Institution
Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation
Government•Bangkok, Thailand•
About: Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation is a government organization based out in Bangkok, Thailand. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Biodiversity & Genus. The organization has 119 authors who have published 184 publications receiving 4707 citations. The organization is also known as: DNP & Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation.
Topics: Biodiversity, Genus, Population, Phylogenetic tree, Frugivore
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Konstanz1, University of Vienna2, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic3, University of Potsdam4, University of Göttingen5, Russian Academy of Sciences6, University of Canterbury7, Spanish National Research Council8, Monash University9, Alexander von Humboldt Biological Resources Research Institute10, University of Costa Rica11, Tomsk State University12, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University13, University of Coimbra14, University of Concepción15, Botanic Garden Meise16, University of Delhi17, University of the Republic18, Southern Illinois University Carbondale19, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation20, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg21, University of Oldenburg22, Sun Yat-sen University23, King Saud University24, Wageningen University and Research Centre25, Naturalis26, Charles University in Prague27, Stellenbosch University28
TL;DR: The results quantify for the first time the extent of plant naturalizations worldwide, and illustrate the urgent need for globally integrated efforts to control, manage and understand the spread of alien species.
Abstract: All around the globe, humans have greatly altered the abiotic and biotic environment with ever-increasing speed. One defining feature of the Anthropocene epoch is the erosion of biogeographical barriers by human-mediated dispersal of species into new regions, where they can naturalize and cause ecological, economic and social damage. So far, no comprehensive analysis of the global accumulation and exchange of alien plant species between continents has been performed, primarily because of a lack of data. Here we bridge this knowledge gap by using a unique global database on the occurrences of naturalized alien plant species in 481 mainland and 362 island regions. In total, 13,168 plant species, corresponding to 3.9% of the extant global vascular flora, or approximately the size of the native European flora, have become naturalized somewhere on the globe as a result of human activity. North America has accumulated the largest number of naturalized species, whereas the Pacific Islands show the fastest increase in species numbers with respect to their land area. Continents in the Northern Hemisphere have been the major donors of naturalized alien species to all other continents. Our results quantify for the first time the extent of plant naturalizations worldwide, and illustrate the urgent need for globally integrated efforts to control, manage and understand the spread of alien species.
704 citations
••
United States Geological Survey1, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute2, University of Nebraska–Lincoln3, University of Melbourne4, University of Cambridge5, University College London6, National University of Tucumán7, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation8, Smithsonian Institution9, National University of Colombia10, Wildlife Conservation Society11, University of La Réunion12, University of Washington13, Chinese Academy of Sciences14, Oregon State University15, University of California, Los Angeles16, Tunghai University17, National University of Jujuy18, Kasetsart University19, National Dong Hwa University20, Landcare Research21, University of Alcalá22
TL;DR: A global analysis of 403 tropical and temperate tree species shows that for most species mass growth rate increases continuously with tree size, which means large, old trees do not act simply as senescent carbon reservoirs but actively fix large amounts of carbon compared to smaller trees.
Abstract: Forests are major components of the global carbon cycle, providing substantial feedback to atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. Our ability to understand and predict changes in the forest carbon cycle--particularly net primary productivity and carbon storage--increasingly relies on models that represent biological processes across several scales of biological organization, from tree leaves to forest stands. Yet, despite advances in our understanding of productivity at the scales of leaves and stands, no consensus exists about the nature of productivity at the scale of the individual tree, in part because we lack a broad empirical assessment of whether rates of absolute tree mass growth (and thus carbon accumulation) decrease, remain constant, or increase as trees increase in size and age. Here we present a global analysis of 403 tropical and temperate tree species, showing that for most species mass growth rate increases continuously with tree size. Thus, large, old trees do not act simply as senescent carbon reservoirs but actively fix large amounts of carbon compared to smaller trees; at the extreme, a single big tree can add the same amount of carbon to the forest within a year as is contained in an entire mid-sized tree. The apparent paradoxes of individual tree growth increasing with tree size despite declining leaf-level and stand-level productivity can be explained, respectively, by increases in a tree's total leaf area that outpace declines in productivity per unit of leaf area and, among other factors, age-related reductions in population density. Our results resolve conflicting assumptions about the nature of tree growth, inform efforts to undertand and model forest carbon dynamics, and have additional implications for theories of resource allocation and plant senescence.
692 citations
••
Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute1, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute2, National Museum of Natural History3, University of Alabama4, Stanford University5, Wilfrid Laurier University6, Mahidol University7, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation8, University of Aberdeen9, Environmental Change Institute10, University of Queensland11, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden12, University of Buea13, Indiana University14, United States Forest Service15, Indian Institute of Science16, Chinese Academy of Sciences17, National University of Colombia18, Forest Research Institute Malaysia19, University of California, Santa Cruz20, University of Peradeniya21, University of Hong Kong22, University of Alberta23, Oak Ridge National Laboratory24, University of Wisconsin–Green Bay25, University of California, Los Angeles26, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources27, Wageningen University and Research Centre28, Kyoto University29, University of Nairobi30, Wildlife Conservation Society31, University of Montana32, Nanyang Technological University33, Utah State University34, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center35, Centre national de la recherche scientifique36, Natural England37, Washington University in St. Louis38, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic39, University of São Paulo40, University of the Philippines Diliman41, Harvard University42, University of Hawaii at Hilo43, Maejo University44, National Dong Hwa University45, University of Toronto46, Washington State University Vancouver47, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras48, Columbia University49, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador50, National Institute of Amazonian Research51, East China Normal University52, University of Minnesota53
TL;DR: The broad suite of measurements made at CTFS-ForestGEO sites makes it possible to investigate the complex ways in which global change is impacting forest dynamics, and continued monitoring will provide vital contributions to understanding worldwide forest diversity and dynamics in an era of global change.
