scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

FacilityPotsdam, Germany
About: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research is a facility organization based out in Potsdam, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Climate change & Global warming. The organization has 1519 authors who have published 5098 publications receiving 367023 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The development of the DIVA tool is described, a user-friendly tool for assessing coastal vulnerability from subnational to global levels and making the data, scenarios and integrated model directly and freely available to end-users.
Abstract: A B S T R A C T This paper describes the development of the DIVA tool, a user-friendly tool for assessing coastal vulnerability from subnational to global levels. The development involved the two major challenges of integrating knowledge in the form of data, scenarios and models from various natural, social and engineering science disciplines and making this integrated knowledge accessible to a broad community of end-users. These challenges were addressed by (i) creating and applying the DIVA method, an iterative, modular method for developing integrating models amongst distributed partners and (ii) making the data, scenarios and integrated model, equipped with a powerful graphical user interface, directly and freely available to end-users.

225 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a set of climate impact scenarios on agricultural land productivity derived from two climate models and two biophysical crop growth models to account for some of the uncertainty inherent in climate and impact models.

224 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article examined the global and regional impacts of climate change on agricultural yields, area, production, consumption, prices and trade for coarse grains, rice, wheat, oilseeds and sugar crops to 2050.
Abstract: Previous studies have combined climate, crop and economic models to examine the impact of climate change on agricultural production and food security, but results have varied widely due to differences in models, scenarios and input data Recent work has examined (and narrowed) these differences through systematic model intercomparison using a high-emissions pathway to highlight the differences This paper extends that analysis to explore a range of plausible socioeconomic scenarios and emission pathways Results from multiple climate and economic models are combined to examine the global and regional impacts of climate change on agricultural yields, area, production, consumption, prices and trade for coarse grains, rice, wheat, oilseeds and sugar crops to 2050 We find that climate impacts on global average yields, area, production and consumption are similar across shared socioeconomic pathways (SSP 1, 2 and 3, as we implement them based on population, income and productivity drivers), except when changes in trade policies are included Impacts on trade and prices are higher for SSP 3 than SSP 2, and higher for SSP 2 than for SSP 1 Climate impacts for all variables are similar across low to moderate emissions pathways (RCP 45 and RCP 60), but increase for a higher emissions pathway (RCP 85) It is important to note that these global averages may hide regional variations Projected reductions in agricultural yields due to climate change by 2050 are larger for some crops than those estimated for the past half century, but smaller than projected increases to 2050 due to rising demand and intrinsic productivity growth Results illustrate the sensitivity of climate change impacts to differences in socioeconomic and emissions pathways Yield impacts increase at high emissions levels and vary with changes in population, income and technology, but are reduced in all cases by endogenous changes in prices and other variables

224 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGMIMI) project as mentioned in this paper is the first phase of the AgMIP (AgMIP) project, which includes global simulations of yields, phenologies, and many land-surface fluxes using 12-15 modeling groups for many crops, climate forcing data sets, and scenarios over the historical period from 1948 to 2012.
Abstract: . We present protocols and input data for Phase 1 of the Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison, a project of the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP). The project includes global simulations of yields, phenologies, and many land-surface fluxes using 12–15 modeling groups for many crops, climate forcing data sets, and scenarios over the historical period from 1948 to 2012. The primary outcomes of the project include (1) a detailed comparison of the major differences and similarities among global models commonly used for large-scale climate impact assessment, (2) an evaluation of model and ensemble hindcasting skill, (3) quantification of key uncertainties from climate input data, model choice, and other sources, and (4) a multi-model analysis of the agricultural impacts of large-scale climate extremes from the historical record.

223 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an approach for the statistical estimation of process-based dynamic range models (DRMs) that integrate Hutchinson's niche concept with spatial population dynamics, in a hierarchical Bayesian framework the environmental response of demographic rates, local population dynamics and dispersal are estimated conditional upon each other.
Abstract: Aim The study and prediction of species–environment relationships is currently mainly based on species distribution models. These purely correlative models neglect spatial population dynamics and assume that species distributions are in equilibrium with their environment. This causes biased estimates of species niches and handicaps forecasts of range dynamics under environmental change. Here we aim to develop an approach that statistically estimates process-based models of range dynamics from data on species distributions and permits a more comprehensive quantification of forecast uncertainties. Innovation We present an approach for the statistical estimation of process-based dynamic range models (DRMs) that integrate Hutchinson's niche concept with spatial population dynamics. In a hierarchical Bayesian framework the environmental response of demographic rates, local population dynamics and dispersal are estimated conditional upon each other while accounting for various sources of uncertainty. The method thus: (1) jointly infers species niches and spatiotemporal population dynamics from occurrence and abundance data, and (2) provides fully probabilistic forecasts of future range dynamics under environmental change. In a simulation study, we investigate the performance of DRMs for a variety of scenarios that differ in both ecological dynamics and the data used for model estimation. Main conclusions Our results demonstrate the importance of considering dynamic aspects in the collection and analysis of biodiversity data. In combination with informative data, the presented framework has the potential to markedly improve the quantification of ecological niches, the process-based understanding of range dynamics and the forecasting of species responses to environmental change. It thereby strengthens links between biogeography, population biology and theoretical and applied ecology.

223 citations


Authors

Showing all 1589 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Carl Folke133360125990
Adam Drewnowski10648641107
Jürgen Kurths105103862179
Markus Reichstein10338653385
Stephen Polasky9935459148
Sandy P. Harrison9632934004
Owen B. Toon9442432237
Stephen Sitch9426252236
Yong Xu88139139268
Dieter Neher8542426225
Johan Rockström8523657842
Jonathan A. Foley8514470710
Robert J. Scholes8425337019
Christoph Müller8245727274
Robert J. Nicholls7951535729
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
7.2K papers, 449.5K citations

88% related

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
6.2K papers, 426.7K citations

87% related

University of Alaska Fairbanks
17K papers, 750.5K citations

86% related

Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory
8K papers, 504.5K citations

85% related

National Center for Atmospheric Research
19.7K papers, 1.4M citations

85% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023101
2022107
2021479
2020486
2019332
2018355