scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Seoul National University

EducationSeoul, South Korea
About: Seoul National University is a education organization based out in Seoul, South Korea. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Catalysis. The organization has 65879 authors who have published 138759 publications receiving 3715170 citations. The organization is also known as: SNU & Seoul-dae.
Topics: Population, Catalysis, Thin film, Gene, Cancer


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the surface lattice structures of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 were investigated under various cutoff voltage conditions, and it was shown that the pristine rhombohedral phase tends to transform into a mixture of spinel and rock salt phases.
Abstract: LiNixCoyMnzO2 (NCM, 0 ≤ x,y,z 4.3 V) required for high capacity is inevitably accompanied by a more rapid capacity fade over numerous cycles. Here, the degradation mechanisms of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 are investigated during cycling under various cutoff voltage conditions. The surface lattice structures of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 are observed to suffer from an irreversible transformation; the type of transformation depends on the cutoff voltage conditions. The surface of the pristine rhombohedral phase tends to transform into a mixture of spinel and rock salt phases. Moreover, the formation of the rock salt phase is more dominant under a higher voltage operation (≈4.8 V), which is attributable to the highly oxidative environment that triggers the oxygen loss from the surface of the material. The presence of the ionically insulating rock salt phase may result in sluggish kinetics, thus deteriorating the capacity retention. This implies that the prevention of surface structural degradation can provide the means to produce and retain high capacity, as well as stabilize the cycle life of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 during high-voltage operations.

893 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Jingjing Liang1, Thomas W. Crowther2, Nicolas Picard3, Susan K. Wiser4, Mo Zhou1, Giorgio Alberti5, Ernst Detlef Schulze6, A. David McGuire7, Fabio Bozzato, Hans Pretzsch8, Sergio de-Miguel, Alain Paquette9, Bruno Hérault10, Michael Scherer-Lorenzen11, Christopher B. Barrett12, Henry B. Glick2, Geerten M. Hengeveld13, Gert-Jan Nabuurs13, Sebastian Pfautsch14, Helder Viana15, Helder Viana16, Alexander Christian Vibrans, Christian Ammer17, Peter Schall17, David David Verbyla7, N. M. Tchebakova18, Markus Fischer19, James V. Watson1, Han Y. H. Chen20, Xiangdong Lei, Mart-Jan Schelhaas13, Huicui Lu13, Damiano Gianelle, Elena I. Parfenova18, Christian Salas21, Eungul Lee1, Boknam Lee22, Hyun-Seok Kim, Helge Bruelheide23, David A. Coomes24, Daniel Piotto, Terry Sunderland25, Terry Sunderland26, Bernhard Schmid27, Sylvie Gourlet-Fleury, Bonaventure Sonké28, Rebecca Tavani3, Jun Zhu29, Susanne Brandl8, Jordi Vayreda, Fumiaki Kitahara, Eric B. Searle20, Victor J. Neldner30, Michael R. Ngugi30, Christopher Baraloto31, Christopher Baraloto32, Lorenzo Frizzera, Radomir Bałazy33, Jacek Oleksyn34, Jacek Oleksyn35, Tomasz Zawiła-Niedźwiecki36, Olivier Bouriaud37, Filippo Bussotti38, Leena Finér, Bogdan Jaroszewicz39, Tommaso Jucker24, Fernando Valladares40, Fernando Valladares41, Andrzej M. Jagodziński35, Pablo Luis Peri42, Pablo Luis Peri43, Pablo Luis Peri44, Christelle Gonmadje28, William Marthy45, Timothy G. O'Brien45, Emanuel H. Martin46, Andrew R. Marshall47, Francesco Rovero, Robert Bitariho, Pascal A. Niklaus27, Patricia Alvarez-Loayza48, Nurdin Chamuya49, Renato Valencia50, Frédéric Mortier, Verginia Wortel, Nestor L. Engone-Obiang51, Leandro Valle Ferreira52, David E. Odeke, R. Vásquez, Simon L. Lewis53, Simon L. Lewis54, Peter B. Reich34, Peter B. Reich14 
West Virginia University1, Yale University2, Food and Agriculture Organization3, Landcare Research4, University of Udine5, Max Planck Society6, University of Alaska Fairbanks7, Technische Universität München8, Université du Québec à Montréal9, University of the French West Indies and Guiana10, University of Freiburg Faculty of Biology11, Cornell University12, Wageningen University and Research Centre13, University of Sydney14, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro15, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu16, University of Göttingen17, Russian Academy of Sciences18, Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research19, Lakehead University20, University of La Frontera21, Seoul National University22, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg23, University of Cambridge24, James Cook University25, Center for International Forestry Research26, University of Zurich27, University of Yaoundé I28, University of Wisconsin-Madison29, Queensland Government30, Florida International University31, Institut national de la recherche agronomique32, Forest Research Institute33, University of Minnesota34, Polish Academy of Sciences35, Warsaw University of Life Sciences36, Ştefan cel Mare University of Suceava37, University of Florence38, University of Warsaw39, Spanish National Research Council40, King Juan Carlos University41, National Scientific and Technical Research Council42, International Trademark Association43, National University of Austral Patagonia44, Wildlife Conservation Society45, College of African Wildlife Management46, University of York47, Durham University48, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources49, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador50, Centre national de la recherche scientifique51, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi52, University of Leeds53, University College London54
14 Oct 2016-Science
TL;DR: A consistent positive concave-down effect of biodiversity on forest productivity across the world is revealed, showing that a continued biodiversity loss would result in an accelerating decline in forest productivity worldwide.
Abstract: The biodiversity-productivity relationship (BPR) is foundational to our understanding of the global extinction crisis and its impacts on ecosystem functioning. Understanding BPR is critical for the accurate valuation and effective conservation of biodiversity. Using ground-sourced data from 777,126 permanent plots, spanning 44 countries and most terrestrial biomes, we reveal a globally consistent positive concave-down BPR, showing that continued biodiversity loss would result in an accelerating decline in forest productivity worldwide. The value of biodiversity in maintaining commercial forest productivity alone-US$166 billion to 490 billion per year according to our estimation-is more than twice what it would cost to implement effective global conservation. This highlights the need for a worldwide reassessment of biodiversity values, forest management strategies, and conservation priorities.

