strictly isothermal). The morphology of the column density map, where some of the perpendicular striations are apparently connected to the B211 filament, further suggests that the material may be accreting along the striations onto the main filament. The typical velocities expected for the infalling material in this picture are ~0.5–1 km s-1, which are consistent with the existing kinematical constraints from previous CO observations.

565 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article investigated public scepticism about climate change in Britain using the trend, attribution, and impact scepticism framework of Rahmstorf (2004) and found that climate scepticism is currently not widespread in Britain.
Abstract: This study presents a detailed investigation of public scepticism about climate change in Britain using the trend, attribution, and impact scepticism framework of Rahmstorf (2004). The study found that climate scepticism is currently not widespread in Britain. Although uncertainty and scepticism about the potential impacts of climate change were fairly common, both trend and attribution scepticism were far less prevalent. It further showed that the different types of scepticism are strongly interrelated. Although this may suggest that the general public does not clearly distinguish between the different aspects of the climate debate, there is a clear gradation in prevalence along the Rahmstorf typology. Climate scepticism appeared particularly common among older individuals from lower socio-economic backgrounds who are politically conservative and hold traditional values; while it is less common among younger individuals from higher socio-economic backgrounds who hold self-transcendence and environmental values. The finding that climate scepticism is rooted in people's core values and worldviews may imply a coherent and encompassing sceptical outlook on climate change. However, attitudinal certainty appeared mainly concentrated in non-sceptical groups, suggesting that climate sceptical views are not held very firmly. Implications of the findings for climate change communication and engagement are discussed.

564 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The data support the view that honey bees are in decline at least in some regions, which is probably closely linked to the decreasing number of beekeepers.
Abstract: Growing evidence indicates that European managed honey bees are in decline, but information for Europe remains patchy and localized. Here we compile data from 18 European countries to assess trends in the number of honey bee colonies and beekeepers between 1965 and 2005. We found consistent declines in colony numbers in central European countries and some increases in Mediterranean countries. Beekeeper numbers have declined in all of the European countries examined. Our data support the view that honey bees are in decline at least in some regions, which is probably closely linked to the decreasing number of beekeepers. Our data on colony numbers and beekeepers must, however, be interpreted with caution due to different approaches and socioeconomic factors in the various countries, thereby limiting their comparability. We therefore make specific recommendations for standardized methodologies to be adopted at the national and global level to assist in the future monitoring of honey bees.

