scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Warwick

EducationCoventry, Warwickshire, United Kingdom
About: University of Warwick is a education organization based out in Coventry, Warwickshire, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 26212 authors who have published 77127 publications receiving 2666552 citations. The organization is also known as: Warwick University & The University of Warwick.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: If biocatalytic routes for lignin breakdown could be developed, then lign in represents a potentially rich source of renewable aromatic chemicals.

708 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The current understanding of the mechanisms by which plants control senescence and the processes that are involved is presented.
Abstract: Senescence in green plants is a complex and highly regulated process that occurs as part of plant development or can be prematurely induced by stress. In the last decade, the main focus of research has been on the identification of senescence mutants, as well as on genes that show enhanced expression during senescence. Analysis of these is beginning to expand our understanding of the processes by which senescence functions. Recent rapid advances in genomics resources, especially for the model plant species Arabidopsis, are providing scientists with a dazzling array of tools for the identification and functional analysis of the genes and pathways involved in senescence. In this review, we present the current understanding of the mechanisms by which plants control senescence and the processes that are involved.

704 citations

Book
01 Jan 1983
TL;DR: This book discusses Kantian A Priori Science and the Systems Idea and the Critically-Heuristic Turn, and the case of the 1976 Areawide Health Systems Plan for Central Puget Sound, which pointed towards a "Purposeful Systems" Paradigm of Planning.
Abstract: CONTEMPORARY MODELS OF RATIONAL DISCOURSE. Karl R. Popper's Critical Rationalism: Blind Criticism? Jurgen Habermas' Critical Theory: Toward a Transformed Transcendental Approach. FROM KANTIAN A PRIORI SCIENCE TO CRITICAL HEURISTICS. Introduction to Kantian A Priori Science. Kantian A Priori Science and the Systems Idea: The Critically-Heuristic Turn. Kantian A Priori Science and the Process of Unfolding: The Dialectical Turn. APPLICATION. Toward a "Purposeful Systems" Paradigm of Planning. Project Cybersyn: The Chilean Experience with Cybernetics, 1971-73. Health Systems Planning: The Case of the 1976 Areawide Health Systems Plan for Central Puget Sound. Epilogue. Bibliography. Indexes.

701 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement is an attempt to consolidate and update previous health economic evaluation guidelines efforts into one current, useful reporting guidance.
Abstract: Economic evaluations of health interventions pose a particular challenge for reporting. There is also a need to consolidate and update existing guidelines and promote their use in a user friendly manner. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement is an attempt to consolidate and update previous health economic evaluation guidelines efforts into one current, useful reporting guidance. The primary audiences for the CHEERS statement are researchers reporting economic evaluations and the editors and peer reviewers assessing them for publication. The need for new reporting guidance was identified by a survey of medical editors. A list of possible items based on a systematic review was created. A two round, modified Delphi panel consisting of representatives from academia, clinical practice, industry, government, and the editorial community was conducted. Out of 44 candidate items, 24 items and accompanying recommendations were developed. The recommendations are contained in a user friendly, 24 item checklist. A copy of the statement, accompanying checklist, and this report can be found on the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluations Publication Guidelines Task Force website ( www.ispor.org/TaskForces/EconomicPubGuidelines.asp ). We hope CHEERS will lead to better reporting, and ultimately, better health decisions. To facilitate dissemination and uptake, the CHEERS statement is being co-published across 10 health economics and medical journals. We encourage other journals and groups, to endorse CHEERS. The author team plans to review the checklist for an update in five years.

