scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality

Norman Daniels, +1 more
- 01 Jan 1985 - 
- Vol. 83, Iss: 1, pp 142
TLDR
Lawler as mentioned in this paper argued that being for the freeze means that one is not for disarmament, which is hardly a rational position in the sense that it is suspect if not immoral, in the eyes of some.
Abstract
that a plurality of the American Catholic bishops endorse a nuclear freeze (p. 4), saying that they are thus "taking their stance with Moscow,55 which is for a freeze, and not with the Vatican, which "is still in favor of disarmament?not a freeze.55 To make any sense at all, Mr. Lawler must mean that being for the freeze means that one is not for disarmament? hardly a rational position. One recalls here the arguments, during the 19305s and 19405s, that being for racial justice in the United States was suspect if not immoral, in the eyes of some, because the communists also favored it.

read more

Citations
More filters

Why stay together?: A pluralist approach to secession and federation

TL;DR: The authors argued that traditional liberal political theory is ill-equipped to reply to questions which involve the legitimacy of boundaries of political communities, and this claim is substantiated by a more thorough examination of the question how state border ought to be drawn.
Journal ArticleDOI

Should Citizenship Be Conditional? The Ethics of Denationalization

TL;DR: The United Kingdom's Nationality, Immigration, and Asylum Act of 2002 as discussed by the authors attempted to create a "liberal" denationalization power, which was controversial in a number of liberal states.
Book

Religion und Gesellschaft

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors define context and explore how contexts affect behaviour, the social mechanisms that constitute a central condition to explain individual behaviour, and propose a multilevel model to demonstrate theoretical problems linking levels.
Journal ArticleDOI

Spaces of hospitality

Heidrun Friese, +1 more
- 01 Aug 2004 - 
TL;DR: In this article, the surveyor said, ‘You cannot stay here.’ ‘I didn't want to stay,' said K., 'I simply wanted a little rest. Forgive the impoliteness.'
Journal ArticleDOI

Coercion, Incarceration, and Chemical Castration: An Argument From Autonomy

TL;DR: This article argues that, even if consent would not be valid, offering chemical castration will often be supported by the very considerations that underpin concerns about consent: considerations of autonomy.