scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of St Andrews

EducationSt Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom
About: University of St Andrews is a education organization based out in St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Laser. The organization has 16260 authors who have published 43364 publications receiving 1636072 citations. The organization is also known as: St Andrews University & University of St. Andrews.
Topics: Population, Laser, Stars, Catalysis, Galaxy


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
13 Jul 1968-Nature
TL;DR: The standard appearances of negatively and positively stained fibrils are shown and the correlation between the two staining patterns in that figure is based on the findings of Nemetschek5.
Abstract: THE length of the tropocollagen (TC) molecule is about 44 times that of the native collagen period (D) (refs 1–4) The standard appearances of negatively and positively stained fibrils are shown in Fig 1 and the correlation between the two staining patterns in that figure is based on the findings of Nemetschek5

309 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The earlier N300 effects, which do not appear to occur when ERPs are evoked by semantically primed and unprimed words, could suggest that the semantic processing of pictorial stimuli involves neural systems different from those associated with the semanticprocessing of words.

309 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work proposes a standard protocol for reporting SDMs, and introduces a structured format for documenting and communicating the models, ensuring transparency and reproducibility, facilitating peer review and expert evaluation of model quality, as well as meta-analyses.
Abstract: Species distribution models (SDMs) constitute the most common class of models across ecology, evolution and conservation. The advent of ready-to-use software pack - ages and increasing availability of digital geoinformation have considerably assisted the application of SDMs in the past decade, greatly enabling their broader use for informing conservation and management, and for quantifying impacts from global change. However, models must be fit for purpose, with all important aspects of their development and applications properly considered. Despite the widespread use of SDMs, standardisation and documentation of modelling protocols remain limited, which makes it hard to assess whether development steps are appropriate for end use. To address these issues, we propose a standard protocol for reporting SDMs, with an emphasis on describing how a study’s objective is achieved through a series of model - ing decisions. We call this the ODMAP (Overview, Data, Model, Assessment and Prediction) protocol, as its components reflect the main steps involved in building SDMs and other empirically-based biodiversity models. The ODMAP protocol serves two main purposes. First, it provides a checklist for authors, detailing key steps for model building and analyses, and thus represents a quick guide and generic workflow for modern SDMs. Second, it introduces a structured format for documenting and communicating the models, ensuring transparency and reproducibility, facilitating peer review and expert evaluation of model quality, as well as meta-analyses. We detail all elements of ODMAP, and explain how it can be used for different model objectives and applications, and how it complements efforts to store associated metadata and define modelling standards. We illustrate its utility by revisiting nine previously published case studies, and provide an interactive web-based application to facilitate its use. We plan to advance ODMAP by encouraging its further refinement and adoption by the scientific community.

309 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The value of studying a circuit of moderate, but tractable, complexity and known behavioral function is illustrated by studies of the giant axons of the crayfish nerve cord.

308 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jun 1989-Heredity
TL;DR: The population genetic structure of Arabidopsis thaliana was investigated in and among 16 British populations by means of an electrophoretic survey of nine enzyme systems and there was no evidence of a division between English and Scottish populations based on genetic distance.
Abstract: The population genetic structure of Arabidopsis thaliana was investigated in and among 16 British populations by means of an electrophoretic survey of nine enzyme systems. Seven out of 17 allozyme loci examined were polymorphic. One polymorphic locus was used as a marker locus for estimating outcrossing rates. No outcrossing was observed within any of seven populations surveyed and a joint estimate of the upper limit of outcrossing, tu, indicated that average outcrossing in the wild does not exceed 0·3 per cent. The genetic structure of A. thaliana as measured by Nei's gene diversity statistics, gene correlation F statistics, and estimates of multilocus genotypic diversity is concordant with that which is expected for a plant species which shows almost complete uniparental reproduction. Despite considerable genetic differentiation between populations, there was no evidence of a division between English and Scottish populations based on genetic distance.

308 citations


Authors

Showing all 16531 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Yi Chen2174342293080
Paul M. Thompson1832271146736
Ian J. Deary1661795114161
Dongyuan Zhao160872106451
Mark J. Smyth15371388783
Harry Campbell150897115457
William J. Sutherland14896694423
Thomas J. Smith1401775113919
John A. Peacock140565125416
Jean-Marie Tarascon136853137673
David A. Jackson136109568352
Ian Ford13467885769
Timothy J. Mitchison13340466418
Will J. Percival12947387752
David P. Lane12956890787
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Oxford
258.1K papers, 12.9M citations

94% related

University of Cambridge
282.2K papers, 14.4M citations

94% related

University of Edinburgh
151.6K papers, 6.6M citations

93% related

University of Manchester
168K papers, 6.4M citations

93% related

University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023127
2022388
20211,998
20201,996
20192,059
20181,946