scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality

Norman Daniels, +1 more
- 01 Jan 1985 - 
- Vol. 83, Iss: 1, pp 142
TLDR
Lawler as mentioned in this paper argued that being for the freeze means that one is not for disarmament, which is hardly a rational position in the sense that it is suspect if not immoral, in the eyes of some.
Abstract
that a plurality of the American Catholic bishops endorse a nuclear freeze (p. 4), saying that they are thus "taking their stance with Moscow,55 which is for a freeze, and not with the Vatican, which "is still in favor of disarmament?not a freeze.55 To make any sense at all, Mr. Lawler must mean that being for the freeze means that one is not for disarmament? hardly a rational position. One recalls here the arguments, during the 19305s and 19405s, that being for racial justice in the United States was suspect if not immoral, in the eyes of some, because the communists also favored it.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Normative Approaches to Ethnic Recognition and Accommodation:Their Applicability to the Nigerian Experience

TL;DR: This article explored the central theme in the normative philosophy arguments of Michael Walzer, Charles Taylor, and Will Kymlicka and their applicability to the state building processes and constitutional politics in Nigeria and concluded that strict application of the normative prescriptions in Nigeria's multiethnic society could trigger escalating cycles of ethno-political tensions, institutional instabilities, and demand by groups for exit from the Nigerian state.
Journal ArticleDOI

People vs God: The logic of ‘divine sovereignty' in Islamic democratic discourse

TL;DR: In this article, the role of the concept of "divine sovereignty" in the discussions which are taking place among Islamic thinkers concerning the possibility of democracy in an Islamic context is clarified.
Journal ArticleDOI

Aristotle's ethics and contemporary political philosophy: virtue and the human good

TL;DR: Gadamer as discussed by the authors argued that the human good is attained by openness to otherness and through suffering, and argued that community can be an arena in which to develop and exercise virtue.

The Case for Valuing Non-Health and Indirect Benefits

TL;DR: This chapter defends the view that indirect and non-health benefits should not be given lower priority than direct health benefits in the context of priority-setting in global health.