Institution
University of Hartford
Education•West Hartford, Connecticut, United States•
About: University of Hartford is a education organization based out in West Hartford, Connecticut, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 1244 authors who have published 2481 publications receiving 48973 citations. The organization is also known as: UHart.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Of 371 sexual assault survivors evaluated, more than 40% reported that they were experiencing sexual problems as a result of their assaults, and the need to screen for and provide treatment when necessary for such sexual problems is apparent.
Abstract: Attempts to downplay the sexual component of sexual assault may actually result in an injustice to sexual assault survivors as it may desensitize professionals working with sexual assault survivors to the possible development of sexual problems. Of 371 sexual assault survivors evaluated, more than 40% reported that they were experiencing sexual problems as a result of their assaults. In addition, these assault-related sexual problems can be chronic, enduring for many years. The need to screen for and provide treatment when necessary for such sexual problems is apparent.
82 citations
••
TL;DR: Findings revealed that, on average, females in ST conditions performed less well on mathematics tests than their control counterparts, and the trend in ST effects differed by broader contextual factors like geography and level of education.
Abstract: The current meta-analysis synthesized 17 years of research on stereotype threat (ST). Specifically, it examined the moderating effect of contextual factors on ST. Findings revealed that, on average, females in ST conditions performed less well on mathematics tests than their control counterparts (d =|10.24|). Results also showed that females did not benefit more from female-only testing situations, or testing contexts where they formed the majority. Nevertheless, the trend in ST effects differed by broader contextual factors like geography and level of education, with females in countries with small gender-gaps showing better performance under ST conditions, and ST effects being greater for students in middle and high school compared to college students.
82 citations
••
Simon Fraser University1, University of Fribourg2, National Central University3, Chinese Academy of Sciences4, ETH Zurich5, University of Zagreb6, University of Hartford7, Keio University8, The Chinese University of Hong Kong9, University of Maribor10, University of Queensland11, Florida Atlantic University12, University of Connecticut13, University of São Paulo14, Johannes Kepler University of Linz15, Lahore University of Management Sciences16, RMIT University17, University of New South Wales18, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev19, Monash University20, University of Westminster21, Pennsylvania State University22, Hong Kong Institute of Education23, University of Porto24, University of Los Andes25, University of Calgary26, University of Lethbridge27, University of Texas at Dallas28, University of Valencia29, National Economics University30, Seoul National University31, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart32, University of Canberra33, VU University Amsterdam34, San Francisco State University35, National University of Singapore36, University of Victoria37, Argosy University38
TL;DR: In this article, the utility of both the societal-level and individual-level dimensions of collectivism and individualism values for predicting ethical behaviors of business professionals was investigated. But, the authors found that values at the individual level make a more significant contribution to explaining variance in ethical behaviors than do values at a societal level.
Abstract: Is the societal-level of analysis sufficient today to understand the values of those in the global workforce? Or are individual-level analyses more appropriate for assessing the influence of values on ethical behaviors across country workforces? Using multi-level analyses for a 48-society sample, we test the utility of both the societal-level and individual-level dimensions of collectivism and individualism values for predicting ethical behaviors of business professionals. Our values-based behavioral analysis indicates that values at the individual-level make a more significant contribution to explaining variance in ethical behaviors than do values at the societal-level. Implicitly, our findings question the soundness of using societal-level values measures. Implications for international business research are discussed.
82 citations
••
81 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors test the effectiveness of a college course in media literacy and find that students' responses produced significant differences between the control group and the experimental groups' post-test scores on most (but not all) dependent measures.
Abstract: The general purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of a college course in media literacy Specifically, the course took a holistic approach to media literacy and was designed to heighten college students' awareness of media structures, content, and impact, as well as to encourage students to become more critical/informed participants in the media environment A pre-test, post-test, control group post-test only, quasi-experimental design was employed to assess the effectiveness of this approach to media literacy education Overall, students' responses produced significant differences between the control group and the experimental groups' post-test scores on most (but not all) dependent measures The implications of these results and suggestions for future research were discussed
81 citations
Authors
Showing all 1284 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Michael W. Anderson | 101 | 808 | 63603 |
Cheryl A. Frye | 74 | 291 | 18043 |
Stephen W. Porges | 72 | 257 | 27162 |
Marjorie H. Woollacott | 68 | 157 | 22576 |
Yu Lei | 61 | 293 | 15297 |
William B. Gudykunst | 51 | 102 | 13511 |
Linda S. Pescatello | 49 | 257 | 21971 |
Cynthia S. Pomerleau | 45 | 114 | 6928 |
Benjamin Thompson | 43 | 197 | 5311 |
Eric B. Elbogen | 40 | 163 | 7212 |
Devon S. Johnson | 39 | 63 | 8383 |
Richard F. Kaplan | 38 | 68 | 4357 |
X. Rong Li | 38 | 278 | 12000 |
Lily Elefteriadou | 35 | 179 | 4342 |
Jinwon Park | 35 | 219 | 4092 |