One percent determination of the primordial deuterium abundance.
read more
Citations
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
The Simons Observatory : Science goals and forecasts
Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
References
Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment
Planck 2015 results - XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy
The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation
Related Papers (5)
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample
Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
Frequently Asked Questions (13)
Q2. What have the authors stated for future works in "One percent determination of the primordial deuterium abundance" ?
The authors also perform a joint analysis of D/H and the Planck CMB data to place a bound on the effective number of neutrino species. Given that the CMB is now limited by cosmic variance at scales l103—the multipole regime where the temperature fluctuations are very sensitive to the baryon density—it will become increasingly difficult to significantly improve the precision of hB,0 2W derived from the CMB. In addition, there are exciting opportunities in the immediate future to further increase the statistics of D/H with the The Echelle SPectrograph for Rocky Exoplanet and Stable Spectroscopic Observations ( ESPRESSO ) spectrograph on the European Southern Observatory Very Large Telescope, and potentially in the longer term with the 30–40m class telescopes. The authors also thank an anonymous referee who provided helpful suggestions that improved the presentation of this work, following a referee who was unable to respond in a timely manner.
Q3. How many DLAs are available to determine the total D The authorcolumn density?
In this H The authorcolumn density regime, the H The authorLyα transition exhibits Lorentzian damped wings that uniquely determine the total H Icolumn density, while up to ∼10 high order unsaturated D The authorlines are available to determine the total D The authorcolumn density.
Q4. Why do the authors only estimate the oxygen abundance of this absorption system?
Due to the presence of ionized gas, the authors only provide an estimate of the oxygen abundance of this absorption system; N(O I)/N(H I) is considered a reliable measure of the [O/H] abundance,17 since O The authoraccurately traces the H The authorgas due to charge transfer reactions (Field & Steigman 1971).
Q5. What is the resulting D The authorcolumn density?
The D The authorcolumn density only depends on the equivalent widths of several weak absorption lines, while the Lorentzian damped H The authorLyα line uniquely determines the H The authorcolumn density.
Q6. What are the available measurements of the primordial element abundances?
The best available measurements of the primordial element abundances come from different environments; conventionally, the mass fraction of 4He (YP) is derived from the emission lines of nearby H II regions in metal-poor star-forming galaxies (Izotov et al.
Q7. What is the probability of the CMB value of hB,0 2W?
Given that the CMB is now limited by cosmic variance at scales l103—the multipole regime where the temperature fluctuations are very sensitive to the baryon density—it will become increasingly difficult to significantly improve the precision of hB,0 2W derived from the CMB.
Q8. What is the initial starting parameter value of the logarithmic N(D I)/?
The initial starting parameter value of the logarithmic N(D I)/N(H I) ratio is drawn from a uniform distribution over the range (−4.7, −4.5).
Q9. What are the suitable environments to measure the primordial deuterium abundance?
have H The authorcolumn densities near the threshold of a damped Lyα system (DLA; N(H I);1020.3 cm−2)7 are the most suitable environments to precisely measure the primordial deuterium abundance, (D/H)P (see also Riemer-Sørensen et al. 2017).
Q10. What is the Doppler parameter for the absorption line?
The authors model the total Doppler parameter with a contribution from turbulent and thermal broadening:b b b b k T m2 1total 2 turb 2 therm 2 turb 2 B gas ion= + º + ( )where Tgas is the gas temperature, mion is the mass of the ion responsible for the absorption line, and kB is the Boltzmann constant.
Q11. What is the FWHM value of the thorium–argon slit?
Using an exposure of a thorium– argon (ThAr) lamp, the authors directly measured the instrument FWHM to be vFWHM=6.28±0.02 kms−1 based on 2192 emission lines; throughout their analysis, the authors adopt this FWHM value.9
Q12. How does the analysis compare to the observed wavelength?
This highlights the importance of obtaining high S/N data down to the Lyman limit which, in this case, corresponds to an observed wavelength of ∼3215Å.
Q13. Do the authors have to model the absorption lines as a Voigt profile?
the authors emphasize that the weak D The authorabsorption lines and the strong H The authordamped Lyα line do not depend on their choice to model the absorption lines as a Voigt profile.