564 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Emanuele Di Angelantonio1, Stephen Kaptoge1, David Wormser1, Peter Willeit1, Adam S. Butterworth1, Narinder Bansal1, Linda M. O’Keeffe1, Pei Gao1, Angela M. Wood1, Stephen Burgess1, Daniel F. Freitag1, Lisa Pennells1, Sanne A.E. Peters2, Carole L. Hart3, Lise Lund Håheim4, Richard F. Gillum5, Børge G. Nordestgaard6, Bruce M. Psaty7, Bu B. Yeap8, Matthew Knuiman8, Paul J. Nietert9, Jussi Kauhanen10, Jukka T. Salonen11, Lewis H. Kuller12, Leon A. Simons13, Yvonne T. van der Schouw2, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor14, Randi Selmer15, Carlos J. Crespo16, Beatriz L. Rodriguez17, W. M. Monique Verschuren, Veikko Salomaa18, Kurt Svärdsudd19, Pim van der Harst20, Cecilia Björkelund21, Lars Wilhelmsen21, Robert B. Wallace22, Hermann Brenner23, Philippe Amouyel24, Elizabeth L M Barr25, Hiroyasu Iso26, Altan Onat27, Maurizio Trevisan28, Ralph B. D'Agostino29, Cyrus Cooper30, Cyrus Cooper31, Maryam Kavousi32, Lennart Welin, Ronan Roussel33, Ronan Roussel34, Frank B. Hu35, Shinichi Sato, Karina W. Davidson36, Barbara V. Howard37, Maarten J.G. Leening32, Annika Rosengren21, Marcus Dörr38, Dorly J. H. Deeg39, Stefan Kiechl, Coen D.A. Stehouwer40, Aulikki Nissinen18, Simona Giampaoli41, Chiara Donfrancesco41, Daan Kromhout42, Jackie F. Price43, Annette Peters, Tom W. Meade44, Edoardo Casiglia45, Debbie A Lawlor46, John Gallacher47, Dorothea Nagel48, Oscar H. Franco32, Gerd Assmann, Gilles R. Dagenais, J. Wouter Jukema49, Johan Sundström19, Mark Woodward50, Eric J. Brunner51, Kay-Tee Khaw1, Nicholas J. Wareham52, Eric A. Whitsel53, Inger Njølstad54, Bo Hedblad55, Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller56, Gunnar Engström55, Wayne D. Rosamond53, Elizabeth Selvin57, Naveed Sattar3, Simon G. Thompson1, John Danesh1 
University of Cambridge1, Utrecht University2, University of Glasgow3, University of Oslo4, Howard University5, Copenhagen University Hospital6, University of Washington7, University of Western Australia8, Medical University of South Carolina9, University of Eastern Finland10, Analytical Services11, University of Pittsburgh12, University of New South Wales13, University of California, San Diego14, Norwegian Institute of Public Health15, Portland State University16, University of Hawaii17, National Institutes of Health18, Uppsala University19, University Medical Center Groningen20, University of Gothenburg21, University of Iowa22, German Cancer Research Center23, Pasteur Institute24, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute25, Osaka University26, Istanbul University27, City College of New York28, Boston University29, University of Oxford30, University of Southampton31, Erasmus University Rotterdam32, French Institute of Health and Medical Research33, Paris Diderot University34, Harvard University35, Columbia University Medical Center36, MedStar Health37, Greifswald University Hospital38, VU University Amsterdam39, Maastricht University Medical Centre40, Istituto Superiore di Sanità41, Wageningen University and Research Centre42, University of Edinburgh43, University of London44, University of Padua45, University of Bristol46, Cardiff University47, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich48, Leiden University Medical Center49, University of Sydney50, University College London51, Medical Research Council52, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill53, University of Tromsø54, Lund University55, Albert Einstein College of Medicine56, Johns Hopkins University57
07 Jul 2015-JAMA
TL;DR: Because any combination of these conditions was associated with multiplicative mortality risk, life expectancy was substantially lower in people with multimorbidity.
Abstract: IMPORTANCE: The prevalence of cardiometabolic multimorbidity is increasing. OBJECTIVE: To estimate reductions in life expectancy associated with cardiometabolic multimorbidity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Age- and sex-adjusted mortality rates and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using individual participant data from the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (689,300 participants; 91 cohorts; years of baseline surveys: 1960-2007; latest mortality follow-up: April 2013; 128,843 deaths). The HRs from the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration were compared with those from the UK Biobank (499,808 participants; years of baseline surveys: 2006-2010; latest mortality follow-up: November 2013; 7995 deaths). Cumulative survival was estimated by applying calculated age-specific HRs for mortality to contemporary US age-specific death rates. EXPOSURES: A history of 2 or more of the following: diabetes mellitus, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: All-cause mortality and estimated reductions in life expectancy. RESULTS: In participants in the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration without a history of diabetes, stroke, or MI at baseline (reference group), the all-cause mortality rate adjusted to the age of 60 years was 6.8 per 1000 person-years. Mortality rates per 1000 person-years were 15.6 in participants with a history of diabetes, 16.1 in those with stroke, 16.8 in those with MI, 32.0 in those with both diabetes and MI, 32.5 in those with both diabetes and stroke, 32.8 in those with both stroke and MI, and 59.5 in those with diabetes, stroke, and MI. Compared with the reference group, the HRs for all-cause mortality were 1.9 (95% CI, 1.8-2.0) in participants with a history of diabetes, 2.1 (95% CI, 2.0-2.2) in those with stroke, 2.0 (95% CI, 1.9-2.2) in those with MI, 3.7 (95% CI, 3.3-4.1) in those with both diabetes and MI, 3.8 (95% CI, 3.5-4.2) in those with both diabetes and stroke, 3.5 (95% CI, 3.1-4.0) in those with both stroke and MI, and 6.9 (95% CI, 5.7-8.3) in those with diabetes, stroke, and MI. The HRs from the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration were similar to those from the more recently recruited UK Biobank. The HRs were little changed after further adjustment for markers of established intermediate pathways (eg, levels of lipids and blood pressure) and lifestyle factors (eg, smoking, diet). At the age of 60 years, a history of any 2 of these conditions was associated with 12 years of reduced life expectancy and a history of all 3 of these conditions was associated with 15 years of reduced life expectancy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Mortality associated with a history of diabetes, stroke, or MI was similar for each condition. Because any combination of these conditions was associated with multiplicative mortality risk, life expectancy was substantially lower in people with multimorbidity.