697 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Stephen J. Smartt1, Ting-Wan Chen2, Anders Jerkstrand2, Michael W. Coughlin3, Erkki Kankare1, Stuart A. Sim1, Morgan Fraser4, Cosimo Inserra5, Kate Maguire1, K. C. Chambers6, M. E. Huber6, Thomas Krühler2, Giorgos Leloudas7, M. R. Magee1, Luke J. Shingles1, K. W. Smith1, David Young1, John L. Tonry6, Rubina Kotak1, Avishay Gal-Yam8, J. D. Lyman9, D. Homan10, C. Agliozzo11, C. Agliozzo12, Joseph P. Anderson13, C. Angus5, Chris Ashall14, Cristina Barbarino15, Franz E. Bauer16, Franz E. Bauer17, Franz E. Bauer12, Marco Berton18, Marco Berton19, M. T. Botticella19, Mattia Bulla15, J. Bulger6, Giacomo Cannizzaro20, Giacomo Cannizzaro21, Zach Cano22, Régis Cartier5, Aleksandar Cikota13, P. Clark1, A. De Cia13, M. Della Valle19, Larry Denneau6, M. Dennefeld23, Luc Dessart24, Georgios Dimitriadis5, Nancy Elias-Rosa, R. E. Firth5, H. Flewelling6, A. Flörs2, A. Franckowiak, C. Frohmaier25, Lluís Galbany26, Santiago González-Gaitán27, Jochen Greiner2, Mariusz Gromadzki28, A. Nicuesa Guelbenzu, Claudia P. Gutiérrez5, A. Hamanowicz13, A. Hamanowicz28, Lorraine Hanlon4, Jussi Harmanen29, Kasper E. Heintz7, Kasper E. Heintz30, A. Heinze6, M.-S. Hernandez31, Simon Hodgkin32, Isobel Hook33, Luca Izzo22, Phil A. James14, Peter G. Jonker21, Peter G. Jonker20, Wolfgang Kerzendorf13, S. Klose, Z. Kostrzewa-Rutkowska20, Z. Kostrzewa-Rutkowska21, Marek Kowalski34, Markus Kromer35, Markus Kromer36, Hanindyo Kuncarayakti29, Andy Lawrence10, T. Lowe6, Eugene A. Magnier6, Ilan Manulis8, Antonio Martin-Carrillo4, Seppo Mattila29, O. McBrien1, André Müller2, Jakob Nordin34, D. O'Neill1, F. Onori21, F. Onori20, J. Palmerio37, Andrea Pastorello19, Ferdinando Patat13, G. Pignata11, G. Pignata12, Ph. Podsiadlowski38, Maria Letizia Pumo19, Maria Letizia Pumo39, S. J. Prentice14, Arne Rau2, A. Razza24, A. Razza13, A. Rest40, A. Rest41, T. M. Reynolds29, Rupak Roy42, Rupak Roy15, Ashley J. Ruiter43, Ashley J. Ruiter44, Krzysztof A. Rybicki28, Lána Salmon4, Patricia Schady2, A. S. B. Schultz6, T. Schweyer2, Ivo R. Seitenzahl44, Ivo R. Seitenzahl43, M. Smith5, Jesper Sollerman15, B. Stalder, Christopher W. Stubbs45, Mark Sullivan5, Helene Szegedi46, Francesco Taddia15, Stefan Taubenberger2, Giacomo Terreran19, Giacomo Terreran47, B. van Soelen46, J. Vos31, Richard J. Wainscoat6, Nicholas A. Walton32, Christopher Waters6, H. Weiland6, Mark Willman6, P. Wiseman2, Darryl Wright48, Łukasz Wyrzykowski28, O. Yaron8 
02 Nov 2017-Nature
TL;DR: Observations and physical modelling of a rapidly fading electromagnetic transient in the galaxy NGC 4993, which is spatially coincident with GW170817, indicate that neutron-star mergers produce gravitational waves and radioactively powered kilonovae, and are a nucleosynthetic source of the r-process elements.
Abstract: Gravitational waves were discovered with the detection of binary black-hole mergers and they should also be detectable from lower-mass neutron-star mergers. These are predicted to eject material rich in heavy radioactive isotopes that can power an electromagnetic signal. This signal is luminous at optical and infrared wavelengths and is called a kilonova. The gravitational-wave source GW170817 arose from a binary neutron-star merger in the nearby Universe with a relatively well confined sky position and distance estimate. Here we report observations and physical modelling of a rapidly fading electromagnetic transient in the galaxy NGC 4993, which is spatially coincident with GW170817 and with a weak, short γ-ray burst. The transient has physical parameters that broadly match the theoretical predictions of blue kilonovae from neutron-star mergers. The emitted electromagnetic radiation can be explained with an ejected mass of 0.04 ± 0.01 solar masses, with an opacity of less than 0.5 square centimetres per gram, at a velocity of 0.2 ± 0.1 times light speed. The power source is constrained to have a power-law slope of -1.2 ± 0.3, consistent with radioactive powering from r-process nuclides. (The r-process is a series of neutron capture reactions that synthesise many of the elements heavier than iron.) We identify line features in the spectra that are consistent with light r-process elements (atomic masses of 90-140). As it fades, the transient rapidly becomes red, and a higher-opacity, lanthanide-rich ejecta component may contribute to the emission. This indicates that neutron-star mergers produce gravitational waves and radioactively powered kilonovae, and are a nucleosynthetic source of the r-process elements.

695 citations


Authors

Showing all 26659 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
David Miller2032573204840
Daniel R. Weinberger177879128450
Kay-Tee Khaw1741389138782
Joseph E. Stiglitz1641142152469
Edmund T. Rolls15361277928
Thomas J. Smith1401775113919
Tim Jones135131491422
Ian Ford13467885769
Paul Harrison133140080539
Sinead Farrington133142291099
Peter Hall132164085019
Paul Brennan132122172748
G. T. Jones13186475491
Peter Simmonds13182362953
Tim Martin12987882390
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Manchester
168K papers, 6.4M citations

95% related

University of Oxford
258.1K papers, 12.9M citations

95% related

University of Bristol
113.1K papers, 4.9M citations

94% related

University of Cambridge
282.2K papers, 14.4M citations

94% related

University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023195
2022734
20214,817
20204,927
20194,602
20184,132