Abstract: Global change is impacting forests worldwide, threatening biodiversity and ecosystem services including climate regulation. Understanding how forests respond is critical to forest conservation and climate protection. This review describes an international network of 59 long-term forest dynamics research sites (CTFS-ForestGEO) useful for characterizing forest responses to global change. Within very large plots (median size 25ha), all stems 1cm diameter are identified to species, mapped, and regularly recensused according to standardized protocols. CTFS-ForestGEO spans 25 degrees S-61 degrees N latitude, is generally representative of the range of bioclimatic, edaphic, and topographic conditions experienced by forests worldwide, and is the only forest monitoring network that applies a standardized protocol to each of the world's major forest biomes. Supplementary standardized measurements at subsets of the sites provide additional information on plants, animals, and ecosystem and environmental variables. CTFS-ForestGEO sites are experiencing multifaceted anthropogenic global change pressures including warming (average 0.61 degrees C), changes in precipitation (up to +/- 30% change), atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and sulfur compounds (up to 3.8g Nm(-2)yr(-1) and 3.1g Sm(-2)yr(-1)), and forest fragmentation in the surrounding landscape (up to 88% reduced tree cover within 5km). The broad suite of measurements made at CTFS-ForestGEO sites makes it possible to investigate the complex ways in which global change is impacting forest dynamics. Ongoing research across the CTFS-ForestGEO network is yielding insights into how and why the forests are changing, and continued monitoring will provide vital contributions to understanding worldwide forest diversity and dynamics in an era of global change.
470 citations
••
J. W. Ferry Slik, Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez1, Shin-ichiro Aiba2, Patricia Alvarez-Loayza3 +173 more•Institutions (74)
TL;DR: It is shown that most tree species are extremely rare, meaning that they may be under serious risk of extinction at current deforestation rates, and a methodological framework for estimating species richness in trees is provided that may help refine species richness estimates of tree-dependent taxa.
Abstract: The high species richness of tropical forests has long been recognized, yet there remains substantial uncertainty regarding the actual number of tropical tree species. Using a pantropical tree inventory database from closed canopy forests, consisting of 657,630 trees belonging to 11,371 species, we use a fitted value of Fisher's alpha and an approximate pantropical stem total to estimate the minimum number of tropical forest tree species to fall between similar to 40,000 and similar to 53,000, i.e., at the high end of previous estimates. Contrary to common assumption, the Indo-Pacific region was found to be as species-rich as the Neotropics, with both regions having a minimum of similar to 19,000-25,000 tree species. Continental Africa is relatively depauperate with a minimum of similar to 4,500-6,000 tree species. Very few species are shared among the African, American, and the Indo-Pacific regions. We provide a methodological framework for estimating species richness in trees that may help refine species richness estimates of tree-dependent taxa.
338 citations
••
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute1, Forest Research Institute Malaysia2, Earthwatch Institute3, Chinese Academy of Sciences4, University of Florida5, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute6, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center7, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation8, University of Queensland9, Environmental Change Institute10, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden11, Tunghai University12, University of Buea13, Indian Institute of Science14, Smithsonian Institution15, National University of Colombia16, University of Peradeniya17, University of Wisconsin–Green Bay18, National Taiwan University19, University of California, Los Angeles20, Osaka City University21, Thammasat University22, University of Montana23, Minzu University of China24, Utah State University25, Natural England26, University of Puerto Rico27, University of São Paulo28, University of Göttingen29, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador30, University of Toronto31, National Dong Hwa University32, Oregon State University33, University of the Philippines Diliman34
TL;DR: This work focuses on forests, which represent a majority of global biomass, productivity and biodiversity, and investigates the relationship between species richness and ecosystem function as measured by productivity or biomass.
Abstract: 1. The relationship between species richness and ecosystem function, as measured by productivity or biomass, is of long-standing theoretical and practical interest in ecology. This is especially true for forests, which represent a majority of global biomass, productivity and biodiversity.
256 citations
Authors
Showing all 119 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin | 36 | 77 | 7661 |
Somran Suddee | 10 | 78 | 774 |
Suchitra Changtragoon | 8 | 12 | 235 |
Watana Sakchoowong | 7 | 21 | 165 |
Achara Simcharoen | 7 | 13 | 231 |
Somphot Duangchantrasiri | 7 | 12 | 265 |
Saksit Simcharoen | 7 | 9 | 320 |
Prawat Wohandee | 6 | 6 | 130 |
Budsabong Kanchanasaka | 6 | 9 | 147 |
Kongkanda Chayamarit | 5 | 32 | 191 |
Winanda Himaman | 5 | 7 | 283 |
Sunate Karapan | 5 | 7 | 80 |
Samreong Panuthai | 5 | 7 | 86 |
Rachun Pooma | 4 | 13 | 48 |
Chumphon Suckasam | 4 | 4 | 176 |