564 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In patients with moderate or severe Alzheimer's disease, continued treatment with donepezil was associated with cognitive benefits that exceeded the minimum clinically important difference and with significant functional benefits over the course of 12 months.
Abstract: A b s t r ac t Background Clinical trials have shown the benefits of cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. It is not known whether treatment benefits continue after the progression to moderate-to-severe disease. Methods We assigned 295 community-dwelling patients who had been treated with donepezil for at least 3 months and who had moderate or severe Alzheimer’s disease (a score of 5 to 13 on the Standardized Mini–Mental State Examination [SMMSE, on which scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function]) to continue donepezil, discontinue donepezil, discontinue donepezil and start memantine, or continue donepezil and start memantine. Patients received the study treatment for 52 weeks. The coprimary outcomes were scores on the SMMSE and on the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BADLS, on which scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater impairment). The minimum clinically important differences were 1.4 points on the SMMSE and 3.5 points on the BADLS. Results Patients assigned to continue donepezil, as compared with those assigned to discontinue donepezil, had a score on the SMMSE that was higher by an average of 1.9 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 2.5) and a score on the BADLS that was lower (indicating less impairment) by 3.0 points (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.3) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Patients assigned to receive memantine, as compared with those assigned to receive memantine placebo, had a score on the SMMSE that was an average of 1.2 points higher (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.8; P<0.001) and a score on the BADLS that was 1.5 points lower (95% CI, 0.3 to 2.8; P = 0.02). The efficacy of donepezil and of memantine did not differ significantly in the presence or absence of the other. There were no significant benefits of the combination of donepezil and memantine over donepezil alone. Conclusions In patients with moderate or severe Alzheimer’s disease, continued treatment with donepezil was associated with cognitive benefits that exceeded the minimum clinically important difference and with significant functional benefits over the course of 12 months. (Funded by the U.K. Medical Research Council and the U.K. Alzheimer’s Society; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN49545035.)

563 citations


Authors

Showing all 34629 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Rob Knight2011061253207
Stephen V. Faraone1881427140298
John J.V. McMurray1781389184502
David R. Williams1782034138789
John Hardy1771178171694
Dorret I. Boomsma1761507136353
Kay-Tee Khaw1741389138782
Anders Björklund16576984268
Edward T. Bullmore165746112463
Peter A. R. Ade1621387138051
Michael John Owen1601110135795
Gavin Davies1592036149835
Suvadeep Bose154960129071
Todd Adams1541866143110
John R. Hodges14981282709
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Manchester
168K papers, 6.4M citations

98% related

University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

97% related

University of Bristol
113.1K papers, 4.9M citations

96% related

University of Edinburgh
151.6K papers, 6.6M citations

95% related

University of Cambridge
282.2K papers, 14.4M citations

95% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023139
2022769
20214,868
20204,931
20194,464
20184,379