889 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is recommended that antioxidant capacity be expressed as vitamin C mg/100 g equivalent (VCEAC) using the ABTS assay, which can be used in both organic and aqueous solvent systems, employs a specific absorbance at a wavelength remote from the visible region, and requires a short reaction time.
Abstract: To express the antioxidant capacity of plant foods in a more familiar and easily understood manner (equivalent to vitamin C mg/100 g), two stable radical species, ABTS•- and DPPH•, commonly used for antioxidant activity measurements, were employed independently to evaluate their efficacies using apple polyphenolic extracts and seven polyphenolic standards including synthetic Trolox. Their antioxidant activities were expressed as vitamin C equivalent antioxidant capacity (VCEAC) in mg/100 g apple or mg/100 mL of the reference chemical compounds in 10 and 30 min using the ABTS•- and DPPH• scavenging assays, respectively. The antioxidant capacity of Gala apples and seven phenolic standards, determined by both ABTS•- and DPPH• scavenging assays, showed a dose−response of the first-order. Fresh Gala apples had a VCEAC of 205.4 ± 5.6 mg/100 g using the ABTS assay, and the relative VCEACs of phenolic standards were as follows: gallic acid > quercetin > epicatechin > catechin > vitamin C > rutin > chlorogenic ac...

889 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A draft genome sequence of Brassica oleracea is described, comparing it with that of its sister species B. rapa to reveal numerous chromosome rearrangements and asymmetrical gene loss in duplicated genomic blocks.
Abstract: Polyploidization has provided much genetic variation for plant adaptive evolution, but the mechanisms by which the molecular evolution of polyploid genomes establishes genetic architecture underlying species differentiation are unclear Brassica is an ideal model to increase knowledge of polyploid evolution Here we describe a draft genome sequence of Brassica oleracea, comparing it with that of its sister species B rapa to reveal numerous chromosome rearrangements and asymmetrical gene loss in duplicated genomic blocks, asymmetrical amplification of transposable elements, differential gene co-retention for specific pathways and variation in gene expression, including alternative splicing, among a large number of paralogous and orthologous genes Genes related to the production of anticancer phytochemicals and morphological variations illustrate consequences of genome duplication and gene divergence, imparting biochemical and morphological variation to B oleracea This study provides insights into Brassica genome evolution and will underpin research into the many important crops in this genus

884 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Jens Kattge1, Gerhard Bönisch2, Sandra Díaz3, Sandra Lavorel  +751 moreInstitutions (314)
TL;DR: The extent of the trait data compiled in TRY is evaluated and emerging patterns of data coverage and representativeness are analyzed to conclude that reducing data gaps and biases in the TRY database remains a key challenge and requires a coordinated approach to data mobilization and trait measurements.
Abstract: Plant traits-the morphological, anatomical, physiological, biochemical and phenological characteristics of plants-determine how plants respond to environmental factors, affect other trophic levels, and influence ecosystem properties and their benefits and detriments to people. Plant trait data thus represent the basis for a vast area of research spanning from evolutionary biology, community and functional ecology, to biodiversity conservation, ecosystem and landscape management, restoration, biogeography and earth system modelling. Since its foundation in 2007, the TRY database of plant traits has grown continuously. It now provides unprecedented data coverage under an open access data policy and is the main plant trait database used by the research community worldwide. Increasingly, the TRY database also supports new frontiers of trait-based plant research, including the identification of data gaps and the subsequent mobilization or measurement of new data. To support this development, in this article we evaluate the extent of the trait data compiled in TRY and analyse emerging patterns of data coverage and representativeness. Best species coverage is achieved for categorical traits-almost complete coverage for 'plant growth form'. However, most traits relevant for ecology and vegetation modelling are characterized by continuous intraspecific variation and trait-environmental relationships. These traits have to be measured on individual plants in their respective environment. Despite unprecedented data coverage, we observe a humbling lack of completeness and representativeness of these continuous traits in many aspects. We, therefore, conclude that reducing data gaps and biases in the TRY database remains a key challenge and requires a coordinated approach to data mobilization and trait measurements. This can only be achieved in collaboration with other initiatives.

882 citations


Authors

Showing all 66324 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Hyun-Chul Kim1764076183227
Adi F. Gazdar157776104116
Alfred L. Goldberg15647488296
Yongsun Kim1562588145619
David J. Mooney15669594172
Roberto Romero1511516108321
Jongmin Lee1502257134772
Byung-Sik Hong1461557105696
Inkyu Park1441767109433
Teruki Kamon1422034115633
John L. Hopper140122986392
Ali Khademhosseini14088776430
Taeghwan Hyeon13956375814
Suyong Choi135149597053
Intae Yu134137289870
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Korea University
82.4K papers, 1.8M citations

98% related

Kyungpook National University
42.1K papers, 834.6K citations

97% related

Yonsei University
106.1K papers, 2.2M citations

97% related

Sungkyunkwan University
56.4K papers, 1.3M citations

97% related

Hanyang University
58.8K papers, 1.1M citations

97% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023241
2022768
20218,297
20208,368
20198,175
20187,617